In India, is it OK to elect a bad MP to get a good PM? #NaMo fans say it is worth it. NaMo’s vision is compelling enough that the end justifies the means. As a couple of friends say, on the road to development, it is OK to grab lands for urbanization. On the road to economic prosperity, it is OK to indulge in corruption to get the job done. (Usually these things are OK as long as my friends are not at the receiving end of these decisions). These are flawed arguments - a naive point of view. Wrongful means have a habit of coming back to haunt a countrys future. In particular, NaMo has had a key role in selecting candidates and deciding allies. If he really wanted, could he not have simplified your choice and given you good MP candidates? If he has been compelled to nominate bad MP candidates, will he not be compelled to make them Cabinet ministers when elected? Does his strategy include the damage these people will do? If it does not, are you sure you know his complete vision? In summary, will a good PM force you to elect him via a bad MP? Hence is it OK to elect a bad MP to get a good PM?” is a flawed question. Are you really electing a good PM? Think Logically! ~#THELOGICALINDIAN
Posted on: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 08:51:44 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015