Read, Subscribe & Cite CONSUMER PROTECTION JUDGMENTS (CPJ) I (2014) CPJ 289 INSURANCE — Lottery tickets — Misappropriation of huge amount — Loss was not direct pecuniary loss caused by act of fraud or dishonestly but a system created to increase sale of lottery tickets, on credit, by concerned employee of complainant, in violation of relevant rules impliedly with complainant’s consent — Surveyor recommended claim to be filed as ‘NO CLAIM’ — Complainant not entitled to claimed amount. I (2014) CPJ 289 LOTTERIES — Commercial Transaction — Insurance policy obtained against embezzlement or fraud by employee — Complainant consumer. I (2014) CPJ 287 POST OFFICE — Speed Post — Electronic item — Non-delivery as item prohibited — Deficiency in service not proved. I (2014) CPJ 281 EXECUTION OF SALE DEED — No evidence of development works — Execution directed without collecting any additional amount. I (2014) CPJ 273 ELECTRICITY CONNECTION — Non-domestic connection — Use of electricity is not intended to generate profit directly or indirectly — Complainant consumer. I (2014) CPJ 263 LPG CYLINDER — Bursting of cylinder — Accident took place because cylinder was old and worn out — Compensation awarded. I (2014) CPJ 259 INSURANCE — Money in transit robbed — Person carrying cash was employee — Reasonable care taken — Repudiation not justified. I (2014) CPJ 247 INSURANCE (CROPS) — Draught — Financial security to farmer under scheme — Premium deducted — Repudiation not justified. I (2014) CPJ 233 INSURANCE — Revival of Policy — Amounts to new contract and fresh declaration is taken at the time of revival of Policy — Acceptance of premium and its retention by insurer not ipso facto render policy revived in absence of acceptance of revival to insured. I (2014) CPJ 225 JURISDICTION — Recovery of loan amount — Proceedings initiated against complainant under SARFAESI Act, 2002 for recovery of loan amount cannot be challenged before Consumer Fora — Remedy lies with Debts Recovery Tribunal by way of appeal. I (2014) CPJ 224 INSURANCE — Coverage under policy — Delay in intimation — Policy was in force when accident occurred — Widow being illiterate woman would have required some time to settle — Unfair trade practice proved — Repudiation not justified. I (2014) CPJ 213 JURISDICTION (TERRITORIAL) — Mere existence of arbitration clause in the document would not oust jurisdiction of Consumer Fora. LIKE US ON FACEBOOK// DLT PUBLICATIONS PVT LTD SHARE IT IF YOU LIKE IT
Posted on: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 05:33:57 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015