STRUCTURE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL THERAPY The transition to larger interpretations of situations can not be accomplished by simple decision of the will, but only by a particular way-finding., Which so far interpreted the situation that characterized addressed fellows are entrained by these higher approach and a reality is created, the in fact means situational improvement and be there moderate enlargement. From the difficulties of existence only leads the way to the higher approach, which is the way of a more comprehensive identification, out. One can only help the people of truth so that in his real life an interpretation is found, which is a higher solution not only for him but also for its environment. The decline to a mere psychological therapy (psycho) therapy is a decrease in the closest subject and can not be considered the decisive factor: the situational reality. Above all, the therapy is following exactly the fear moderate constriction, which has led to the difficulties. In the long run can therefore psychological solutions only deepen the error and harden, which led to the suffering of life, namely to narrow constriction of identification. One must not only work on the experience over and let the reality side of reality completely. A fatalistic like Faktizitätsverständnis is just the reason the Angsteinschnürrung that applies to dissolve it. By the psychoanalysis means to help, she pushes the supposed subject further in his false sense of identity into it, it does not open on its narrowness out into the vastness and richness that is every human being. That is why it is important to replace psychoanalysis through structural analysis. Unfortunately, it was said so that the psychotherapeutic approach, yes is wrong morbid. He distinguishes, as if it were a matter of course, a psychic subject of an objective reality. It thus prevents unintentionally what brings a Icherweiterung or selfhood growth. But it all comes down to this growth. Unfortunately is also affected by what is called sometimes consciousness expansion, not the phenomenon of Sclbstheitswachstums. Even in the case of the expansion of consciousness is assumed that a mental entity consciousness and treats them in yourself. It is not seen that the Subjektitätsstruktur always corresponds to a Objektitätsstruktur and therefore can only be changed so that the world or reality changes this subject. Short and clear: Who does not change very real and concrete living conditions of a subject, does not change this subject. One can manipulate neither consciousness nor his own soul, but you have to help the people in the lived reality. And of course, this assumes a very different commitment. The structural therapist helps the people first in his life needs, ensures that he brings his circumstances (situations) in order and thus has usually taken care of already for the psyche of this man, but only if he that order of the lifeworld (Situationenimplikation has reached and prepared) of the patient, which is the typical of its own structural life approach. Often the person does not know his innermost life approach and builds his world, and his situation consequence after all the models on. Person and roles fall apart; Roles and roles become confused; Identities and identities clash. Theres only a careful structural analysis and following which a consistent and realistic structure therapy. The real world must be sought and be built. The man, his world has found is healing in a deep sense and healthy. The man who must live in a strange, very different structured world is unhappy, sick and stupid. All negativity comes to man from the outside - and all the positivity from the inside. Those who find themselves in such a way that he finds his world - and who finds his world so that he thus also finds its identity, lives with his reality idemisch. And that is, healthy, healing, happy. Who goes only to self-discovery, will not find anything. Who goes only to world-discovery, will achieve nothing. Who both so anzielt that one of the other shows, so that he finds the self only in relation to a particular world and the world only in terms of a particular self - and in konkreativer, the development possibilities of his contemporaries and environmental actively involves who is experienced a success, beyond wearing it about yourself and a realistic way to identify with the identity itself (God, life, fate) is. Meanwhile, self-expanding, but only as selfless self as the Zen Buddhist says. Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy only work on self delusional self - and this will always be sick and stay sick; it is the disease of the self. Structural analysis and structural therapy work on selfless self and if it succeeds, provide the actual chen nature of health, namely that health, salvation means at the same time. Outside of the salvation there is no health. Rein in psychological immanence is nothing to cause, unless a semblance of life, which hopefully lasts just as long until the psychotherapist has written his healing report. More important than all the reports of healing but rail us the simple statement of the recidivism rate, which could be the basis for a new, lower-faceted consideration. Outside of the salvation there is no health. This must of course again not now be religious misunderstood, although a religious interpretation of the salvation is quite possible. Salvation can a person outside the religion, as he experienced evil even within a religion can. The salvation, we mean here is a anthroponome, a structural anthropological category, which can appear only at the end of our deliberations with absolute clarity. In this context, it should be clear still how the structure of Anthropology and her anthroponomes, mankind legal thinking on religion and religions is, it should be said again that she is looking to break the previous anthropocentrism and religion in a very specific maintains a sense of indispensable. But not every religion has this religion that is meant here - or any religion can have this religion, they enter are located in an inner increase event that it leads to that top position, in which the (dogmatic) Unlike other religions, and so that what is commonly called religion, is immaterial. The history of religions urges inherent attention to such self-transcendence, so that the structure anthropology need only say what has been all developed latent. Although she has a very specific and certainly not often encountered notion of religion, they need this, none of the historical religions impose and also needs no developed, seemingly non-religious humanism a faith aufzunötigen that this will not accept and does not need to accept. Also, no religion is this religion, we mean, and what may be called the religion of humanity to have. It goes without the decisive step that does not have the distinctions of this world and the hereafter, time and eternity. The structure of anthropology does not like of mental, mind and body diseases, but sees all as disturbed relationships within the whole life structure, and even a broken leg is the very fact that he was at all possible, symptom and expression of another break within the forest. Often, the way a symbolic, symptomatic or pictorial body disease is a good approach for a self-therapy with regard to distant situational distortions, such as social art Man and nature, self and world, mind and reality, patient and therapist, science and life beyond does not. - And so it is initially very much depend on whether the insight is to convey that the subject-object separation, the underlying psychology and psychotherapy as a science, is already the disease, and that all patients who are treated at this level , are transported from one disease to another. But just as it will depend on the insight that the reified distinction in the God-man scheme is the same illness, and eternal evil that aside and overcome the meaning and content of religious action is. But just as psychotherapy in a certain self-misunderstanding a symptom of the disease is that it seeks to heal, so religion is in a certain self-misunderstanding of the evil which they will redeem us. But who now thinks that is so spoken in the sense of self-importance of the man who has the approach fundamentally misunderstood, because this is just the resolute negation of anthropocentrism, which is in the previous approaches. This anthropocentrism is the disease.
Posted on: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:07:58 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015