My view is simple: if you strongly believe that any book or writing is crap, write a better one. If you feel very strongly that somes arguments are weak, write a strong argument and have it published. People put themselves on the firing line by being brave enough to produce ideas, knowing very well that those ideas could be strongly rejected. But they do it anyway, because they are brave enough to. And then someone comes with a one line statement of That writing is a load of crap and think they have said something profound when all they have done really is to exhale words. If you believe that you have monopoly over intellectual clarity, then lets not be threatened. There are too many people walking around threatening us with their untested, unseen, unheard of and unknown intellectualism, but it seems as if this extraordinary intellectualism is playing hide-n-seek with us. No! Lets see it, so that we can aspire to be at your level. What is true can only be tested in the fire, so as you rubbish those who have made an effort, you must produce better. If you cant do something, stay out of the way of those doing it. Tsek!
Posted on: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 09:16:40 +0000