Margaret Koch on the difference between George Soros and the Koch Brothers: Soros hears a candidates stance that he likes, usually liberal, and supports that party and candidate. But Soros, past approving of and supporting a liberal agenda, has no direct motivation financially -- hes using the traditional method of supporting those one deems to be good. He does not seek to make laws which would profit him specifically through bribery and buying votes.. His interests are long-term toward better government by the people and often include the welfare of the people, too. The Kochs and Murdoch try to set the agenda of a candidate, making offers to support but those offers are allied to threats to ruin him/her and not only withdraw support if he/she strays from their directives, but to see to it that the rebellious candidate is shut out of support of all kinds that can be influenced and thus loses. There is also a direct trail to the Kochs and Murdochs financial interests, and they seek to influence laws to profit themselves specifically, even when those laws put the nation at risk. They seek to actively control our government, but do not want to do it by being elected. Its a corrupt system they are running. Their media investments distort news purposefully and lie on command.
Posted on: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 04:42:27 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015