In atentia tuturor celor incriminati in cazul Ionut ( version - TopicsExpress



          

In atentia tuturor celor incriminati in cazul Ionut ( version english in down page ) xnici.wordpress/2013/10/29/in-atentia-tuturor-celor-incriminati-in-cazul-ionut/ Fac un apel acum la toti cei care sunt incriminati in cazul Ionut si nu numai. Oameni buni, de urgenta depuneti plangeri penale impotriva bunicii si parintilor pentru neglijenta grava. Parintii nu ar fi trebuit sa lase doi copii mici cu o bunica batrana si bolnava, iar bunica trebuia sa-i supravegheze cu atentie daca tot i-au fost lasati in grija si nu a fost in stare sa spuna ca nu mai poate sa aiba grija de ei. Cinci lucruri stim sigur in acest caz: 1. Cainii NU sunt maidanezi! Doar pentru ca sunt metisi si nu au pedigree, nu inseamna ca acei caini pot fi considerati maidanezi. 2. Terenul pe care a fost gasit Ionut este PROPRIETATE PRIVATA, iar acei caini, adoptati pe hartie sau nu erau “angajati” sa apere proprietatea. 3. Absolut nimeni nu poate fi invinuit ca o persoana intra pe o proprietate privata, fara acceptul proprietarului si are un accident, indiferent de natura sa. 4. Neglijenta grava este o infractiune, iar acel copil putea sa aiba un accident de alta natura. In Romania exista deja un precedent legat de lipsa de supraveghere a unei educatoare, din vina careia un copil patrunde pe o proprietate privata si este muscat de caine. Acea educatoare a fost acuzata de neglijenta intr-o situatie similara (gandul.info/stiri/educatoare-trimisa-in-judecata-in-cazul-unui-copil-muscat-de-caini-11453614) 5. Orice musamalizare a vinei bunicii sau parintilor si incercarea acuzarii unor persoane care nu au absolut nicio vina in acest caz, ridica un semn de intrebare asupra credibilitatii anchetei procurorului desemnat sa se ocupe de cazul Ionut. In acest caz, daca procuratura incrimineaza presupusi detinatori de caini, aceasta inseamna ca acei caini NU ERAU MAIDANEZI, insemnand ca vinovati sunt bunica si parintii care au neglijat copilul, lasandu-l sa intre pe un TEREN PRIVAT pazit de acei caini, iar cazul va fi demontat usor de catre orice persoana acuzata, iar parintii si bunica vor trebui pusi obligatoriu sub acuzatie si parintii decazuti din drepturile parintesti. Daca procuratura va sustine ca acei caini sunt maidanezi fara stapan, atunci primaria, in speta ASPA va fi acuzata ca a lasat acei caini liberi (desi ei tot pe teren privat sunt, deci si aici ei se pot apara simplu) si parintii si bunica tot vor fi acuzati de neglijenta grava pentru ca timp de mai bine de o ora au fost scapati din vedere acesti copii si orice accident se putea intampla. Oricum o dai, intr-o justitie corecta PARINTII SI BUNICA SUNT PRIMII VINOVATI DE MOARTEA LUI IONUT! In acest moment oricine se poate constitui parte civila pentru a depune plangere penala si apoi poate da in judecata familia pentru multe capete de acuzare, inclusiv minciuni legate de faptul ca maidanezi ar fi atacat copilul (desi parintii sustin ca se cauta detinatorii cainilor pentru a fi acuzati, ceea ce reprezinta o contradictie; ori sunt maidanezi, ori sunt caini cu stapan!), instigare publica, obstructionarea justitiei. Aceasta familie trebuie sa plateasca conform legii pentru dublul masacru initiat in Romania, cel al oamenilor, implicit al milioanelor de copii care asista zilnic la torturi inimaginabile si cel al animalelor abandonate de romani iresponsabili si MAI ALES PENTRU MOARTEA PROPRIULUI LOR COPIL! Cati copii trebuie sa mai moara pentru ca parintii sa fie responsabilizati fata de copiii lor si sa inteleaga ca un copil de 4 ani nu are voie sa bantuie singur la peste 1 km de persoana care ar fi trebuit sa-l supravegheze? Ne place sau nu, parintii neglijenti TREBUIE SA PLATEASCA inainte ca si Andrei sa le cada victima pentru ca evident nu sunt in stare sa aiba grija de copiii lor. MAIDANÉZ, -Ă, maidanezi, -e, adj., s. m. și f. (Fam.) (Animal) fără stăpân, vagabond. – Maidan + suf. -ez. Sursa: DEX ’09 (2009) | Art. 89 (2) din Legea 272/2004 privind protectia copilului spune urmatoarele: (2) Prin neglijarea copilului se intelege omisiunea, voluntara sau involuntara, a unei persoane care are responsabilitatea cresterii, ingrijirii sau educarii copilului de a lua orice masura subordonata acestei responsabilitati, fapt care pune in pericol viata, dezvoltarea fizica, mentala, spirituala, morala sau sociala, integritatea corporala, sanatatea fizica sau psihica a copilului. Attention all those incriminated if Ionut xnici.wordpress/2013/10/29/in-atentia-tuturor-celor-incriminati-in-cazul-ionut/ I appeal now to all those who are criminalized for Ionut and others. Folks, emergency criminal complain against grandparents and parents for gross negligence. Parents should not have to leave two young children with a sick old grandmother and grandmother had to watch them carefully if all they were left at home and was not able to say that he can not take care them. Five things we know in this case : January . Dogs are not strays ! Just because you are half-breeds and have pedigree does not mean that dogs can be considered stray . February . The land was found Ionut is private property and the dogs taken in the paper or were not employees to protect property . Three . Absolutely no one can be blamed for a person entering private property without owners consent and has an accident , regardless of its nature. April . Gross negligence is a crime , and the child may have an accident otherwise. In Romania there is already a precedent related to the lack of supervision of a teacher , a child enters fault on private property and is bitten by the dog . That teacher was accused of negligence in a similar situation May . Any cover up the guilt of parents and grandparents or attempt prosecution of people who have absolutely no guilt in this case raises a question mark on the credibility of the investigation the prosecutor assigned to handle the case Ionut . In this case, if the prosecution alleged criminalizing dog owners , this means that dogs were NOT Maidan , meaning grandmother and parents are guilty of neglecting the child , leaving him to enter private land guarded by the dogs , and the case will be removed easily by any person accused and the parents and grandmother will be put in charge compulsory and parents deprived of parental rights . If the prosecution will argue that those stray dogs are strays , then mayor , namely ASPA will be accused of the dogs left free ( although they are all on private land , so here they may appear simple ) parents and grandmother all will be charged with gross negligence because for more than an hour were overlooked these children and any accident could happen . Either you give in a fair justice PARENTS and grandparents are primarily responsible for the death Ionut ! At the moment anyone can file a civil party to the criminal complaint and then can sue the family for several counts , including lying about the fact that stray dogs had attacked the child (although parents say they are looking for dog owners accused , which is a contradiction , or are strays or are away dogs ! ) public incitement , obstruction of justice . This family has to pay for the double massacre initiated by law in Romania , one of the people, thus assisting the millions of copies daily and the unimaginable torture of animals abandoned by the Romans irresponsible , especially for the death of their own child! How many children have to die because parents are accountable to their children and understand that a 4 year old child is not allowed to roam alone over 1 km from the person who was supposed to oversee it ? Like it or not , negligent parents must pay before and Andrei exposed, because obviously they are unable to care for their children. Maidan has , strays , -e, adj. , Sm and f ( Fam. ) ( Animal ) stray bum. - Maidan + suf - ez . Source: DEX 09 (2009 ) | Article 89 (2) of Law 272/ 2004 on Child Protection says the following : (2) Child neglect means failure , voluntary or involuntary , of a person who has the responsibility of raising , educating child care or taking any action subject to such responsibilities , which endangers the life, physical , mental , spiritual, moral or social , physical integrity , physical or mental health of the child.
Posted on: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:39:48 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015