Matthew J Falkner Patterns of Government Corruption/Racketeering/Fraud Against the United States/Deprivation of Family Rights/Criminal Enterprise Under the Color of Family Law, and Color of Parens Patriae: Financial incentives favor state custody/agency adoptions outside of the legal paternal family if the color of law criminal enterprise (enterprise) deems the chances of it happening in the particular case as being good enough to give the case priority over other current cases in terms of effective and profitable use of time/liability. In other words, the softest targets are targeted with priority, and the pool of targets is always kept full to the level of efficient, effective, profitable capacity. If state custody/agency adoption is the goal of the enterprise, there will be attempts to avoid, coerce, and/or heavily scrutinize/invent dirt on anyone standing in the way in order to get them out of the way. There will be a dragging of feet, and perhaps a fraudulent appearance of performance on any mandatory duty that stands in the way. However, the most legal pathways to the same goal are of course favored. Its usually safest to not traffic every child in the family, as leaving at least one behind means the parent(s) still have something to lose. If the adoption priority isnt immediately present, there is a cost/benefit analysis on the future likelihood of adoption. The foundations of that may be laid, but often that priority is lost due to there being little-to-no dirt on one or more strong minded, fit parents. If this is the case, financial incentives favor maintained conflict, prolonged litigation, and if applicable under any stretch of justification, cps related paid services. There will tend to be a presumption/flimsy findings that both parents are equally at fault for general conflict, or particular wrongdoings. If there is dirt on one parent but not the other, theres a tendency to minimize the dirt, and more heavily fish for dirt/scrutinize the parent that has little to no dirt on them. The fire of protective parent/family members is ignited, and fanned until the fuel (money and willingness/ability to spend it) runs out. Any allegation of abuse against the other parent by a strong willed/impeccably fit parent is almost invariably handled civilly rather than criminally despite any efforts of the impeccable parent. In such a case, privacy/other statutes are used as a cloak of fraud against a fundamentally fair process, and the finding of true fact on the record. If the final decree is going to award custody to a parent, financial incentives favor sole custody to the parent most likely to pay the most money over the longest period of time without trouble.
Posted on: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 17:13:05 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015