It´s kindergarten stuff, that is why we don´t know it. But seriously folks, there are some truth (or more of truth) that our needs of clean drinking water are by truthful realism about natural existence - is it not (as when clean waters are natural for drinking or aren´t - whilst I would say tha natural existence itself where animals are with clean drinking water is truly a natural realism for what is important, and when humans are with a slightly different realm of existence - but by our own bodyíly existence as well: we are not that capable of drinking salty water. Maybe salty water as undrinkable is something we have heard about, as a thing that would make us go slightly crazy. I would anticipate that humans have been by an ecologic sence quite always with incapacities to use more salty waters, whereby the question would probably (anyhow) perhaps be with that in mind. We would be with unclean drinking water by an architecture that spills from industirial plants - and that is where nuclear waste would be a same. There are different parts of problematics concerning that what is found - and that what is not found, but is in a realm ofour existence: we don talk to little chidlrean about how we are uncapable of caring (is that not perhaps one word of the practice - as when we realise with and by a social integrity that tells us that we are incapable to in a comparison to Jesus Christ - the concepts of existence by social rule is so inwards taht we aren even slightly capable of understanding how much it is religion that has casued the difficultioes, practially all the problems tat exist in our times. Clean water and terrorism; somethign is wrong an terrorists act - their argumentations are most faulty and are never a true assistance from problems - you meet a persn who lost her wife or husband in a terrorist attack, that took the otherś life; youwould ask if the person who died is with a possibility to do help, in the afterwards of the attack, whilst there is a discussion perhaps going on, concernign if there is a cause to follow for that person who died. No there isn´t a basic continuoum, a thing to do, after death - and a life or many have perhaps gone lost. What would you do about it? Would you declare that religion is acting by faulty methods - whilst the Two Towers are quite known all over the world? Their lack of existence did perhaps make itś cause by religious fallacy itself - religions did take a punch. The world is with a quite grand problem to be solved, and it would be quite certain that nearly each flag of the world´s Countries do show an ownership to Christ, or to Krishna, or to a prophetic wiew where Jesus is reasoned as a nomral man; but the words Immanuyel as so often not mentioned at all. Reason about the flags: what do they represent - where did their existence make a realism; what is the actual same to that amount of seven sacraments - human as Jesus and limbs of the Church - the Head of the Church works from the Vatican -and Bishops and Priests of cloth are underlings to a mighty grand office structure: grand to it´s geographical sense. Reason a Church that jhas Julius Caesar as an ego centre, it does perhasp make it more easy to visualise what a Churhc represents: a human centre did testament a pattern of norms, as when the Curch has different ares with human rule - all are with a contact to a Church itself. It is other practices that do discuss about how to solve about the problematics- it takes a huamn brain to understand and to find possibilities in how to act: an evengelised environment has by the words of the Bible made a social existence that presents all existence to be - as a synonym to an ownership - it truly could perhaps seem to a blind eye as that our regimes by country are those who are without knowledge in how to act - but you would forget that in God we trust. Allright, we are with flags that impress a human ownership - it has all been made to be human and for human; the idiocyncrocy [Idiosyncrasy From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia An idiosyncrasy is an unusual feature of a person (though there are also other uses, see below). It also means odd habit. The term is often used to express eccentricity or peculiarity.[1][2] A synonym may be quirk.] has that it has beenment to be for human use - and thereby it has been at human use. Furthermore - it is perhaps a truth that human feeligns of magic could have contributed into what movie goers would or could call by parables by jokes as to be with a governmental elderly scientology - where aliens are angels and what wants to take our brain is a paradox concerning to create the world - again. -But by the reforms of the Church - the limbs of the Church is houses that have spread out by a patternthat is quite noticeable - and that pattern of human testament or other religios must be made realised and seen for what it has made - and for what a pattern it is, what it by words did reflect as at a simpler form (slavery) and how sin is a Julius Caesars´s hero Jesus gone a villain, by the acts of Godly spirit, from Rome and the Vatican. Santa Claus became an existence in the 1700th century: the-north-pole/history/ - There are some importances that should be noticed - one is that in case a Godliness does exist and when it´s cultural form was brough to other areas - those places were conquered by a please and thief of nature. An other area of importance is that the pattern is totally unnecessary. It should as well (most important) be made known what the actual pattern of office it is that the religions have: religion - legion - God - Peace - faith - law - sinner - slave - a testament - post mortem order. The created Heavens and Earth are a thing of the reforms that were made after that the Bible was made, and the American continent is one of the new changes that have that creation, whilst the words of faith presented Santa Clause as well, but in the past - the fathers house was something that was difficult to find, said Jesus (according words in Bible). It was difficult, thereby it woudl be impossible for Jesus to be mummified, that si actualy what it reflects. Julius Caesar would not die inside a Pyramid - the words were written with an alter ego in mind. As when (for example) God Ra would be a Pharaoh Ramses short for ruler - beware of the son of man was words that are a direct implication to reason about the legions that were in Julius Caesar´s ownerhsip, and a ever so slight of thoughts that a secret or not so secret affari between Julius Caesar and Cleopatra, as when it could hab given a birth to a child by her to Julius Caesar - it would be that alter ego that we would know as Jesus to come as a thief, a thief by words of faith, whilst Jesus was not Roman and would not be with rights to have possibiliites to rule in the Roman Senate. It is quite racist, because it allowes Julius Caesar to hate hismelf - as when we don´t even know much about his realm of ownership, in the secular world. You could make an assumption that undrinkable water would be a bad wine from a God that failed (Metallica - Follow the God that failed) whilst it is perhaps drained and maybe destilled, but a Santa Claus does work by principles of what is for sale, and somebody pays for the presents. What is it that makes us with problems? Her question was with a request for help - the question itself was that why is it a thing of activism to want clean water - should it perhaps not be a simple fact that water´s would not be dirty, just as well when chemical warfare should not have been a reality in earlier time... You could reason that she cries for help - asks for help or discusses for help. In each case she would be with a request that we would be with better possibilities. Is Santa Claus an answer, in case he brings us low human population amount to the future by restricting birth by economy? Santa Claus brings is new patterns to social welfare - but by human manufacture. We get 50 dollars and 50 Euros. Allright - it is about when we get it. On Halloween, when the Great Pumpkin arrives. Everybody loves Charlie Brown. There is no need to fight about economy when we are with a pattern that decreases us - we are not overfishing when our amounts become less. Zoning becomes a landscape for animals. How great - Jodie Foster said that they should have sent a poet... I am not Christian anymore. Winona will have help
Posted on: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 21:15:59 +0000