Im posting this picture for comments about its content; I suggest reading my assessment of the pictures content and consider what you feel about it and what this sign says. I will say right now that the sign is propaganda written to sound wise. As humans, like all other mammalian species, we are hard wired to be distrustful of that which is not identifiable to our experience. This is a family, pack or Tribal survival trait and in the basics of nature, it is a necessary discrimination that when breached, yields mortal results; the exception being the ‘nurture’ response often seen to cross even the species barrier in the case of children and infants. I often point to that as evidence of a higher power; however the ‘secularist’ sociologists adamantly disagree. As such the debate of divisions by class, race, religion, etcetera, that they so delight in compelling, inciting, and defining, are decimated by their own disagreement, of there being a higher power or they being the ‘higher power’. What inspires a gorilla to cradle a toddler to fell into its pen; versus ripping it asunder and playing with it like a rag doll? It is interesting to note that we all find the young of almost any species adorable; unless you’re a complete sociopath or their possums. LOL! Psychologically speaking there is of course a cut off limit for such behavior that seems inherently mammalian; if that same toddler, had fallen into a shark pool or reptile enclosure, they would have simply been lunch. So both the capacity for ‘discernment’ and ‘nurturing’ seem to obviously be confined to particular species although the nurturing may be evident in lower reptilian species; by example an alligator guarding their egg clutch. There is no discernment or full term nurturing present however. Once the eggs hatch the vicious, little, snappers are on their own. An inverse example would be that of the Coucou bird (not Sonny, the real bird), which practice a habit known a ‘Brood Parasite’. It lays its eggs in other bird’s nests and the chick, hatching earlier and being larger than the host bird’s chicks, will instinctively usurp the nest, eating or ejecting all of the host birds young. Now if you have bothered to read this far; you might ask why such a lengthy statement regarding an article that which is clearly just condemning the separation of people through classification? Well as stated in the beginning; it’s a hardwired thing, deny it all you want but your not going to walk up to a grizzly and expect a kindly hug; because it is different than you. Provided you are not a complete imbecile anyhow, see “Grizzly man” for examples of that behavior. The secularist sociologist tends to believe that we are intellectually above such ‘primitive’ discernments. That through shear force of their ‘judgment’ we should drop all pretense of difference; that we are all one big family of humanity. Ironically, they are the one’s typically creating this puzzle of ‘taxonomy’ that they seem inclined; not to denounce but exploit. They deny the ‘nature’ of the subject and claim understanding; their solution to rid the world of morality, possession, wealth and any semblance of race or Socialism, if you will. Hence my qualifier of them as being ‘secularist’ as most invariably are and many are atheist as well. One of the chief flaws with Sociology, Psychology and even Psychiatry is, there is no clearly defined taxonomy or classification of each and every situation, disease, treatment, or individual, there exist only conflicting schools of philosophy on the subjects. Indeed the studies are more philosophical than scientific in almost every example of theory that I have read. Some are not without merit but again none having been followed through to the creation of a solid foundation of thought, on the subject; like Chemistry for example. Here we come to the hallmark of the Progressive Philosophy; “Not being pinned down to one value.” As such the three above mentioned ‘sciences’ (mental masturbation is really more apt) are flocked to by both Progressives and Liberals as banners of intellectual superiority beyond that of the theologian. These ideologies are coveted by them due to its metamorphic nature and its pretentious position that humanity is above nature and in fact has ‘dominion over nature’, without it being conveyed upon them by a Creator or the Lord. Here at last the irony apparent; what they condemn the Christian for, the belief in their dominion over all life on earth, they are themselves equally and even more guilty of because they do so without a moral basis or even an ethical insight into the question. Basically to condemn those that separate by religion or anything else for that matter; is to separate out from your own ideology and classify those who do so, as the problem. Concisely: Being part of the problem has never been part of the solution. (To those who wish to contest what I have explained here; know that I wrote every bit of this from memory, no research required and I would delight in a debate about any of the afore mentioned sciences or schools of thought, regarding any and in fact all of them. If your observations are limited to solely your own species, clearly you have a ‘one dimensional’ and thin grasp, of behavioral studies.)
Posted on: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 20:37:04 +0000