Let y be relationship strength and x be time, where x≥0. I - TopicsExpress



          

Let y be relationship strength and x be time, where x≥0. I have not seen a proportional relationship like y=x. Sure Ive made acquaintances, but only so many can go much further than y=ln(x+1). Then you have those who quickly become good friends then fizzle out like y=x*e^(-x), but yet still better off than those who get together and break-up in a never-ending cycle of y=x*sin(x) . Sure some friends have become worst enemies like y=e^(x) - x^(x), but some enemies have also become great friends like y=6arctan(x-5). There are those who consistently dislike your guts for no apparent reason like y=-5, those who just as consistently like your style like y=5, and those who have no clue who you are, such that y is undefined. Indifferent people stay at y=0, and sometimes the situation gets so complex that you need polar coordinates instead. But with the right arguments, know that you can always find your way back to unity. Relationships can fluctuate between good and bad like y=Ax^2+Bx+C, but remember that even at your minimum point of dy/dx=0, d^(2)y/dx^(2)>0, you may not realise that you could still in the positive if B^2-4AC0. With all these different relationships, it can be hard to see which relationship will function, but I personally prefer to aim for y=x/2+sin(x) for stable, long-term development. Then again once in a while the space-time continuum breaks loose and you get y=tan(x)... What is your function? -Come at me, Math HL Lickitung: (And one wonders why youre still single jkjk) My function? SL Math only. P(Lickitung is attached) = 0 Alternatively, y = potato.
Posted on: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 15:14:35 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015