PART TWO II. VICARIOUS HYPOTHESIS As I have emphasized, implicitly, in the close of the immediately preceding chapter of this report: that the foundation for study of physical processes, does not and could not, provide any effective basis for honest support in a mere (e.g., “ontologically empty”) mathematics as such. Here, the common failure to distinguish causes from effects properly, serves as the crucial issue to be challenged. That includes a need for the separation of the honest science of living processes, as distinguished from the a-priori pseudo-sciences which are premised on the mere mathematical presumptions which, in turn, remain presently premised essentially upon a mechanistic form of an ideology of non-life: such as, for example, the ideology represented by the categorically fraudulent teachings of, again, such ancient malefactors as Euclid and Aristotle. Thus, we might state, fairly, that: from nothing, such as Euclid, there comes, most remarkably, an even less than nothing; and, consequently, that “nothing” actually lacks any actual content which need be considered as directly efficiently real, as in the end of each day of Earth’s continued existence. To simplify the needed discussion, the cases of Euclid and Aristotle represent the production of what have been outrightly intended frauds. The specific character of such frauds, is that they are premised on what is termed as sense-perception (“sense certainty”). That represents, pretty much, the spectacle of the Devil chasing his own reductionist’s tail. There are numerous meaningful treatments of the practical effects of the fraudulent reductionism of that wicked pair. I have been compelled to emphasize here, that the fact to be restated for the sake of emphasis, is that of the essentially underlying fraud of those reductionist fanatics such as Euclid and Aristotle. Their action had been the introduction of what is sometimes identified as a reductionist’s peculiar, greatest hoax, that of the implicit reliance on an attempt to lend the mere appearance of reality by a pseudo-number which can be identified as “zero,” not necessarily by name, but in the effect which underlies the a-priorist fraud which has been slipped into the common classroom use of arithmetic per se, such as the merely conjectural representation of Euclid and Aristotle. Of necessity, contrary to the reductionists, the universe actually shows itself as perfectly creative, from which all of the universe is as if born to our minds for the sake of our consequent recognition of the necessarily repeatedly, ever-freshly reformed nature of their presently inherent imperfections: their vast incompleteness. As a matter of fact, there is no quantity, or a likeness of quantity, or of quality, between the radical reductionist’s mythical sort-of-fascist “zero,” on the one side, and the simple quantity of such as even the individual unit “1,“ on the other. That is the same point in fact which I had restated, implicitly earlier, and as now, in my June 10, 2013 feature, “Nicholas of Cusa, Kepler & Shakespeare.” This applies directly to the subject of the preface, the present chapter, and the presently following chapters here. The crucial point of the argument, is, as I had pointed out briefly in the prefatory part of this present report as a whole, that human sense-perception exists, and has crucial importance in reaching toward an understanding of the typical human use of sense-perception; but, be warned, as I had done in the feature just referenced, that sense-perception as such is not a direct source-medium of the truth of the matter per se. All among the greatest scientists and poets since antiquity, have wrestled with the inherent bit of irony which that issue involves. Sense-perception is an essential tool (“a compass” which merely aims, for its direction) for the ordinary challenges of daily life’s experience; but, despite that fact, as the greatest scientific minds known to us concur, sense-perception is not a truth in fact, per se; it is a mere shadow which we often find convenient to reference, but, one which, also, usually leads us into the traps represented by the effects of the inherent follies of what is merely sense-perception as such. The celebrated 1854 habilitation dissertation of Bernhard Riemann, most notably the concluding single brief paragraph/sentence of the close, aims directly at that crucial point. The work of Max Planck and Albert Einstein, sets a comparably relevant standard for reference on this account, in contrast to the work of the frauds of incurable degenerates such as Bertrand Russell and his often highly praised, and absolutely overpaid dupes. The universal principle at issue under the heading of that subject-matter, is located in the categorical distinction of the member of the human species, from all lesser species. Among all living creatures, only the human individual is actually known to us, potentially, now, as being actually capable of foreseeing future events such as I, for example, have done successfully on a number of important occasions of my work in forecasting; but, sadly, even most human individuals remain victims of an abortive quality of outlook which is expressed by the lack of ability to actually foresee the future: call this problem “Wall Street’s Dirty Disease.” This, just aforesaid, conditional factor of intellectual incompetence which is also typical of the cockroach-like crawlers of Wall Street,[8 ]is generally expressed as the condition induced for the purpose of an intrinsically fraudulent denial of actual knowledge of the future, a denial which is to be regarded as typical among the intellectually dumbed-down majority represented by the victims contained, intellectually, within the inherently, systemically absurd pretexts of an oligarchical system of “sense-certainty,” a condition which is typical among the currently reigning oligarchy’s submitting subjects, presently. The cruellest fraud to be considered, on this account, is the customary inability of the greater mass of humanity, to enjoy access to a knowable experience of the future, an access which, for example, the most important scientists and poets have employed at crucial moments in their life’s experience. In fact, the all-too typical contemporary European or American thinker (notably), is often actually stupefied, if only to the degree that each has been successfully “dumbed down” by the reigning oligarchical and related academic systems of what is actually a form of mental disease which has been often customarily referenced as “prevailing opinion.” Indeed, from the long history of the reigns of the oligarchical systems in such locations as Europe and the Americas, as also, emphatically, among much of the U.S. population, this has been true, most emphatically, for us here and now, but as also since the effect of the assassinations of U.S. President John F. Kennedy and his brother Robert. On this account of fact, since the time of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, there have been a few noteworthy U.S. Presidents, such as the President Ronald Reagan who supported, notably, the initiative for a Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), and with an added consideration for the possibility of a near-echo of something not-dissimilar during President Bill Clinton’s actual term in office—the whole tribe of familiar Bushes echoes the deeply-rooted, treasonously fascist outlook of the late Adolf Hitler crony Prescott Bush. It is essential to bring the nation out of the Bushes. THE GENIUS SHARED BY CUSA & KEPLER The most useful among all the most significant modern illustrations of the practical considerations required on that account, are to recognized as having continued to be fruits of those discoveries made by both Nicholas of Cusa (i.e., De Docta Ignorantia) and, in particular, later, the rarely recognized true meaning of the vicarious hypothesis of Cusa’s most notable follower in science, Johannes Kepler. The probably worst among the arguably notable errors of the civilized, and also among the sillinesses of the generally contrary argument on record, is the doctrine associated with the “creepy-crawly” character of the absolutely contemptible Isaac Newton, one who is to be described as the most corrupt, and, also, the most outrightly silly of them all (Descartes aside). Newton and his influence is far worse than silly dogma; it has been, probably, the greatest maker of fools among the body of even relatively many certified scientists, up to the present time, as still in relatively large numbers, in modern centuries of the trans-Atlantic region, fore and aft. However, the most truly evil of them all, as measured in relatively global effects for a science of modern times, has been Bertrand Russell. Actually, Russell represents an attitude whose point to be made has been sought as a means to actually qualify in a fashion “according to the lights” of such outright hoaxsters as Euclid and Aristotle; that is to say, that which does not actually express a competent representation against what are merely popular, but intrinsically worthless academic opinions—or even worse! Unfortunately, the arguably worst perpetrator of the destruction of the ostensibly educated mind, has been the great evil for recent society which has been typified by the case of the same, justly infamous and murderous Bertrand Russell.[9] Thence, with due consideration, it should follow, that the design of our universe is not to be premised upon the “hollow” foundation of foolishly conventional “economic dogmas of the present day”; but, rather, solutions which are systemically contrary to utterances of such sheer hoaxsters as Bertrand Russell, or the Aristotle and Euclid whom Russell, for one, had followed, perhaps not “faithfully,” but as faithfully as he could in his intrinsically repulsive nature. Money, for example, has no intrinsic value; only the increase of newly-produced power to create truly human creative wealth, as according to the great and profound principle of U.S. Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton, were ever actually relevant to mankind’s appropriately actual intentions. In brief, the “hard point” of truth to be considered here, exists only in its expression as “an ontologically active” motion: it moves, in one sense, or another, but, actually, only through net physical growth and development which is properly now centered on the human species. Life-in-and-of-itself is such an expression. The issue thus before us here, is the analysis of the meaning of motion, or, in other words, a properly qualified principle of causality. If we proceed from the center-of-reference provided by the work of Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa, life as such, is readily to be included; but, there is motion simply as apparently such, a motion which either appears to actually generate motion, or is generated by real motion. The only competent question in an actual physical science of economy, is, therefore: What creates what net increments? Alexander Hamilton had already supplied the needed answer to that question for society. That now said in, perhaps, a sufficient number of ways, what, then, is to be considered as a kind of distinction of what we have chosen to term “life,” as distinguished from mere motion generally? Let us, therefore, also recognize, that the term “motion” is not a simply self-contained notion; the tentative “explanation” of this, is that, speaking “practically,” the universe is, itself, a complexly organized process of processes; and, the task of the relevant investigator, is to sort out, preferably, processes of net physical growth which, variously, complement, or underlie one another as if reciprocally. That much now said to set a standard question-mark of reference: how does life, as we experience this as a phenomenon on Earth, locate and implicitly classify itself? There are several expressions of proof by suitable approximations, by means of which the subject of human insight can be approached as a matter of successive approximations. That much just spoken, a careful consideration of some facts, as I shall outline the case here at a later point in this report’s conclusion, will assist considerably in gaining approaches to the clarification needed for the gaining of relatively good, and significant insight into that subject-matter as a whole. To restate that same point, as is necessary, runs as follows. WHO REALLY KNOWS THE MEANING OF “HUMAN MIND?” My opening statement in the body of these now following aspects of this report, here and now, had not been a spectacular one in its actually essential content, if, perhaps, somewhat surprising to some readers. It were better regarded as in the form of application of some useful ABCs of science, ABCs which usually suffer the inherent risk of not being “perfectly argued,” but are, for exactly that reason, reasonably acceptable, and also preferable for their quality of truthfulness, in contrast to many from among the many actually erring academics and the like, especially in contrast to the cases of such as those who prefer a mere reputation for the popularity of the opinions which have been impressed upon them, rather than the pursuit of what were often difficult truths, but truths nonetheless. The evidence on that account is momentous in both quality and magnitude; I can only include some essentials here. In the meantime, the mankind now dwelling within this Solar System, faces the contention represented for our use as located in some serious errors, especially popular ones; but, in the proper alternative, there is also mankind’s available potential as a source of elementary great achievements for mankind: this, on the condition that the stench left over from heretofore popular opinions were quenched. THE ACTUAL PRINCIPLE OF THE HUMAN MIND There is one essential quality which distinguishes the potential of the individual human mind from that of all among the known beasts: it is, one and all, the ability to foresee the onset of the future. On the one hand, such an ability is specifically native to the human species (despite all contrary sentimentalities), as distinct from all other known species on this specific account. Apparently, “on the other hand,” the effect of the widespread installation of an asserted separation of the members of a ruling class, as often met in the generality of the human population, has produced a specific kind of pernicious effect on the potential of virtually any, perhaps every member of the otherwise unique human species. The “Zeus versus Prometheus” legend, proffers a fair sketch of the matter: which is the image of the murderously vicious slave-master and murderer Zeus, versus the creative mind of the actual producer, the latter as in contrast to such as the murderous oligarchical, brutish beasts of the presently reigning Anglo-Dutch links of our nation’s Wall Street crew and its like abroad. The essential distinction is that of opposition to the victory of the master-slave model of relationship among persons. It is the issue of the scientists, versus the brutish killers represented by the financial oligarchy, such as the depraved creatures which populate Wall Street. That is a fair description; but it is a description of the means by which the oligarch intervenes into the actuality of the distinction of two mutually opposed hominid social prototypes, the one with the correlated intent to crush humanity, such as Queen Elizabeth’s mass-murderous intentions threaten to bring about a massive genocide. AN ACCOUNT OF MANKIND This is to be considered notable, on the account of the selection of certain narrowly defined, special subjects which I have pursued during the interval of the recent approximately six decades, which I have represented in my continued function as a leading-economist-in-matter-of-fact, as since certain achievements in economic forecasting carried out since the later part of the 1950s, the 1960s, and beyond.10 Much of what I have done, thus, professionally, on this account, fits within the domain of the relatively best among the categories of economic forecasting, categories which are locatable in a domain in which my publicized role in economic forecasting has served in promoting the production of a set of fairly unique achievements, speaking relative to the generality of what are otherwise fairly competent, but still poor results among even relatively leading economists in such regions as U.S.A. and in European ranks. Those among my actually relevant achievements, to which I have already referred here, have depended for their sometimes perhaps rare, but relatively spectacular achievements on that which can be brought into focus according to my own emphasis on the potential rates of promotion of the use of a crucially important distinction of the beast from man. By that I mean, thus, my own ability, rather often, to foresee an element of the future of mankind, an ability which, in principle, is nothing less than a unique sort of universal potential, a potential which is specific to the human mind, a quality lacking in all other known species, but, which is typically expressed, variously, in such examples as my rather frequent, successful forecasting of the future breaking-points, and as by the expression of the long-range trends of failure, or success, from time to time, of the economies of specific nations. In fact, it has been a conclusion which I have drawn from a long experience from my own more than ninety years of life this far, that all human beings, if and when they have developed certain innately distinct qualities of the intellectually appropriately cultivated individual, share in the potential of the ability to foresee crucial turns, up or down, in the destiny of their society. This specific distinction of the potential of the appropriately cultivated human individual, corresponds to another unique qualification of human society, the unique role of the use of fire, which has been an ability traced as ranging from earlier signs of fire-sites of “primitive man,” to what has been shown on the account of today’s thermonuclear fusion and prospective matter-anti-matter insights, of such leaders as Max Planck and Albert Einstein, and, hopefully, in the future beyond their time, now today. ON THE SUBJECTS OF FIRE & FORECAST The human species is to be distinguished absolutely from plant and animal life generally, by a principally two-fold distinction of the member of our living species from all others presently known to us. First, there is the principle of fire, which, insofar as we know presently, has been unique to man since the first fireside ever left from a site used by man. It is the categorical advancement of the qualitative intensity of category of fire, as from chemical power, into fission, thermonuclear fusion, and beyond, which distinguishes the human species uniquely as mankind. Second, there is mankind’s potentially willful capacity to foresee the future. The leading indicator of a suppression, or loss of the individual’s capacity to foresee qualitative unique future developments, identifies one crippled by the loss of the ability to foresee future developments, as distinct from a complete human being. Every great scientist has exhibited that ability. Conversely, every person who lacks a show of the ability to forecast the future, is, in the case of young or older persons, thus denied access to an actual foresight into the future. It is almost certain, that the damaging effects of a dominant role of popular opinions, are a principal source of the lack of intellectual and moral foresight, and hence, the suppression of majorities of populations’ ability to rise above the crucially destructive inability to foresee future developments. That was an important factor in the practice of measures of control over human beings who have been victims of a reign of oligarchical systems such as the effects of the reigns of Prescott Bush and his notable family members in U.S. political life. The effect of that disorder of those who lack creative foresight, includes the consequence of cutting off almost the entirety of actually creative human insight into the future, to the effect of defining such persons as inherently depraved with respect to the implications of the ability to develop a conscience which is actually sensitive to the human needs of society. The depravity which the British empire, for example, relishes in Presidents such as the brutish Andrew Jackson, is a reflection of such a disposition which is deadly in its effects on the population of the United States, and in comparable expressions of relative depravity among the governing circles of Europe, and elsewhere. Our republic has failed to incorporate, efficiently, the creativity inhering in such U.S. leaders as Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Quincy Adams, Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses Grant, William McKinley, Franklin Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower, and John F. Kennedy, who have been inspired and creative Presidents; the Bush tribe in the Presidency, and, now, Barack Obama, have exemplified the very worst known political minds of recent times. The case of the indicated Bush’s “I.Q.”, has a certain significance, but not as a profound one in any sense. The British Empire has concentrated a great amount of its political and related energies on keep the dumb, crooked, or foolish in the office of U.S. President, that as early and often as seems to have been possible. The substitution of money for mind in highest office, has been a lingering sort of a recurring affliction among the ranks of our system of the Presidency. ON THE SUBJECT OF FORESIGHT Here and now, precisely there, lies an expression of the creative principle which is characteristic of that which Shakespeare’s work once defined as the “Chorus principle.” That is to emphasize, that such features of the actual history of mankind as great scientific achievements of discovery, have had an effective reach of their personal influence from within society, the result of which has often spanned even centuries, or, implicitly, even more. It is characteristic of justly durable such gifts of immortality to the mortal, which distinguishes mankind from both beasts, and from the beastly humans of Wall Street and like monstrosities. Any truly great discovery of principle, is distinguished by the fact that it never continues as a fixed object, but, rather, exists as a seminal element of the actual in-progress “motion” of a future of mankind, a future proceeding from relatively lower origins of achievements, to those masterpieces, which, like seeds, have been transformed into a fruit of immortality in the outcome of the present, as also the future. Such persons as those, are the true immortals. Their characteristic feature, is that advance in a society which moves from a relatively modest past, to bring about a relatively awesome future state of reality. We come, thus, like seeds, to be, ultimately, as like the great forests composed of a future humanity, an ever-nobler, loving creation of, and by, humanity. Such are the goals of a true immortality, that of the once-born human soul, as written in that heritage which is presented in I Corinthians 13. The important thing to be said, or written, on that account, is, as written by that great prophet, to know, and to be known, born of such a realization as to become within the great bounds of the realized intention of both the presently living and their inheritance. The transition from merely generating a mysterious contribution to future mankind, and to true happiness of the presently living of it, which is the realization of that feat, is also the proper self-realization of one’s own future existence, a true apprehension of a quality which is tantamount, in effect, to immortality. It were better to give a greater future to humanity, than to rely only upon a past which had already been lived; such is the true principle of a human life expressed as an immortal principle of human generation after generation, and after that generation, as shown by the particularly, notable and relevant case of Alexander Hamilton’s uniquely true and brilliant conception of the process which no one lacking actually noëtic qualities of devotion, could actually ever understand, but would rather rely on the dead-end called “deduction,” than that of realizing the true intent of the Federal Constitution of our United States of America. The question: Which is the most natural consequence of the remarks which I have made, immediately, here, is expressed as the proofs of the success of those experiences of our living, whose realization is implicitly more the work of the immortal quality of noëtic achievement of the once-living personality, than the mere product of what has been presently experienced. However, be careful: fantasies as such are plentiful, ephemeral, and never sufficient. The truth must be experienced in the likeness of the life which is still being lived for the sake of the future; otherwise, the wished-for happiness with a prospect for the future, will not be sufficient to secure the indispensable outcome. Thus, the monster, such as the wretches typical among Wall Street’s predators today, relies upon tormenting its intended victims, of which it, too, is also a victim in the end. Even those tortured into a tortured state of self-induced death, must secure some expression of assurance of the efficient, nobler meaning of the life of each of even the tortured, a realization which requires the reduction of the abilities to check the members of the predator class: “I defy you!” The nation which loses that defiant connection to its own future, may lose everything, even for many entire nations! The prankishness of Wall Street, for example, must be squeezed into its suddenly earlier, permanent retirement. The crucial implication of what I have written immediately here, this far, is that the design for promised true freedom must be true, lest it become, otherwise, a silly mere charade. This required achievement which I have placed before you here, immediately, could only occur within the ranks of the human species. That means that it is supplied to human beings through the actual achievements which are forebearers-in-practice of actually realized invasions of the intended future. I have just said, “could!” It must be done actually in some significant part, lest the intention melt away. NOW, THE PRACTICAL MEASURES NEEDED This possibility of our intended success, depends upon a certain principle, which is a unique achievement for the human being: the ability to foresee, and to make the future as it had never been achieved before. The most notable failure among our particular society presently, is the inability to conceptualize an actual future state of progress. The tragedy, heretofore, on that account, is that widespread prevention of the sense of true human progress, an always necessary condition which is created within an active insight into the future of the currently living members of society. On this account, the creatively inspired education of the children of our society, that for gaining a more advanced scientific and closely related knowledge of the future, occurring in such as the classrooms, is the only assurance that mankind will become truly fit to be called mankind, rather than molt into some profoundly evil thing to the contrary. That must be leading virtually everywhere, in countering, thus, such leading policies of practice of the present role of that inherent evil of the Anglo-Dutch imperialist tyranny which is currently still dominating, and worsening the current state of most of the world, directly, or indirectly, still presently. For the sake of ourselves, we in the United States must become truly the Americans we have often claimed to have been, as in a mirror of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, and for the sake of the outcome provided by the great master of a unique quality of the science of economy, that U.S. Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton, without whose genius, the United States would not have survived even early on. It is from that vantage-point that we may become enabled to realize what it is that we must strive to become. The failures of the United States, as distinct from the most frequent choices for President (especially the legacy of “Bushes” since Hitler-supporter Prescott), have been the disease which has done the most to destroy our republic so far. III. THE GENIUS OF THE HUMAN MIND As I have already included within the closing paragraphs of this chapter now in progress, the human individual differs qualitatively, and, yet, also most profoundly, from all other forms of life presently known to us. The essential distinction resides within the uniqueness of what is best identified as the noëtic principle, which is presumably known, or, at minimum, is practically knowable to members of the human species. That is a principle which is actually accessed by the human species, but, unfortunately, does not often reach efficiently enough into the ranks of most of the populations up to this time. The very idea of human intellectual freedom to decide competently, depends absolutely on insight into the subject of this distinction. There exist essentially three respectively distinct categories of differences to be considered here. The differences have lain, chiefly, under the domination of the often ruling influence exerted by what is known as “the oligarchical principle.” (E.g., the Roman or British empire.) The other two have been, for one case, the depressed victims of such forms of oligarchism as that of the Roman empire prior to its rulers’ descent into a probably fully-deserved Hell, and, for the other case, the truly principal human type, the relatively richer population of what true mankind must become: what mankind is implicitly to be intended to become. Those three exemplary classes of types are by no means arbitrary, nor merely fanciful. The quality of what might be usefully classed as “the good,” is not merely fanciful in any actual respect. The history of mankind as such, has delivered what is to be regarded as the living prospect of “The Necessary Truth.” The crucial fact to be considered, is the indispensable difference of mankind from all of the beasts, as also from the two-legged beasts. THE ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE From the standpoint of biological distinctions among functions, mankind enjoys two leading, interactive qualities of distinctions from all other presently known, living species. For the one instance, the measure is the increase of the energy-flux-density expressed by the human species per-capita: i.e., the principle of what is called “physical science.” For the other, the closely related ability of the adequately developed exercise of the human individual’s ability to actually foresee the future; that, as I have often learned afresh, from experience, is the true acme of human achievement which is to be located in the combination of those two distinguishably, essentially indispensable qualities: science and the making of the future. The notable additional consideration, is the distinction among nominal classes of members of the human species, which once often signified the distinction of master from slave. Somewhere in the process of past history of mankind, the human society had been (so-to-speak) divided between masters and the more populous aggregations of virtual slaves or quasi-slaves, the division of the reigning, from those identifiable as the suppressed. Notably, were there not the agency of suppression of those who are classed as underlings, as by the self-described brutal current world empress known as the Queen of England at this moment—the Queen who demands a rate of mass-death of all but 14% of the current human population—the common human standard for human individual life would be expressed as a concentration of persons associated with emphasis on behaviors dedicated to rising rates of human progress in energy-flux-density of the individual human capabilities per-capita generally. For the contrary course, the mass-murderous fall of Troy bespeaks the prototype of reduction of so-called classes of society, whether either to utter destruction by ugly victors, or virtual, or actual slavery and its associated tendency toward utter degradation, as by itself, which now reigns in and is uttered from the slaughter-house of Windsor. But, put that imperial bestiality to one side. Consider the uniquely astonishing true genius of mankind! Let the effect of the progress of the human mind, once unleashed, speak for itself. There is presently, no visible evidence in support of reasonable doubt, that mankind has the prospectively known means to reach the early goal of transcendence to a general means of thermonuclear fusion. None of the presently apparent limitations on the rate of progress of mankind, commands a visible true certainty of failure in such achievements for the remainder of this present century. Two illustrations are convenient. Consider, first, the fact that the rates of evolutionary progress which had been illustrated in such cases as the Presidency of President John F. Kennedy, need never have been obstructed, except by the brutishly crude methods of frustration by, chiefly, the advocates of President Kennedy’s murder by the opponents of his policy as President. If we take into account what was readily waiting to be accomplished as progress, but for President Kennedy’s assassination, we are implicitly compelled to recognize the fact, that a general launching of a so-called “environmentalist” dogma was being actively promoted as a “green” policy during the same interval as President Kennedy’s assassination, as, coincidentally, by the British monarchy and its Dutch oligarchical associates. Whatever the details in that pattern, the pattern had been introduced, top-down, not by need, but by choice. The pattern of accelerating collapse of the U.S. economy over the continuing pattern of changes since, leaves no reasonable doubt of the truly underlying causes of the horrid sufferings which those same trends have brought the Americas, Europe, and other regions of the world, similarly, since the death of President John F. Kennedy. We have now reached the outer limits of seventy-five years of a drift into a presently looming Hell, made, in effect, by the reigning powers of the trans-Atlantic world since the close of the war that never actually closed, the alleged non-gaps between the nominal close of World War II, and the presently rising prospect of a thermo-nuclear extinction conducted in the indicated motive of the combined interest of the British empire and thermonuclear World War III. There should have been no reason for confusion respecting the causes, intentions, and likely outcome of the actually unbroken link between “World War II” and an impending, thermo-nuclear “World War III.” Only the Human Will appears to stand between the past and present prospects and virtually total destruction. I am, at least potentially, of a different image of the future; the future, in principle, is not what happens, but what must be made to occur. On that account, consider the true prospects of mankind, and the evil forces which threaten a different outcome. In fact, it is foolish, in the extreme, to prejudge the outcome, in light of the great, outstanding power represented by the presently very existence of the human species as it has developed, as we have actually known it during the course of thousands of years to the present date. The choice of outcome has never been “the end” at any time to present date, whereas, today, there would be no hope of survival for anyone, not even the utterly, less than truly depraved fool, who caused the unleashing of thermonuclear War III. No one could be a worse criminal, than he, or she, who failed to prevent it. It, therefore, appears to me, that the immediate bankrupting of Wall Street and similar ventures, is the most probable option for preventing thermonuclear World War III. If Wall Street were as bankrupted as it were already bankrupt in fact, and surely deserves to be, then, the cause for general warfare would no longer exist. It is, in fact, already, long since, a hopeless investment. The fact of the matter is, presently, that there is not sufficient nominal monetary wealth in the entire planet to prevent a fatal extinction of the existing, far worse than hopelessly bankrupt, current international monetarist system itself. What I have just reported, so, is true in fact, already. It is the implications of the presently hopeless financial collapse of the trans-Atlantic powers, which dominate the present trends. Those financier-predators have no successful reason to continue to exist, except to hope to outlive Wall Street’s own self-inflicted extermination. Their own sense of security on this account, is their witless determination not to acknowledge the reality of their own, now imminent, self-extinction. They are following now nothing as much as the futility of their own search for their wholly hopeless, already onrushing non-existence. The solution, the only real solution, is to be found in that solution. For how many hours could they, themselves, expect to continue to exist under the same conditions which they themselves are presently determined to now bring quickly upon themselves? SEEING OUR FUTURE The greatest achievement of any human individual, is to be located in that which is fairly identified as the noëtic principle. The standard for performance of the human individual or his or her species, is located essentially in the so-called “noëtic principle:” recognizing the essential experience of experiencing an actually creative discovery during the latest moment of a truly unique discovery, no later than the moment before “now.” Footnotes 1The silly practice of counting quantities of merely money as a measure of wealth or decline, needs be judged against two most relevant measures of fact. First, the actually physical rate of consumption of net physical resources of what had been the actual physical standard of living per capita, as compared against the lunacy of Wall Street gamblers’ net consumption of sheer waste. When actually physical standards are adopted, everyone on Wall Street is implicitly exposed as a worthless swindler, who belongs, consequently, in a prison for swindlers, not in positions in government. 2Unfortunately, numerous among notable specialists in the subject of space, have shown themselves ignorant of the intrinsic incompetence of the customary, but misguided, popular conceptions of sense-perceptions as such. 3Cf. Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., “Nicholas of Cusa, Kepler & Shakespeare,” June 10, 2013, in [[EIR]], June 21, 2013 [[larouchepub/lar/2013/4025genius_cusa_kepler_shakes.html]], or [[LaRouche PAC]] [[larouchepac/node/26982]]. Most people of this planet are so much attached to their experience, that they tend to imagine, mistakenly, even usually, that their habituated outline for opportunities is, for them, the only existing truth. 4This is not to deny the phenomena of sense-perception, but to “downgrade” such phenomena’s being merely “self-evident” phenomena, rather than “merely sense-phenomena.” I.e., the case of Johannes Kepler’s actual intention in stating a notion ofvicarious hypothesis: e.g., “as if shadows of reality.” 5As contrasted to such modern scientists as Nicholas of Cusa’s De Docta Ignorantia, Johannes Kepler, Gottfried Leibniz, Bernhard Riemann, et al., Max Planck, and Albert Einstein, and as contrary to hoaxsters such as Bertrand Russell and his Twentieth-century school of pseudo-scientific behaviorism. Consider my own proposed action, in that specific light, for installation of Glass-Steagall. That is the only actually available means for preventing a massive genocide launched against a global humanity: unless Glass-Steagall were launched during the immediate future. 6Cf. Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., “Nicholas of Cusa, Kepler & Shakespeare,” June 10, 2013, in [[EIR]], June 21, 2013 [[larouchepub/lar/2013/4025genius_cusa_kepler_shakes.html]], or [[LaRouche PAC]] [[larouchepac/node/26982]]. 7It is a matter of scientific principle, that sense-perception read as literally true, is presently the source of inherent incompetence for the purposes of actual science. See “Nicholas of Cusa, Kepler & Shakespeare.” Adopt Shakespeare’s “Chorus” from King Henry V as a relevant example here. 8I had the pleasure of exposing the utter incompetence all of the notable Wall Street forecasts of that time, during the period following the general collapse of Summer-Winter 1971. See the Queens College events of December 2, 1971. [On that date, leading Keynesian economist Abba Lerner disgraced himself in a debate with LaRouche]. Wall Street has never actually improved in net performance since that time. 9Before I shall have completed this report, I shall state the case for actual human creativity. 10My first forecast “on the record,” had been made formally, initially, as a by-product of my role as a management consultant, in the middle 1950s onward. What I have recognized, for my own part, as my status as ranking economist in the U.S.A. and beyond, had come quickly in my outstanding role in international contention during the very early 1970s and beyond. That was established in the simplest terms of reference in a celebrated, internationally publicized debate, on that account, in December 2, 1971, conducted at New York City’s Queens College.
Posted on: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:30:41 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015