One of the most cliche defenses given by hindus playing victim is that the british and arabs came to their land to plunge away their richess. While it may be true in the case of britian which exported everything back to england, but only a deaf dumb and blind individual would say the same applies to mughals who after conquering spent the riches in that very land itself. From monuments to forts and administration to development everything was done within the region of conquer unlike east indian company (britian). Also the weakness and incapability of hindu kings to go beyound and conquer (which btw was the norm of every man and king) should not be defended in such a pathetic way of portraying the muslims bad merely because they came and invaded. Heck alexander and those before and after him did the same yet history glorifies them and ridicules the kings who couldnt move beyound their home ground the way an indian bride doesnt move out of her in laws. Man up and bring academic arguments, not emotional ones. Yes the muslims invaded to relieve you in both the worlds of punishment . Yet they did not force. if they did we would be having islamistan today instead of bharat (india).
Posted on: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 18:17:47 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015