Mr. Pervaiz Musharraf please refer to the news item published by the daily Dawn today, titled Musharraf warns of proxy war with India in Afghanistan Sir, now you are warning about a proxy war with India in Afghanistan, but first kindly inform the reasons, how India got its foothold in Afghanistan, whereas, you had clearly declared your governments policy to the Americans and its NATO allies that Pakistans cooperation in the War on Terror (WOT), was strictly linked to the condition that India will NOT have any role in this WOT in Afghanistan? Who, when and why allowed India such a strong foothold in Afghanistan that today, India is able to destabilise Pakistan, from its terrorists and agents trained in Afghanistan? Also please inform the reasons, why you allowed India to construct a heavily fortified fencing wall all along the LOC in Kashmir and the Sialkot working boundary: - Against the national security interests. - In violation of the international rules, where border fencing or wall is ONLY allowed on international borders. - Against the declared policy of Pakistan that too, without any reciprocal concessions from India. There is no doubt that if any civilian leader had done this free favour to India, he would have been dubbed as a traitor and sent to the gallows. ---------------------------------------- Musharraf warns of proxy war with India in Afghanistan By the daily Dawn dated 18 November, 2014 Published about an hour ago Pervez Musharraf. — AP/File KARACHI: The departure of Nato combat forces from Afghanistan could push India and Pakistan towards a proxy war in the troubled state, former military ruler General Pervez Musharraf warned in an interview with AFP. “The danger for Pakistan is... the Indian influence in Afghanistan,” he told AFP at his house in Karachi. “That is another danger for the whole region and for Pakistan because Indian involvement there has an anti-Pakistan connotation. They (India) want to create an anti-Pakistan Afghanistan. Musharraf was a key US ally in its “war on terror” when he was presdient, but he now lives under tight security in his Karachi home, facing Taliban death threats and criminal cases dating back to his near decade-long rule that ended in 2008. The 71-year-old — who seized power in a bloodless coup in 1999 — praised new Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, who made his first official trip to Pakistan last week in a bid to reset ties with Islamabad. Pakistans support is seen as crucial to Afghan peace as US-led forces pull out by the end of this year after 13 years battling the Taliban. But the former strongman said calming tension between India and Pakistan — running high at the moment after some of the worst cross-border firing in years — is key to peace in Afghanistan. Ethnic allegiances India and Pakistan have long accused each other of using proxy forces to try to gain influence in Afghanistan. While India has tried to gain traction with the Tajik ethnic group, which dominates in northern Afghanistan, Pakistan has been accused of using its leverage with the Pashtuns of the countrys south and east who make up the majority of the Taliban. “If Indians are using some elements of the ethnic entities in Afghanistan, then Pakistan will use its own support for ethnic elements, and our ethnic elements are certainly Pashtuns,” Musharraf said. “So we are initiating a proxy war in Afghanistan. This must be avoided.“ Musharraf blamed India for supporting separatist rebels in Balochistan via training camps in southern Afghanistan — a common accusation in military circles. Former Afghan president Hamid Karzai routinely accused Pakistan of secretly backing the Taliban as a hedge against Indian influence in his country. Pakistan denies the accusation, though it was one of only three countries to officially recognise the Afghan Taliban regime, in power from 1996 until 2001 when the US-led invasion resulted in its overthrow. Musharraf criticised former Afghan president Hamid Karzai for sending officials for training in India and not Pakistan, saying “these small things add up to strategic problems”. Ghani and Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif pledged at the weekend to move on from the sniping and bitterness of the Karzai years, with the Afghan leader saying three days of talks had undone 13 years of differences. But Musharraf warned that regional rivalries could flourish again once Natos 34,000-strong combat contingent leaves by the end of next month. “When there is an absence of all these forces, then yes there would be a vacuum... in that case there can be more serious repercussion,” he said. Musharraf said he stands by his decision to ally Pakistan with Washington in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks. But he said that the US-led coalition that invaded Afghanistan to oust the Taliban had “failed to convert a military victory into a political victory” when it handed power to Tajiks and thereby alienated many Pashtuns. Exile to house arrest Musharrafs home in a well-heeled Karachi neighbourhood is decked with photos of him with world leaders, but his dreams of a triumphant homecoming last year were dashed amid allegations of treason and murder. He came back to Pakistan in March 2013 after four years of self-imposed exile to run in the May general election, vowing to “save” the country from Taliban violence and economic ruin. But he was barred from running in the election, and was then put under house arrest and hit with numerous criminal cases — including treason, the first former army chief to face the charge. Despite the setbacks, he said he has no regrets about returning. He also said recent anti-government street protests led by cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan and populist cleric Tahir-ul-Qadri have touched a nerve. “The people are for change, there is no doubt in my mind, and there should be no doubt in anyones mind that the people of Pakistan, the masses of Pakistan, widely and very strongly want change,” he said. ----------------------- Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad
Posted on: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:23:31 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015