On Irma-Brewer, They Forgot to weave the Northern and Central District Courts into their Bonas gig, that - the OSC (Order to show cause why Federal Judges shouldn;t take my Federal License to practice, based on a fourth reuse of the same facts that were dismissed with prejudice by the 9th Circuit - working in concert with the State Bar, of course.) Vaughn R. Walker, Chief Judge Courtroom 15, 18th Floor 450 Golden Gate Ave. San Francisco, Calif. 94102 Re: Courts’ Illegal Capitalized Name Contracts Justices V. Walker, Patel and Clerks, I write in response to your invitation (by letter) to me inquiring if I’d like to brief a response to Mr. Sloan and Ms. Remke’s Bar (and their client David Noonan and the county court) published false statements about me - under false colors of authority. To promote judicial economy, I enclosed a CD with a pointed “power” presentation. It contains some personal background, of which you might have been unaware prior to mailing your ‘04 OSC letter to me. Three introductory points assist: A) My 02-26-04 eight pager and 02-01 six pager DOJ’s Marc Siegel. B) The Scope of the U.C.C, section 1-102 “commercial transactions.” C) U.C.C. 1-103 (b) “contract capacity, principal/agent, mistake,” plus.” On a business note, I’ve perused some of your outstanding opinions, like Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944), which is on all fours here: The … county-States and bar government deliberately misled the court securing its affirmance of the non-conviction. Judge Patel, vacating the conviction, stated, It stands as a caution that … the shield of … security must not be used to protect governmental actors from close scrutiny and accountability. Together, the States’ Bar actors and Federal Reserve agents (white shoe firms) are potent adversaries. They’ve long undermined American protocols by capitalized name deceit, .e.g. Being a top executive at Union Bank, your husband Magan understands the county-state and Reserve “law and price war” problem we face. Thank you for inviting my presentation. Kind regards, I previously briefed former Chief Justice Marshall and Justice Jeffrey T. Miller on some background and controlling procedural posture, which I incorporate by reference. “Without prejudice/reservation of all Article Common law controls - Uniform Commercial Code 1-207.4 The Code is complimentary to the Common Law, which remains in force” because no amendment displaces it. Uniform Commercial Code, section 1-103.6. The last sentence of UCC 1-103.6 reads, “The Code cannot be read to preclude a Common Law/action.” ... On Irma Gonzalez-Brewer, as San Diego Fed-Head Judge, she couldnt send me an OSC letter, like the others did - not when hubby Bob and She were both behind the Bonas double play by San Diego County - yep! youtube/watch?v=NwH9gIP11Gk
Posted on: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 03:01:39 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015