On philosophical slang. The easiest discourse to imitate is a (post)deleuzian imperative one: an endless series of overproduction of multiple becomings of multipliying differences of new possibilities of changes of intensities of encountering multiple others and interconnecting different multiple desires of new non-unitary minoritarian subjects of multiple positive becomings others of the others (all against the Old, the One, the Hegel). You open a chapter, say, on animal, or woman, you honestly read over 100 pages, and its still all one and the same, as if going into a skid. Nothing happens, no animals so far, no women. On this, there is always a desire to say: hic Rhodus, hic salta! - please, change, become different, after all!
Posted on: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 01:09:27 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015