No need to read beyond the first sentence. Anybody who seriously imagines that Scotlands modern, progressive civic nationalist movement is driven by bile towards the English really hasnt a clue what is going on in Scotland. Brookers problem is that he is a British nationalist. British nationalism is characterised by notions of British exceptionalism and an unfounded sense of innate superiority buttressed by contempt for anything that is not British which all too frequently goes beyond merely bordering on xenophobia. British nationalists tend to be a mindless bunch. Theirs is a faith position. They have never questioned the divinely ordained British state. They regard it as part of the natural order. It wouldnt ever occur to them to question it. They are not equipped to do so. Because the only nationalism they know is one which creates and hates otherness, British nationalists assume that all other nationalism are the same. They genuinely cannot conceive of a pragmatic nationalism which has little or nothing to do with identity and patriotism. Booker wants Scotlands independence movement to be characterised by contempt and disdain because this is all he understands. It is the only way he can deal with a constitutional challenge to the old order and the old ways. It simply isnt open to the British nationalist fanatic to ask whether there might be some rational reason why so many people reject the structures of power and privilege with which he is comfortably familiar. He exemplifies the British establishment at its hyper-defensive worst. - The Political Ceilidh
Posted on: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 11:35:34 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015