NOTE: BEFORE MAKING IGNORANT COMMENTS ABOUT THE POST BELOW, PLEASE TAKE THE TIME AS I DID TO RESEARCH THE SUBJECT AT HAND. DON’T JUST JUMP TO A CONCLUSION BECAUSE YOU ONLY KNOW WHAT YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD. It is evident from the reading comments from my last post that lots of people assume that your ability to travel freely on the common way is a “privilege”. After doing some basic research I was able to ascertain two things (I’m sure I’m missing more) that if you don’t give jurisdiction to the State to regulate your every move through contract law, or administrative law (by obtaining a “drivers” license) and you’re not “operating” a “motor vehicle” (these are specific legal terms) nor involved in commerce you can go about your travels without government regulation… granted you might get hassled by some LEO’s. Dont take my word for it as I’m not a lawyer, take the time and research it yourself! Google the right to travel and study some case law (case law that has never been overturned). There are a number of U.S. court cases that substantiate and point out the difference between what a right of the citizen to travel and a government privilege are. Barney v Board of Railroad Commissioners; State v the City of Spokane, 186 P. 864; Ex Parte Dickey (Dickey v Davis), 85 S.E. 781; Teche Lines v Danforth, 12 So.2d 784. One more thing, Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 states that The Constitution of these United States is the supreme law of the land. Any law that is repugnant to the Constitution of America is null and void. Murdock v. Penn., 319 US 105 No State shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it. Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 373 US 262 If the State converts a liberty into a privilege, the Citizen can engage in the right with impunity. Byars v. U.S., 273 US 28 Unlawful search and seizure, your rights must be interpreted in favor of the Citizen. Norton v. Shelby County, 118 US 425 An unconstitutional act is not law, it confers no rights, it imposes no duties, affords no protection, it creates no office. It is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never passed. Miller v. U.S., 230 F. 2nd. 486, 489 Id. at 489-490 The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime. Zobel v. Williams, 457 U.S. 55 Held the right to travel is constitutionally protected. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation, which would abrogate them.
Posted on: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 23:36:47 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015