One simply needs to reflect upon the Pew Research Muslims Views on Suicide Bombing to understand the few/Moderate paradigm was/is a lie or at the very least wishful thinking upon which current inter-cultural Islam-Other public policy security and otherwise is based. pewglobal.org/2014/07/01/concerns-about-islamic-extremism-on-the-rise-in-middle-east/pg-2014-07-01-islamic-extremism-10/ The fact that such a view is accepted at all within a culture is totally unacceptable for it inevitably informs terror against Other consistently across time and space. This is the point such a Muslim view-value-ethic-moral position is enabled by the Islamic/Muslim codex (textual and exemplar (messianic) templates) not by watching reruns of Disneys The Lion King. Social psychologist know with relative certainty the notion of Is Islam and Not Islam is a fraudulent construct or if they do not they should go and do less damage elsewhere. Cultures as individuals inform behavioral variances based upon their codex you simply cannot cut out a part of the behavior and say this good bit is the real behavior that evil bit is the not-real behavior. It is the same as a wife beater or a murderer being excused for their crime because They gave to charity. It is absurd what happens when such citizens (cultures) are not held accountable? Communities (cultures) tend to be guided less than individuals by conscience and a sense of responsibility. How much misery does this fact cause mankind! It is the source of wars and every kind of oppression, which fill the earth with pain, sighs and bitterness. (Albert Einstein, 1934) Individuals as Einstein pointed out are not cultures, and any amount of so called moderate adherents of a codex which contains a genocide construct within do not make any difference to the final outcome. As such a codex does not give these so called moderates, dressed in I Love Other T-Shirts after each Islamic atrocity, reflecting back Others values Islamic/Muslim codex justification nor authorization, the power, to become cultural altruistic enforcers. The Islamic/Muslim culture has to be held accountable for the behavioral variance it informs it is no excuse for having a man eating tiger in your midst on the basis only 5% of its diet is human flesh and therefore you should not object as it would hurt its feelings. Absurd. Europe and the upcoming meeting in Washington must reflect upon the fact the Islamic/Muslim ‘Few’/’Moderate’ paradigm has failed as it was clearly destined to, this is a genocide construct you are dealing with. And change the paradigm to “No Victim is the Price of a Cultures admittance to the Public Square.” Understanding a truth “Cultures justify and authorize terror the individual adherent ‘Few’ as individuals or in groups deliver it.”. It is not an argument of the chicken and the egg, which comes first. In this case it is known culture comes first. Culture is therefore responsible as a whole for terror as a political act which requires the cultures many to support and create the ‘Few’. Otherwise the ‘Few’ would never exist to cause such destruction and massive redirection of scarce resources better spent on education, health, infrastructure…. rather than in protecting ourselves from a violent culture within our own Public Square. defenseone/ideas/2015/01/could-paris-attack-change-europes-approach-radical-islam/102606/
Posted on: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:37:48 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015