Paragraph VII Rest of my argument was to show you how the New Testament differentiates between God and Jesus every time. Instead of showing that there is no differentiation whatsoever Melanie gives us extra-Biblical interpretation which one is not bound to agree with. With her other explanations Melanie (Christians as a whole) commits the fallacy of equivocation where you use an argument where a word refers to something and down below when somebody doesn’t notice the word refers to something else. Melanie starts with the word Jesus referring to God-man, then later on the word Jesus refers only to a man and later when you ask again it refers to the God-man again. One moment it refers to God, the next moment it refers to the Son of God, next moment it refers to both of them. We have to define our terms, what refers to what.
Posted on: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 04:36:46 +0000