Perhaps someone here can answer or speak to this ...I have posted it in every JFK group and I have either been ignored or called names... but here goes... An effective tool for reinforcing the loony conspiricism meme is the introduction of theories that that have no basis in evidence. That having been said, I need to know something... I have always said that sometimes what IS included is more important than what is left out... so my question is a simple one ...why was the testimony of James Tague included and verified with a VIGOR? when the actual facts are so vague and border on absurd... he parked by the underpass, got out of his car and was hit with a bullet fragment that NO ONE KNEW ABOUT at the time nor did it come to national light till much later... it was a year later and made it necessary for Arlen Spector to come up with the magic bullet theory ...when we ALL KNOW that there was much more direct evidence and testimony, much more relevant and much more logical, that was deliberately ignored or unquantified and NOT included in the WC deliberately... some was not even entertained... , but yet they pretty JAMMED THIS down our collective throats... as if the whole theory hinged on this ... If anyone wants to look at this in an OBJECTIVE way and convince me this was not planted evidence, and that the people that write about this as if there is nothing alarming about it and in a way that makes it look like it hurt the WC when in fact I believe that many of the conspiracy theorists are now proven to be deliberately exposing this ...that is BLATANT disinformation. ….he recanted from where he originally said the shot came from and he also said was mistaken about the extra shot...and again, I do find it curious to say the least that so much evidence was not even questioned or included in the WC... but this , and after almost a year was deemed NECESSARY to include, when so much testimony and other facts like about the rifle, or the autopsy or the doctors at Parkland, he bullet hole in the limousine windshield, or the people running and police running up grassy knoll, and of course the Z film itself... you have to wonder why , when evidence was willfully and completely ignored and not included would they include something like this ...A chip on a sidewalk curb???? and that was one of the 3 shots you have to ask yourself WHY??? my point being they left out SO MUCH EVIDENCE and TESTIMONY and at times they BLATANTLY CHANGED the testimony and yet...this , which is inconsistent with THEIR timeline, THEIR theory of the shots , other facts like about the rifle, or the autopsy or the doctors at Parkland, or the people running and police running up grassy knoll, and of course the Z film itself... you have to wonder why , when evidence was willfully and completely ignored and not included would they include something like this ...A chip on a sidewalk curb???? and that was one of the 3 shots you have to ask yourself WHY??? whatever the reason it HAD TO BE TO THEIR BENEFIT as their own means to an end...throwing in a RED HERRING if you will to make people say well, look they did include contradictory evidence which they quickly established a change to their theories almost as if they knew it was coming and they did since the “MAGIC BULLET” was found the day of the assassination on a stretcher bed in the hall at Parkland Hospital, and was not found in or around either victim. It is not known if it was a stretcher that either JFK nor Connally had been on. Mr. Darrell C. Tomlinson, originally found the bullet and called Mr. O.P. Wright, Parkland’s personnel director who then passed it to Special Agent Richard Johnsen ... so the factors were already in place for the SBT long before Tague’s testimony came to light…and please if you can, name me one writer who didnt think this was an accident that it was included... like we had WON a small victory .. I know what their capabilities were and still are ... this was no accident ... It came to me like an epiphany, and it had been looking me in the face for 50 years ...and lastly, Tagues experience was not well known ...and certainly not well publicized..ANOTHER reason to ask WHY??? and if you investigate Tague, you come to know his roommate was dating a woman who worked for Ruby and that Tague himself was going to meet another woman who also worked for Ruby … a coincidence of BIBLICAL proportions it is ...isnt it...WHAT ARE THE ODDS??? Please feel free to send me a private message if you prefer or answer here if possible...Thank you ..
Posted on: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 03:05:34 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015