It used to be known as Quitbism, and it came from a character that - TopicsExpress



          

It used to be known as Quitbism, and it came from a character that was very active in the wormy-writing literature, mostly ignored by the west;but, really a serious idea poison, established for wide distribution, FROM Egypt, to areas populated by all types of Muslims. His name was Saieed Ouitbist (or some similar spelling), and he operated on the early time period of the Brotherhood when it worked underground against the British, back in around the 1920s. The character was eventually killed by Nassar (of Egypt, dictator) for his own political reasons. The guy wrote stuff UTILIZED by Ben Laudin, and a large proportion of Muslims, how to all apply force together, disregarding their particular doctrine-flavor of Islam. That explains how groups hostile to western civilization ways can coagulate their common purpose. They really BELIEVE they have a spiritually-combined Allah approved mission to carry out, individually even, or in small groups. I think the only way to fight them is from a strong counter-faith platform. One thrust vector should EMPHASIZE they got Islam teaching wrong understood. If just a casual reader could figure it out, they should, too, huh? Or, the other possibility might be FAULTY TRANSLATION of their wormy writing, into stuff westerners could read? What I read, tells me, whats really important how to apply jihad needs to be directed at SELF, not other humans (and especially not about kicking over ant hills, what really made their prophet distinctly angry, according to the lingo I read). The faith troubles, different eras and different faiths, have always been about HOW THEY GET APPLIED, politically. There has been a whole bunch of situations over the last 100 years, that have all vectored into important factors that have poisoned character among humans that exist now. (It takes a lot of reading to really gather insight about THAT). I am sorry to have to wonder whether we have a President that read such stuff, and then actually believes all the negatory stuff commonly shared among all types of strident Muslims (including from among specific variants of Sunni and Shea)? Was his choice of worship location under Wright an important clue, never fully press examined? Worry status is on, here.
Posted on: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 03:32:08 +0000

Trending Topics




© 2015