Logic vs Relativism Equations and mathematics do not substitute for logical reasoning. Consider: • When quantum particles of energy with absolute behavior self-assemble to produce an assembly that exhibits physical presence but the particles retain their behavior, there has been no conversion. Calling the assembly mass or matter does not change the fact that it is an assembly of the original energy particles that remain unchanged. • When such an assembly is disassembled releasing the original unchanged energy particles, as occurs in combustion or fission for example, there has been no conversion. The behavior, including energy intensity, of the original energy particles remain unchanged. The equation E=mc2 is purported to prove conversion of mass to energy however, it merely shows the theorized relationship between the units of measure assigned to the assembled state (Mass) and the assembled energy particles. Even if that relationship is true it does not prove conversion took place. That equation is further compromised by inclusion of the energy expended to produce acceleration of an object as a part of the energy of the involved assembled particles. There is no disputing that an object in motion carries the potential to do work through force but force is not energy and certainly not energy involved in the assembly of the object. It is not energy that would be released by “decay”, disassociation, of the object. In fact, the work done by matter in motion results in the disassociation (disassemble) upon collision, which can be as relatively insignificant as molecules of gasses in the atmosphere, where upon; it is the energy involved in the assembly of the involved objects that is released, not the energy that caused the motion. There are those who will argue that the scenario outlined is not proven but the argument is presented to show that the conservation concept is not proven to be valid. It is the conservation concept that needs proving. Further, the conservation concept makes no allowance for variation in energy behavior. That is tantamount to recognizing the behavior of the energy involved is unchanged, which supports the argument.
Posted on: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 12:17:10 +0000