QUESTIONING THE LIBEL INTELLIGENCE OF THE PROSECUTORS OFFICE, RTC OF MANILA Motion for Judicial Determination of Probable Cause WHEN THE PROSECUTORIAL ARM APPEARS ABUSIVE, THE COURT MUST STRICTLY EXERCISE ITS DISCRETION TO SCRUTINIZE THE FILINGS OF CRIMINAL INFORMATION BY THE OFFICE OF THE CITY PROSECUTOR.S The presiding judge must cease to give respect to all the representations of the Office of the Prosecutor, who arbitrarily file criminal information EVEN WHEN IT CANNOT CLEARLY WIN THE CASE IN COURT and EVEN WHEN THERE IS NO SUFFICIENT PROBABLE CAUSE. The accused here strongly invoke Section 2 of Article III of the Constitution that commands unto the judges: Thou shalt personally determine probable cause for the purpose of a warrant of arrest upon examination under oath of the complainant and the witnesses he may produce. The No. 1 reason why courts are clogged with criminal cases is the Office of the Prosecutor. Often times, the Office of the Prosecutor arbitrarily resolves every criminal complaint in favor of the filing of criminal information in court. Even if the Office of the Prosecutor knows that its case lack evidence to sustain the fight to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, even if the probable cause is so little, it files the same in court “in the name of misguided meaning of probable cause.” The No. 2 reason why courts are clogged with criminal cases is the LENIENCY of the courts to scrutinize the evidence submitted by the prosecution offices. They do these because they give RESPECT to the decisions of the fiscals. But mind you, this RESPECT IS UNDUE. As in the case at bar, the accused are challenging the Court and the Office of the City Prosecutor of Manila to be honest and truthful. With these expressions of disgust, the accused are moving the Honorable Court to PERSONALLY EXAMINE THE POLICE OFFICER WHO FILED THE COMPLAINT FOR LIBEL and the WITNESSES HE MAY PRODUCE to decide whether there is sufficient probable cause that the accused are guilty of two counts of libel and that they must be held for trial. This is mandatory in the name of the Constitution, in the name of fairness, in the name of honesty, and in the name of PRESS FREEDOM. READ MORE: totocausing.blogspot/2013/10/questioning-libel-intelligence-of-city.html
Posted on: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 20:52:35 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015