Linda Burney cannot continue to deny that she did not know of Zeus Case...... Ausaec at AlecommTome 28 Oct 2010 I know, another rejection letter ,, but we’re still trying david, so no I will never shut ut and deal with it. J From: Kim Kenny [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, 27 October 2010 4:07 PM To: ausaec@gmail Subject: Your complaint Importance: High Dear Mr Grayson Please find attached a letter in response to your email below. Yours sincerely Kim Kenny Acting Team Leader | NSW Ombudsman P 9286 0902 | F 9283 2911 | E [email protected] W ombo.nsw.gov.au ● Please consider the environment before printing this correspondence. From: Ausaec at Alecomm [mailto:ausaec@gmail] Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 20:09 To: [email protected] Subject: FW: Australian Legislative Ethics Commission: DoCS Corruption - Alecomm File Reference : 4c1a00a8b48d67.42622462 Importance: High Alecomm File Reference : 4c1a00a8b48d67.42622462 From: Complaints Division at Alecomm [mailto:complaints.alecomm@gmail] Sent: Monday, 27 September 2010 10:38 AM Subject: Fwd: Australian Legislative Ethics Commission: DoCS Corruption – Zeus David Grayson Dear Minister, The father has requested that you please answer these questions. In the case that you fob Alecomm and their victim clients off as per normal, we have taken the liberty to send these questions to some other parties who may be interested in dealing with the matter now rather than 30 years down the track, as it seems you would prefer to deal with all the other cases, such as Emily Brown. You are aware Ms Burney that the stolen generations never stopped, your department just brought in better legislation to prevent the victims from being heard. How disgraceful. To the other government departments emailed, please note that you cannot state that this father has not requested his case be looked into and, hereafter this email, should you not investigate, you cannot claim you have attempted to rectify the criminal acts that have been committed, or tried to establish any justice in this case. To the public authorities contacted, feel free to use this information as you desire, as you can see the government has no interest whatsoever in dealing with any government corruption that exists, nor addressing these government sanctioned violations of our human rights. These file are kept on record and will be used as evidence, when the government pulls its finger out of its hot red ass and addresses the issues, no doubt another 40 years down the track when the maximum amount of damage has been done to all these innocent families. They will claim, as normal to have lost so many files, and try yet again to pay off these victims at $7000 each as they have the last stolen generation. However this time they will not be able to claim they were not aware many years earlier, as we have all records and all emails addressed to each and every person who choses to deny what is happening at the hands of our government still, and $7000 will not cut it. And each and every person committing these heinious crimes will be held accountable for their crimes against humanity. You included Ms Burney, as you are the head honcho of this organization at this time when we are addressing the issues that you are trying to sweep under your sweet parliamentary rug that pays you almost half a million dollars a year. So, Minister Burney, questions from the father are as follows: 1. Why was the Care application in my son Zeuss case signed by the manager at the Narrabri Office when it should have been siogned by the Distrit Manager/Assistant District Masnager of Departmental District Centres (ie Armidale)? 2. Why was the name Zeus Graham on the application when Zeuss name is Grayson? 3. Why was the name only altered on the Court File Document but not on any of the Service Copies? Who Altered it and When? 4. Why was the Psychological Assessment done without the leave of the Court and then allowed to be tendered and considered? 5. How can there be a child in need of Care when the Criminal Charge of No Adequate Provision is dismissed proving beyond reasonable doubt Adequate Provision is being or is likely to be met for the Childs Care? 6. How can a Trainee District Officer sign Care Applications when he has only been in this Country for 10 months? 7. Why wasnt an Aboriginal District Officer and Case Worker handling this case? 8. How come the Magistrate that cannot remember from one day to the next ..or even one hour to the next be allowed determine the long term care of a child? 9. Why was the child removed when DoCS acknowledge that they never believed the Allegation of Bashed and Starved (physical abuse)? 10. Why has no criminal charge of Abduction been taken against Matthew Hatch, (one of the ones that made the original false allegation) when he took Zeus from my yard? 11. Why was it that the Doctors certificate never applied for or submitted by DoCS yet stated there was NO EVIDENCE OF PHYSICAL OR EMOTIONAL ABUSE of Zeus the day after removal? 12. Why was it that all the DoCS interviews were done outside the presence of the parents and with the very people that formulated the Allegation that DoCS never believed? 13. Why was it that the Psychological Assessment done 6 weeks after removal yetthere was a 42 day clean up on these cases at the time(suggesting that they were traumatising the child so as to prove an allegation of Emotional abuse)? 14. Why was it that Probation and Parole Services were alluded to but the reports not submitted? 15. Why were the Police reports not obtained and submitted as there were claims the Police were answering the house at Baranbar Street every fortnight or month? 16. Why was I not interviewed in relation to this as I could have told them Zeus and I were living at Flat 2/9-11 Saunders Street for ten months of the 2 year period in question? With Sincerity Dave Grayson 07 5462 3963
Posted on: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 16:20:49 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015