It has been argued that all the eligibility lawsuits against - TopicsExpress



          

It has been argued that all the eligibility lawsuits against Obama have debunked all the birther claims about Obama’s birth certificate. Well, that is wrong. I have found references to some 50 different cases related to Obama’s eligibility. These cases range from Federal and State civil cases, primary and general election ballot challenges, and criminal cases. Almost all of the civil cases were rejected on the grounds of “lack of jurisdiction” or the “lack of standing”. In other words, either the cases were brought to the wrong court to be heard, or the plaintiffs could not “demonstrate to the court sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support that partys participation in the case”. Basically those cases were thrown out before they were heard. A couple cases were also rejected for being frivolous. The criminal cases mainly had to do with the military and the BC was not considered. Also that lady that got crazy in Congress. Many of the ballot challenges were based on the natural born citizenship status clause. Obama’s father was born in Kenya and was never a citizen of this country, nothing about Obama’s birth certificate. The Georgia ballot challenge was interesting in that Obama was subpoenaed to appear, neither he nor his attorneys appeared. Testimony was given about Obama’s SSN, his alias of Soebarkah, his fraudulent birth certificate, and problems on some other documents. Obama’s attorneys did not show, no defense was given, Obama wins. This seems like a good response to this case by Craig Andresen: Obama was subpoenaed by the court and ignored that subpoena. Obama’s attorney stated clearly in a letter to the Georgia Secretary of State that he would not participate in the hearing. Neither Obama nor his attorney were present at that hearing. Failure to appear? Contempt of court? Nope. It seems the outcome was a foregone conclusion doesn’t it? It seems that Obama and his attorney knew there was no need to appear. That they would win without presenting a shred of evidence or offer a whisper of testimony also a foregone conclusion. That they would not be held accountable even for their failure to appear…foregone conclusion. You try it. If YOU get subpoenaed, YOU try not showing up. YOU try having YOUR attorney not show up. YOU try not offering a shred or whisper in YOUR defense and let’s see what happens to YOU and YOUR case. YOU are NOT above the law. Obama…IS. Please repost and send this viral. youtube/watch?annotation_id=annotation_117712&feature=iv&src_vid=dnkTWg1Lcb0&v=PwDqXFCy0Bo
Posted on: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 03:56:23 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015