Okay this is insane. Try to follow me here. To the quickest version of it. Einstein throws out his theory of General Relativity & it throws a major split in the scientific community. Some jump on board & others dont. Although it was a delayed process different astronomers took photos at separate times. An american astronomer took pictures in Washington State & then when he measured the stars behind the eclipse he saw that the observation disproved Einsteins theory & that the Sun had not warped the time & space around it & the stars beside the sun were in the same place that they should be. (In Einsteins Theory they would be distorted and appear shifted less then a millimeter in the scale of the pictures taken.) K. So then much later, I mean years, an english astronomer goes to Africa & does the same. While this English guy is still looking over his results, the American comes to England to release to the Royal Astronomers Blah Blah Blah that Einstein is wrong, although the English guy isnt done, all his early results show that Einstein is correct & releases his result at the exact same time. So we have a stale mate. Then in Australia another Eclipse, tons of Astronomers are present for this one & most have it not work out & get 0 results. However the English Guy got great photos. Once again EInstein was proven correct & away we go to the future. But wait.... There is still a question.... So photographs arent theories, they are a caption or a mirror reflection of the actual physical world....Right? So how did the 1st guys photos come out with the stars where they should be normally, unwarped so to speak as they should have been under the world of newtonian gravity? Then on the 2nd guys photos they were warped as Einstein gravity predicted? How does reality work one way in one photo & a completely different way in a another photo? How is this possible? It doesnt make sense to me...... Okay... Is it... A. The 1st guy used some sort of a 1920s photoshop & doctored the photos? B. The 1st guy had faulty equipment & its faultiness made it pick up the stars unwarped & exactly where they were suppose to be? C. The Universe worked differently when he took the 1st photo because everyone still believed Newton & changed its mind with the masses beliefs went towards Einstein as more people came around by the time of the 2nd photo? D. In each mans Universe things physically work by what he believes separate from each other. Like parallel realities but each different realities with slightly different rules. & each works differently as to what the individual observer believes? Hence 2 separate outcomes? Im not saying I know the answer & it could be something simple. History has no mention of doctored photos & if anything it blames his camera equipment. But bad photos are bad photos, if they were bad, how could he make the measurements needed in order to see them in the same place. In these photos he either picked up the stars next to the sun or didnt. He did, I saw the photo. They were right there. Were they smudged? Not that I read something that said yes but a 3/4 of a millimeter smudge. With that much of a smudge you would think they wouldnt even try to go one way or another. Although to us 3/4 of a millimeter isnt big, in scientific terms ,compared to the smallest measurements we can measure, it is huge. Einstein set out to prove that time and space wasnt so concrete & more, it was malleable? But what happened afterward in order to prove him right might have shown that Reality is way more malleable then he ever could have dreamed. & they may have had the proof all the time. Maybe (probably) Im reaching but maybe they just didnt look under that rock.... I feel so Ancient Aliens..... Is it possible that?..... HA!
Posted on: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 03:04:06 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015