Marx was not a " Marxist" but communist. Marx was not universal - TopicsExpress



          

Marx was not a " Marxist" but communist. Marx was not universal reformer, rather he was a scientist and he has discovered the science of socialism. So, Marx was never a teacher . No doubt, science and ideology is not same. Communist have no interest separate and apart from those of the proletariat as a whole. But Leninism is not the same. Workers have no country but they have a world to win by losing their chain. But Leninism for national democratic revolution to serve the so-called national interest by grabbing the state power to serve the country. Outcome of the contradiction of the sellers & buyers is communism and culmination of contradiction of sellers & buyers of labour power of the world is the communist revolution, therefore, communist revolution is neither local nor national but universal. Thus, its only job of wage slave alone and no doubt not any other except wage slaves is revolutionary class in this case. Therefore, unity of workers of the world is the first condition and united action of the G-8 at least is one of the first conditions for the emancipation of the wage slaves. Thus, to unite the wage slaves of the world for a communist revolution is not national but global party. Peasants are reactionary. But Leninism for the interest of the peasants also. Certainly right, the Bolshevik Party was not a working class party for a communist revolution. Moreover, under the leadership Lenin the Bolshevik party has founded a state of state capitalism, where the rate of exploitation was much more high than the USA. Therefore, Leninism is the corruption of science of communism. Thus, its the shelter of the decayed capitalism.
Posted on: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 10:28:36 +0000

Trending Topics




© 2015