PUBLIC NOTICE: Lawfully issued on this the 25th Day of December in the Year of Our LORD 2014 by edward-malone; johnston, a living man (non-corporation) TO: ALL NEWS MEDIA, et al (Lines 1 - 526) UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT UNITED STATES MILITARY, et al SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES PRESIDENT AND CEO OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, dba, a FEDERAL CORPORATION NON FOR PROFITS: BARACK OBAMA: LAWFUL Public NOTICE AND Constitutional law of the land DEMAND Whereas this Constitution for the United States of America, Lawful children, women and the men, Title 7 USCA CHAPTER 6 § 136 (Page 3) (d) Animal The term animal means all vertebrate and invertebrate species, including but not limited to man and other. Now you are practicing cannibalism this is a question of these union States 50 now totally recognize how the criminal fraud against us are being played out, by our elected, appointed, and hired leaders/employees, religion organization we are left with no other choice but to demand the following adjustment be made to our political system: We have a right to know If you stand with We the People of these United States of America, now 50, 1776 constitutional laws print copy notarized and Pass on to all peace and god bless Jesus.. link filed papers file with the Queen of England and Vatican filled constitution reference numbers included 1993,, 1776 law of the united state of Americans soil only by the Treaty of 1213. specialcollections.uws.ac.uk/documents/1.pdf specialcollections.uws.ac.uk Merely being native born within the territorial boundaries of the United States of America does not make such an inhabitant a Citizen of the United States subject to the jurisdiction of the Fourteenth Amendment ... Elk v. Wilkins, Neb (1884), 5s.ct.41,112 U.S. 99, 28 L. Ed. 643. Effective immediately all acting LEGISLATIVE, EXECUTIVE AND JUDICIAL Branches of our Constitutional Republics government shall remove themselves from the District of Columbia and return to the City of Philadelphia, PA. and shall set up a new Nations Capital in or around this area but at no time shall it ever be within a holding territory belonging to the United States such as the District of Columbia, New York City, New York, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, et al, as no territory has any jurisdiction over a union State lawful inhabitants, now 50 states. The PRESIDENT AND CEOS called, CONGRESS of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, dba, a FEDERAL CORPORATION, shall CEASE AND DESIST passing any further legislation/CORPORATE POLICIES against these union States lawful inhabitants immediately as you are doing it under false and fraudulent pretense – A DEMOCRATIC DEMOCRACY form of government. Whereas the UNITED STATES IS A FEDERAL CORPORATION and not a government the U.P.U. can only have lawful treaties with nations then any mail you receive is one count of mail fraud, et al, especially mailings from the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE a private corporation; The IRS can take no action, Notice of Levy and Lien, against a supposed tax payer until first taking them to court. The case: (1/25/2005) Schulz v. IRS 04-0196-cv 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Cir. Room 1702, U.S. Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York City, NY.; out of the STATE OF DELAWARE. Please add 28 U.S.C. Definitions 15) the United States means A) a Federal Corporation also see B) and C). The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and the name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.16th American Jurisprudence 2d, Section 177, late 2nd, Section 256,,,,,,,,Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property...and is regarded as UNALIENABLE. 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987. Lawful, Due proses is Constitutional the private American side 1866 civil rights act to protect lawful Americans from there Elected and public Employees, Judicial proses of a jury of 12, jury nullification 6 jury of your peers of injured party 6 jury of your peers of the woman or man who injured said party , Not a jury of six hand pick by a jury coordinator for said state corporation that could lean to said corps financial gains Fraud and treasonous fraud upon the court Constitutional lawlessness court proceeding and major Conflict of interest thereof: Many of our people seem to believe that their state government has jurisdiction to stop the common law Grand Juries. However, the state government only has authority over statutory (ie. state) law, not common law. The common law of Englands treaty of 1213 the beginning was used to establish the U.S. Constitution, so it existed before it and, thus, it is superior to it. The common law is time immemorial. The state government did not create the common law, so it has no authority to abolish it or control it, unless we allow ourselves to be tricked to putting common law under statutory law, where its their house, their rules. However, if we operate outside the statutory rules by invoking common law, no state government has the authority or jurisdiction to dictate, control or abolish what we do. They only have authority to enforce our decisions. U.S. Supreme Court acknowledged the authority of the common law Grand Jury (U.S. v. Williams), why would the state have authority to counter that opinion? The common law is superior to all statutory law, and we must only invoke it in the right way to have superior standing. We need to stop putting the common law and the Grand Juries underneath their inferior statutory laws. The people (singular AND plural) have the ultimate authority! Quo Warranto https://youtube/watch… Contacts National Liberty Alliance nationallibertyalliance.org Why are there not 2 swearing in Ceremonies? The first at the State level, Republican Form of Government, and a Second at the Federal Level to support and Defend this Constitution for the United States of America? To whom are you Pledging your allegiance? The Democracy - Shame on you. Whereas you are elected to office within a Republican Form of Government and fail to acknowledge the existence thereof once returning to the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, also a CORPORATION, you have committed TREASON against the Constitution for the United States of America and have and are violating your Oath of Office to preserve and protect this Constitution. By your actions you are nothing short of Home-grown Terrorists – Traitors. It is now time for this adjustment to our political system. Yes we the Lawful Americans Bloodline of 1776 revolutionary war including 1866 civil war, world war II, children, woman, and man can except you are learning the truth of are republican government. Now please correct your eras of your misguided education including in are Constitutional publicly funded education as all children woman and man shall know their constitutional and contract laws by said law of allocation of said education funds. 5 USC § 3331 Oath of office: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution for the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” peace and GOD bless Jesus US Constitution Article. II. Section. 4. The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. 18 USC 1918 1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government; By the great weight of authority it is acknowledged that generally public officials are not immune from suit when they allegedly violate the civil rights of citizens, and that a public officials defense of immunity is to be sparingly applied in these kinds of cases. James v. Ogilvie, 1970, DC Ill., 310 F. Sup. 661, 663.Includes all Agencys and Elected and public employees , read Title 18 241-242 Did you know that the government is acting outside its jurisdiction every time a police officer talks to a citizen without a verified criminal complaint from another man or women of the community, no victim no crime, its called corpus dilicti rule. also, the state and officers are under color of authority, any statute that infringes on a man or women individual rights is null and void on face ab inito thereof. United States of America Congressional Record Monday, August 19, 1940 Excerpt – pages 4-5 You have now been advised of the problem and it is now time for the corrections to be made to solve these political, social and economic delinquency currently running a muck throughout our land. Westin, The Wire-Tapping Problem, 52 Col. L. Rev. 165 (1952).What is perhaps even more noteworthy is its pervasive disregard in practice by those who as law officers owe special obedience to law. What is true of the federal Act against wiretapping and its violations is widely true of related state legislation and its disobedience. Few sociological generalizations are more valid than that lawlessness begets lawlessness. Why are you violating yours , our Treaties? digital.library.okstate.edu/kappler/Vol2/Toc.htm Where are our approvals to these criminal activities by these current fraud schemes under this Democracy? Democratic form of Government – it is within itself Treason Against the Constitution thereof. SO THE NEXT TIME YOUR REPRESENTATIVE SAYS HE CAN DO NOTHING SAY I WILL SEE YOU IN COURT THEN FOR FAILING TO PROTECT ME AND VIOLATING YOUR OATH Power of Congress to enforce civil rights Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States, 379 U.S. 241 (1964) The Civil Rights Act of 1964 applies to places of public accommodation patronized by interstate travelers by reason of the Commerce Clause. Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294 (1964) The power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce extends to a restaurant that is not patronized by interstate travelers but which serves food that has moved in interstate commerce. This ruling makes the Civil Rights Act of 1964 apply to virtually all businesses. South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301 (1966) The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a valid exercise of Congresss power under Section 2 of the Fifteenth Amendment. Katzenbach v. Morgan, 384 U.S. 641 (1966) Congress may enact laws stemming from Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment that increase the rights of citizens beyond what the judiciary has recognized. City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997) Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment does not permit Congress to substantially increase the scope of the rights determined by the judiciary. Congress may only enact remedial or preventative measures that are consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment interpretations of the Supreme Court. Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. ___ (2013) Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which contains the coverage formula that determines which state and local jurisdictions are subjected to federal preclearance from the United States Department of Justice before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices based on their histories of racial discrimination in voting, is unconstitutional because it no longer reflects current societal conditions. Whereas is this committing possible treason Classified Bill!! John Haller - World News wn/CLASSIFIED_BILL!!_(John_Haller) Sunday, 14 December 2014. Classified Bill!! John Haller. Videos; Video Details; News; Wiki; Images; Lyrics; Related; Collage Corfield v. Coryell, 6 Fed. Cas. 546 (C.C.E.D. Pa. 1823) Some of the rights protected by the Privileges and Immunities Clause include the freedom of movement through the states, the right of access to the courts, the right to purchase and hold property, an exemption from higher taxes than those paid by state residents, and the right to vote. Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866) Trying citizens in military courts is unconstitutional when civilian courts are still operating. Trial by military tribunal is constitutional only when there is no power left but the military, and the military may validly try criminals only as long as is absolutely necessary. Crandall v. Nevada, 73 U.S. 35 (1868) The freedom of movement is a fundamental right; a state cannot inhibit people from leaving the state by taxing them. Whereas The US Supreme Court has ruled that a natural individual entitled to relief is “entitled to free access to its judicial tribunals and public offices in every State of the Union(2 Black 620, see also Crandell v Nevada, 6 Wall 35]. Constitutional Right to petition this court in this matter in which he/she is entitled to relief, as it appears that the filing fee rule was originally implemented for fictions and subjects of the State and should not be applied to the Plaintiff who is a natural individual and entitled to relief Petitioner (libellant) cannot be charged a fee as no charge can be placed upon a citizen as a condition precedent to exercise his/her Constitutional Rights, his/her rights secured by the Constitution. A fee is a charge “fixed by law for services fixed by public officers or for use of a privilege under control of government.” Fort Smith Gas Co. v Wisemen” 189 Ark.675 74 SW.2d 789,790, from Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Ed. Examine DDEs Executive Order 10834 and the Martial Law Flag which falls under Military Regulation. The military are the only ones who can lawfully fly this flag as this Executive Order clearly states any gold fringe added to an American Flag mutilates the flag and carries a 1-year prison term and is considered as misuse of the Flag. US citizenship (14th amendment?) Allgeyer v. Louisiana, 165 U.S. 578 (1897) The liberty that is protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment includes economic liberty. United States v. Wheeler, 254 U.S. 281 (1920) The Constitution grants to the states the power to prosecute individuals for wrongful interference with the right to travel. Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957) United States citizens abroad, even when associated with the military, cannot be deprived of the protections of the Constitution and cannot be made subject to military jurisdiction. United States v. Guest, 383 U.S. 745 (1966) There is a constitutional right to travel from state to state, and the protections of the Fourteenth Amendment extend to citizens who suffer rights deprivations at the hands of private conspiracies where there is minimal state participation in the conspiracy. Afroyim v. Rusk, 387 U.S. 253 (1967) The right of citizenship is protected by the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Congress has no power under the Constitution to revoke a persons United States citizenship unless he or she voluntarily relinquishes it. OConnor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563 (1975) The states cannot involuntarily commit individuals if they are not a danger to themselves or others and are capable of living by themselves or with the aid of responsible family members or friends. Our rights as American Nationals: Fraud by trickery through the Democratic form of Government - SO THE NEXT TIME YOUR REPRESENTATIVE SAYS HE CAN DO NOTHING OR IGNORE YOU COMPLETELY SAY I WILL SEE YOU IN COURT THEN FOR FAILING TO PROTECT ME AND VIOLATING YOUR OATH Power of Congress to enforce civil rights Not foreign agents, religions or religious Corporate Policys, only applies to the District of Columbia, NY City, The Territories belonging to the United States of America free children, woman and man. These entities have no jurisdiction within the Republican, republic of the union territorys/States 50, and are treason against the lawful Constitution thereof. We The Lawful men, women and children of the usa demand the foreign Non for profits - Corporations, including elected and public service unions members who have refused to honor thy oath office repay all moneys borrowed using our names [JOHN and JANE DOES] BIRTH CERTIFACTE , DEAD ,ENITY ,good faith , and credit as it is all a fraud scheme.Title18 USC 241 -242-306-1001- I - 207 Judge Rules that Government Debt is Covered by FDCPA, Forcing Collection Agency to Defend the Federal Corporation. insidearm/…/judge-rules-that-government-deb…/ Fraud by trickery is when the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE counterfeits 26 I.R.C. 6331(a) Jurisdiction of the Secretary by elimination of this section of the code: Documents; form 668-A(c)(Rev.1-01)16740V Sect 6331. LEVY AND DISTRAINT. This Section begins with part (a) not (b): (a) Authority of Secretary If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same within 10 days after notice and demand, it shall be lawful for the Secretary to collect such tax (and such further sum as shall be sufficient to cover the expenses of the levy) by levy upon all property and rights to property (except such property as is exempt under section 6334) belonging to such person or on which there is a lien provided in this chapter for the payment of such tax. Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, or elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia, by serving a notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d)) of such officer, employee, or elected official. If the Secretary makes a finding that the collection of such tax is in jeopardy, notice and demand for immediate payment of such tax may be made by the Secretary and, upon failure or refusal to pay such tax, collection thereof by levy shall be lawful without regard to the 10-day period provided in this section. For all non profit gifts to any government agency/employee/Elected Official, et al, you must also file a 1099-A to make sure they report it as income on their Individual/Corporate Tax Return. Fair Debt Collection Practices Act | Federal Trade Commission ftc.gov/.../fair-debt-collection-practices-act-text The Clearfield Doctrine,,,scribd/doc/96926258/The-Clearfield-Doctrine Clearfield Doctrine proves when governments descend to the corporate level they CEASE to be governmental entities. Clearfield Doctrine It is well settled that an officer must be either elected, appointed or commissioned. Employees cannot be made officers “by virtue of their employment.” Even if they could, I.C. 59 -703 (9) states,“Public office means any position in which the normal and usual duties are conducted on behalf of a governmental entity.” Government officials and agencies, including all State legislatures, county, citys are bound by the Constitution and Shall NOT create any de facto 1871 Act, 1933 Bankruptcy Act, laws, Statute, Code and Executive Ordrer(s) which counter the Constitution the oath of elected and public servants: The bankrupt U.S.CORPS agreed to absorb the debts of its FORIEGN CITIZENS, so why not let them pay for their debt and I am not to pay for another mans sin and or debts? Its simple and logical. House resolution 192 .The U.S. Supreme Court, in 1895, ruled unconstitutional a federal law... containing unlawful income taxes, their was no such thing as property taxes, senate and house Bills ones birth certificate , under statutes and codes, administration rules with arguments concerning class warfare and the definition of a direct tax. Herein...Ohios Doctrine of Governmental Immunity was held unconstitutional The fact is, property is a tree; income is the fruit; labour is a tree; income the fruit; capital, the tree; income the fruit. The fruit, if not consumed (severed) as fast as it ripens, will germinate from the seed... and will produce other trees and grow into more property; but so long as it is fruit merely, and plucked (severed) to eat... it is no tree, and will produce itself no fruit. Waring v. City of Savennah. 60 Ga. 93, 100 (1878.} The Foreign Agents Registration Act is a United States law (22 U.S.C. § 611 et seq.) passed in 1938 requiring that all public agents representing the interests of foreign powers be properly identified to the American public.[1]; Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, The act was passed in response to German propaganda in the lead-up to World War II. The Foreign Agent Registration Unit within the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice is charged with handling the enforcement of the law and others to numerous to mention heres a few: Welcome - 1940 Census 1940census.archives.gov Welcome to the 1940 census. The 1940 census records were released by the US National Archives April 2, 2012, and brought online through a partnership with Archives Education is the key to your freedoms watch and read with the children. 4 U.S. Code § 101 - Oath by members of legislatures and officers Look up Brandenburg v Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1985). Article 1, section 9 of 1776 Constitution : No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385) passed on June 18, 1878 Every member of a State legislature, and every executive and judicial officer of a State, shall, before he proceeds to execute the duties of his office, take an oath in the following form, to wit: “I, A B, do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution for the United States of America.” 1. Theft and robbery by the government in the guise of “taxation” 2. Government by decree rather than by law 3. Extortion under the color of law in violation 18 U.S.C. §872. 4. Tyranny 5. Socialism 6. Mob rule and a tyranny by the “have-nots” against the “haves” 7. 18 U.S.C. §241: Conspiracy against rights. The IRS shares tax return information with states of the union, so that both of them can conspire to deprive you of your property underneath the Democratic Democracy/Democratic form of Government, thereof. 8. 18 U.S.C. §242: Deprivation of rights under the color of law. The Fifth Amendment says that people in states of the Union cannot be deprived of their property without due process of law or a court hearing. Yet, the IRS tries to make it appear like they have the authority to just STEAL these people’s property for a fabricated tax debt that they aren’t even legally liable for: Ref. The IRS can take no action, Notice of Levy and Lien, against a supposed tax payer until first taking them to court. The case: (1/25/2005) Schulz v. IRS 04-0196-cv 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Cir. Room 1702, U.S. Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York City, NY. 9. 18 U.S.C. §247: Damage to religious property; obstruction of persons in the free exercise of religious beliefs 10. 18 U.S.C. §872: Extortion by officers or employees of the United States. 11. 18 U.S.C. §876: Mailing threatening communications. This includes all the threatening notices regarding levies, liens, and idiotic IRS letters that refuse to justify why government thinks we are “liable”. 18 U.S.C. §880: Receiving the proceeds of extortion. Any money collected from Americans through illegal enforcement actions and for which the contributors are not liable under the law is extorted money, and the IRS is in receipt of the proceeds of illegal extortion. 13. 18 U.S.C. §1581: Peonage, obstructing enforcement. IRS is obstructing the proper administration of the Internal Revenue Code and the Constitution, which require that they respect those who choose NOT to volunteer to participate in the federal donation program identified under Subtitle A of the I.R.C. 14. 18 U.S.C. §1583: Enticement into slavery. IRS tries to enlist “nontaxpayers” to rejoin the ranks of other peons who pay taxes they arent demonstrably liable for, which amount to slavery. 15. 18 U.S.C. §1589: Forced labor. Being forced to expend one’s personal time responding to frivolous IRS notices and pay taxes on my labor that I am not liable for. 16. Public v. Private Employment: You Really Work for Uncle Sam if you Receive Federal Benefits 17. A federal “public official” has no rights in relation to their employer, the federal government: “The restrictions that the Constitution places upon the government in its capacity as lawmaker, i.e., as the regulator of private conduct, are not the same as the restrictions that it places upon the government in its capacity as employer. We have recognized this in many contexts, with respect to many different constitutional guarantees. Private citizens perhaps cannot be prevented from wearing long hair, but policemen can. Kelley v. Johnson, 425 U.S. 238, 247 (1976). Private citizens cannot have their property searched without probable cause, but in many circumstances government employees can. OConnor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709, 723 (1987) (plurality opinion); id., at 732 (SCALIA, J., concurring in judgment). Private citizens cannot be punished for refusing to provide the government information that may incriminate them, but government employees can be dismissed when the incriminating information that they refuse to provide relates to the performance of their job. Gardner v. Broderick, [497 U.S. 62, 95] 392 U.S. 273, 277 -278 (1968). With regard to freedom of speech in particular: Private citizens cannot be punished for speech of merely private concern, but government employees can be fired for that reason. Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 147 (1983). Private citizens cannot be punished for partisan political activity, but federal and state employees can be dismissed and otherwise punished for that reason. Public Workers v. Mitchell, 330 U.S. 75, 101 (1947); Civil Service Commn v. Letter Carriers, 413 U.S. 548, 556 (1973); Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 616 -617 (1973).” [Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois, 497 U.S. 62 (1990)] (Takes 3-persons to form a Corporation) 18. “U.S. Inc.” is a federal corporation, as defined below: Corporations are also of all grades, and made for varied objects; all governments are corporations, created by usage and common consent, or grants and charters which create a bond body politic for prescribed purposes; but whether they are private, local or general, in their objects, for the enjoyment of property, or the exercise of power, they are all governed by the same rules of law, as to the construction and the obligation of the instrument by which the incorporation is made by laws, statutes, Administrative Rules, AKA, Black ink on White Paper. One universal rule of law protects persons and property. It is a fundamental principle of the common law of England, that the term freemen of the kingdom, includes all persons, ecclesiastical and temporal, incorporate, politique or natural; it is a part of their magna charta (2 Inst. 4), and is incorporated into our institutions. The persons of the members of corporations are on the same footing of protection as other persons, and their corporate property secured by the same laws which protect that of individuals. 2 Inst. 46-7. No man shall be taken, no man shall be disseised, without due process of law, is a principle taken from magna charta, Tied to the Court of Common Pleas, infused into all our state constitutions, and is made inviolable by the federal government, by the amendments to the constitution. [Proprietors of Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of Warren Bridge, 36 U.S. 420 (1837)] South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301 (1966) The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a valid exercise of Congresss power under Section 2 of the Fifteenth Amendment. Katzenbach v. Morgan, 384 U.S. 641 (1966) Congress may enact laws stemming from Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment that increase the rights of citizens beyond what the judiciary has recognized. City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997) Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment does not permit Congress to substantially increase the scope of the rights determined by the judiciary. Congress may only enact remedial or preventative measures that are consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment interpretations of the Supreme Court. Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. ___ (2013) Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which contains the coverage formula that determines which state and local jurisdictions are subjected to federal preclearance from the United States Department of Justice before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices based on their histories of racial discrimination in voting, is unconstitutional because it no longer reflects current societal conditions. Whereas, some stats are worth repeating: Corfield v. Coryell, 6 Fed. Cas. 546 (C.C.E.D. Pa. 1823) Some of the rights protected by the Privileges and Immunities Clause include the freedom of movement through the states, the right of access to the courts, the right to purchase and hold property, an exemption from higher taxes than those paid by state residents, and the right to vote. Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957) United States citizens abroad, even when associated with the military, cannot be deprived of the protections of the Constitution and cannot be made subject to military jurisdiction. Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866) Trying citizens in military courts is unconstitutional when civilian courts are still operating. Trial by military tribunal is constitutional only when there is no power left but the military, and the military may validly try criminals only as long as is absolutely necessary. Crandall v. Nevada, 73 U.S. 35 (1868) The freedom of movement is a fundamental right; a state cannot inhibit people from leaving the state by taxing them. Allgeyer v. Louisiana, 165 U.S. 578 (1897) The liberty that is protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment includes economic liberty. United States v. Wheeler, 254 U.S. 281 (1920) The Constitution grants to the states the power to prosecute individuals for wrongful interference with the right to travel. The power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce extends to a restaurant that is not patronized by interstate travelers but which serves food that has moved in interstate commerce. This ruling makes the Civil Rights Act of 1964 apply to virtually all businesses. Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States, 379 U.S. 241 (1964) The Civil Rights Act of 1964 applies to places of public accommodation patronized by interstate traveler by reason of the Commerce Clause. Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294 (1964) United States v. Guest, 383 U.S. 745 (1966) There is a constitutional right to travel from state to state, and the protections of the Fourteenth Amendment extend to citizens who suffer rights deprivations at the hands of private conspiracies where there is minimal state participation in the conspiracy. OConnor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563 (1975) The states cannot involuntarily commit individuals if they are not a danger to themselves or others and are capable of living by themselves or with the aid of responsible family members or friends. SUPREME COURT RULING: Police Have No Duty To Protect The General Public gunssavelives.net/.../supreme-court-ruling-police.../ Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property...and is regarded as UNALIENABLE. 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987. As thy debt collectors for mayor ,city council debts It is not the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect the Corporation and arrest code breakers of elected and public servants.” (Sapp v. Tallahasee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, Reiff v. City of Philadelphia 477 F.Supp. 1262, Lynch v. N.C. Dept of Justice 376 S. E. 2nd. 247.) Palazzolo v. Rhode Island | The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent ... oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2000/2000_99_2047/ EnforcementNotAllowed.18 U.S.C. § 1001 : US Code The Foreign Agents Registration Act is a United States law (22 U.S.C. § 611 et seq.) passed in 1938 requiring that agents representing the interests of foreign powers be properly identified to the American public.[1] The act was passed in response to German propaganda in the lead-up to World War II. The Foreign Agent Registration Unit within the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice is charged with handling the enforcement of the law. The act requires people and organizations that are under foreign control (agents of a foreign principal) to register with the Department of Justice when acting on behalf of foreign interests. This law defines the agent of a foreign principal as someone who: 1. Engages in political activities for or in the interests of a foreign principal; 2. Acts in a public relations capacity for a foreign principal; 3. Solicits or dispenses any thing of value within the United States for a foreign principal; 4. Represents the interests of a foreign principal before any agency or official of the U.S. government.[1] The Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) was enacted in 1938. FARA is a disclosure statute that requires persons acting as agents of foreign principals in a political or quasi-political capacity to make periodic public disclosure of their relationship with the foreign principal, as well as activities, receipts and disbursements in support of those activities. Disclosure of the required information facilitates evaluation by the government and the American people of the statements and activities of such persons in light of their function as foreign agents. The FARA Registration Unit of the Counterespionage Section (CES) in the National Security Division (NSD) is responsible for the administration and enforcement of the Act. Take Mandatory Judicial Notice and Cognizance ( Federal Rules of Evidence 201 (d) that “plaintiff” ie Libellant has a lawful right to proceed without cost, based upon the following law: The US Supreme Court has ruled that a natural individual entitled to relief is “entitled to free access to its judicial tribunals and public offices in every State of the Union(2 Black 620, see also Crandell v Nevada, 6 Wall 35]. Plaintiff (libellant) should not be charged fees or costs for the lawful and Constitutional Right to petition this court in this matter in which he/she is entitled to relief, as it appears that the filing fee rule was originally implemented for fictions and subjects of the State and should not be applied to the Plaintiff who is a natural individual and entitled to relief (Hale v Hinkel, 201 US 43, NAACP v Button, 371 US 415); United Mineworkers v Gibbs, 383 US 715; and Johnson v Avery, 89 S.Ct. 747 (1969). Members of groups who are competent non- lawyers, can assist other members of the group, achieve the goals of the group in court without being charged with “unauthorized practice of law.” Petitioner (libellant) cannot be charged a fee as no charge can be placed upon a citizen as a condition precedent to exercise his/her Constitutional Rights, his/her rights secured by the Constitution. A fee is a charge “fixed by law for services fixed by public officers or for use of a privilege under control of government.” Fort Smith Gas Co. v Wisemen” 189 Ark.675 74 SW.2d 789,790, from Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Ed. Reproduced with permission from 16 Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law (1986) 671-686 ,,cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/pfund.html NOTICE: It is a crime for any government office or any official to auction or otherwise sell in any way, private or business property of any individual WITHOUT FIRST HAVING DUE PROCESS OF LAW, to determine the cause of action and the recourse in law. The sale of any property outside this means is illegal, and all those involved with such a sale, including those purchasing said property, are personally liable for damages, and subject to criminal charges under Racketeering (RIC...O) laws, and for violation of civil and Due Process rights. All government officials have the Greater Duty to know the law and comply with it, and if you are involved with such an auction without Due Process for the owner, you are in breach of your fiduciary duty and you can be held personally liable by those harmed by this fraud. Any challenge to property taxation or property sale made by any citizen requires you to respond, point by point, and to prove up your position in law. We have a right to know If you stand with We the People of these United States of America, now 50, 1776 constitutional laws print copy notarized and Pass on to all peace and god bless Jesus.. link filed papers file with the Queen of England and Vatican filled constitution reference numbers included 1993, 1776 law of the united state of American soil only, by the treaty of 1213 specialcollections.uws.ac.uk/documents/1.pdf specialcollections.uws.ac.uk Merely being native born within the territorial boundaries of the United States of America does not make such an inhabitant a Citizen of the United States subject to the jurisdiction of the Fourteenth Amendment ... Elk v. Wilkins, Neb (1884), 5s.ct.41,112 U.S. 99, 28 L. Ed. 643. The children, women and the men of these union States withdraw all 3rd party contracts, fraud by trickery, un-pronounced to us. edward-malone; johnston [EDWARD MALONE JOHNSTON II ] a Birth Certificate fraud scheme, dead entity; American National, Heir and Successor, Living, Breathing, Bloodline Flowing Human Being. U.C.C. 1-308 All Rights Reserved; edward-malone; johnston (non-corporation); Office of GRANTOR/SETTLER FOR THE: [EDWARD JOHNSTON],[ED JOHNSTON] et al, [Edward Malone Johnston],[Edward M Johnston] et al, TRUST, BONDS, et al, Trust Accounts to include: CESTA QUE VIE TRUST, AKA, ONE PEOPLES PUBLIC TRUST. C/O 1540 north nye street, Toledo area of the Oregon territory [97391-9998] Phone: 541 336 1233 NOTICE OF SERVICE: On this the ____ day of December in the year of our Lord 2014 this document was lawfully served upon all entities listed above via 1st class mail, PRIORITY MAIL, E-mail, and or Facsimile. STATE OF OREGON Affirm JURAT County of Lincoln On this the ________ day of December in the year of our LORD 2014 AD, Before me, a Notary Republic, the signatory ______________________________ personally appeared, edward-malone; johnston C/O 1540 north nye street, Toledo area of the Oregon territory [97391-9998] Phone: 541 336 1233 [x ] known to me, or [x ] satisfactorily proves to be the Natural Human Being whos name is subscribed to this instrument, Sworn and acknowledged that he/she executed the same for the stated purpose thereof. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal. My commission expires _________________________ __________________________________________________ Notary Public (Signature) Seal/Stamp Lines 1 - 526
Posted on: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 23:27:37 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015