Shia Are Kafirs Here Are The Proofs 22-06-07 Alhamdullilah that Allah عزو جل has blessed this Ummah to become Noble once again through the fields of the battlefield that erupt with the cries of الله اكبر and the screams of لاإله إلا الله, for the purpose of gaining the ultimate nearness to Allah عزو جل. The land of ‘Iraq – may Allah maintain it for the Muslims and repel its evil inhabitants – before the Jihad, was a land mostly full of Kufr and Shirk. It was a land where the majority of its men lived blindly under the Taaghoot. After the Jihad was revived, Baatil found itself surrounded and ambushed by the Haqq. Yes, Baatil was finally cornered by the sharp swords of the Haqq in a land which almost nobody expected its revival. The Haqq entered into ‘Iraq and it did a major thing which was bitter to many, but a healing to the breasts of the believers. It polarized the society between those who are in the camp of Imaan and those who are in the camp of Kufr. It exposed and revealed to us the inner reality of the ugly nature of Ahlul Bid’ah and at-Taaghoot. The Jihad in ‘Iraq showed us that the Sunni’s are not the brothers of the Rawaafid nor are they the brothers of the Apostates. Rather, Ahlus Sunnah is to be only united with those under its same pure banner. Those who fail to look at the war in ‘Iraq from the perspective of ‘Aqeedah will always live in a world of deception. Sometimes we find them cursing the Americans and saying, “The invasion brought strife between the Sunni and Shi’a communities; this never happened under Saddam!” While we are happy that they curse the Americans, we are not happy with their misleading conclusion. The Muslims must understand why it is a blessing of Allah that there is a conflict between the two communities. If the Muslims think unity is possible with a people that revile the Sahaabah, are extreme in bid’ah and in many cases Shirk, then they have to ask themselves: Do you want this unity under the banner of who the common enemy is or under the banner of لاإله إلا الله? And No Walahi by a million times should one accept the statement, “The Shi’as say the Kalimah and so do the Sunni’s, so it is a pure banner…” since our Ummah has a long history of those who fought against those that professed the Kalimah, such as the wars of Riddah during the Khilaafah of Abu Bakr al-Siddeeq (رضى الله عنه). So if the crime of the Apostates during his time was the leaving-off of the Zakaat, what then to say about the ones who revile the majority of the Sahaabah (including Abu Bakr, ‘Umar, and Uthmaan), reject the ahadeeth of Ahlus Sunnah, and commit a type of Shirk which in itself expels them from the religion? If unity with the Murtaddeen was to be rejected as a consensus (Ijmaa’) amongst the Sahaabah, then what to say about these filthy Rawaafid? After all, how would one be fighting a Jihad that is fe Sabeelillah when they have taken as friends and supporters those who insult the Sahaabah? That kind of struggle would not be purely for Allah’s sake, but it would be a struggle that is stuck in mud and yuck with taints of Asaabiyyah (nationalism). We base our Jihad on ‘Aqeedah and not the customs. If we were to base it on anything except ‘Aqeedah, then what kind of a mess would we be in if we were to successfully repel the Kuffaar? What kind of a State would arise? A Sunni-Shi’a State? Or do we want a state that strictly follows Ahlus Sunnah and refrains from Shi’asm and every other ism? Therefore I advise my brothers and sisters to fear Allah in this matter as this issue is not a simple one where anyone can just unite with these people. This is an issue of sticking to the Truth as much as possible and refraining from all types of falsehood as much as possible. Before we expose the filth of the Raafidah Shi’a, we must define who the Raafidah Shi’as are. Some good sources on who they are can be found in: 1. Maqaalaatul-Islaamiyyeen (l/65) 2. Al-Farq Baynal-Firaq (no.21) of ’Abdul-Qaadir al- Baghdaadee 3. Talbees Iblees (p. 94-100) of Ibnul-Jawzee The Raafidah (the rejectors) are an extreme sect of the Shi’a who rejected Zayd Ibn ’Alee Ibnul- Husayn (rahimahullah) due to his refusal to condemn Abu Bakr al-Siddiq and ’Umar ibn al-Khattab (radiyallaahu ’anhumaa). They rapidly deteriorated in ’Aqeeda, morals and Religion - until the present day where their beliefs are those represented by the Ithnaa ’Ashariyyah Shi’a of Iran. From their false beliefs are: a) Declaring all but three or five of the Sahaba to be Kafir, b) The belief that their Imam’s have knowledge of the Unseen past, present and future, c) Considering the Imaamah to be one of the main pillars of Iman d) The incompleteness of the Qur’an. If one wants to sincerely look into their crooked ‘Aqeeda for the purpose of having dalaa’il from their side that they are themselves evil, then one should read their famous book of “hadith” which they consider the most authentic (like we consider Bukhari the most authentic) called, “Asool Kaafi.” One doesn’t need page references to where the corruption in the book is since it is everywhere in the book! Let me again remind our readers that this Ummah can only and only unite upon Tawheed; and Tawheed comes from ‘Aqeeda. So whosoever has a deviant ‘Aqeeda cannot be part of the unification process since the ‘Aqeeda is the foundation. As long as the foundation is weak, the process of unification will not only take longer but it will also be detrimental in the end and collapse. If there were to be a Sunni-Raafidah Shi’a unity against the Kafir forces in ‘Iraq, then even if the repelling of the Kuffar comes out successful, the question of “What to do next” will cause havoc since the people of the Sunnah want to live by the Shari’ah as understood by Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah and the Shi’a would want to live by their corrupt Shi’a State; and we know very well in the fiqh of Jihad that we are not allowed to give up any piece of land or even a hand-span of land to those that oppose us (i.e., that don’t rule by what Allah has revealed). Furthermore, the Raafidah Shi’a are indeed Murtadeen (as we will come to see) so treating them like Muslims is out of the question as well as Jizya. Therefore, there is no practical solution with the Raafidah Shi’a except force since they are not even a sect within Islam; they are Murtadeen and the hudood must be implemented on them unless if they accept the true Islam. The same goes for the Ahmadiyya group who thinks they are a part of Islam. So what have our Imam’s of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah said regarding these Raafidah Shi’a? We will only quote a few here because of the amount of limited space here and its repetition: [1] Imam Maalik Ibn Anas (d.179H): It is related by al-Khallaal (d.311H), from Abee Bakr al-Marroodhee who said: I heard Abaa ’Abdullah saying: Maalik said, “The one who reviles the Companions of the Prophet (sallallahu ’alayhe wassallam) does not have any share in Islam.” (as-Sunnah (2/557) of Abu Bakr al-Khallaal) And when Ibn Katheer (d.774H) mentioned the statement of Allah the Glorified and Exalted, مُّحَمَّدٌ رَّسُولُ ٱللَّهِ وَٱلَّذِينَ مَعَهُ أَشِدَّآءُ عَلَى ٱلْكُفَّارِ رُحَمَآءُ بَيْنَهُمْ تَرَاهُمْ رُكَّعاً سُجَّداً يَبْتَغُونَ فَضْلاً مِّنَ ٱللَّهِ وَرِضْوَاناً سِيمَاهُمْ فِي وُجُوهِهِمْ مِّنْ أَثَرِ ٱلسُّجُودِ ذَلِكَ مَثَلُهُمْ فِي ٱلتَّوْرَاةِ وَمَثَلُهُمْ فِي ٱلإِنجِيلِ كَزَرْعٍ أَخْرَجَ شَطْأَهُ فَآزَرَهُ فَٱسْتَغْلَظَ فَٱسْتَوَىٰ عَلَىٰ سُوقِهِ يُعْجِبُ ٱلزُّرَّاعَ لِيَغِيظَ بِهِمُ ٱلْكُفَّارَ Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah; and those with him are forceful against the disbelievers, merciful among themselves. You see them bowing and prostrating [in prayer], seeking bounty from Allah and [His] pleasure. Their mark is on their faces from the trace of prostration. That is their description in the Torah. And their description in the Gospel is as a plant which produces its offshoots and strengthens them so they grow firm and stand upon their stalks, delighting the sowers - so that Allah may enrage by them the disbelievers. (Al-Fath: 29) He stated, “So due to this ayah, Imam Maalik (rahimahullah) inclined, in one narration from him, towards takfeer of the Rawaafid who hate the Companions (radiyallaahu ’anhum). He said: Because they enraged them, and whosoever enrages the Companions (radiyallaahu ’anhum), then he is a Kafir due to this ayah. And a group from amongst the Scholars agreed with him upon that.” (Tafseer (4/219) of Ibn Katheer) And al-Qurtubee (d.671H) commented, “Indeed, Maalik did well in his statement and he reached the correct explanation. So whoever belittles a single one of them or reviles him in his narration, then he has rejected Allah, the Lord of the worlds and he has nullified the Shari’ah of the Muslims.” (Tafseer (16/297) of al-Qurtubee) [2] Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal (d.241H): Many narrations have been related from him concerning takfeer of the Raafidah. It is related by al-Khallaal (d.311H), from Abee Bakr al-Marroodhee who said: I asked Abaa ’Abdullah about the one who reviles Abu Bakr, ’Umar and ’Aa‘ishah. He said, “I do not consider him a Muslim.” And al-Khallaal said: ’Abdul-Malik Ibn ’Abdul-Hameed informed me saying: I heard Abaa ’Abdullah say: “Whosoever reviles the Companions (radiyallahu ’anhum), then I fear disbelief for him like the Rawaafid.” Then he said, “Whosoever reviles the Companions of the Prophet (sallallahu ’alayhe wassallam), then we do not believe he is safe from having rejected the Religion.” (as-Sunnah (2/557-558) of al-Khallaal) And he said: ’Abdullah Ibn Ahmad Ibn Hanbal informed me saying: I asked my father about a man who reviled a man from amongst the Companions of the Prophet (sallallahu ’alayhe wassallam). So he said, “I do not hold him to be upon Islam.” (as-Sunnah (2/558) of al-Khallaal) And Imam Ahmad also said, “They are those who free themselves from the Companions of Muhammad (sallallahu ’alayhe wassallam) and they curse them and belittle them. They declare the Imam’s (i.e., Sahaba) disbelievers, except four: ‘Ali, ‘Ammar, al-Miqdaad and Salmaan. And the Raafidah do not have anything to do with Islam.” (Usoolus-Sunnah (p. 82) of Ahmad Ibn Hanbal) Ibn ’Abdul-Qawee said, “And Imam Ahmad used to declare disbelievers all those who freed themselves from them (i.e. the Companions) and whosoever reviled ’Aa‘ishah, the mother of the Believers and accused her of that which she was free from. And he used to recite, يَعِظُكُمُ ٱللَّهُ أَن تَعُودُواْ لِمِثْلِهِ أَبَداً إِن كُنتُمْ مُّؤْمِنِينَ Allah forbids you from it and warns you not to repeat the like of it forever, if you are believers. (An-Noor: 17) [3] Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (d.728H): Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullah) said, “Whosoever claims that ayaat are missing, or have been concealed from the Qur’an, or he claims that its ayaat have inner meanings that cancel out the outward Shari’ah actions, then there is no disagreement concerning his disbelief. And whosoever claims that the Companions became apostates after the Messenger of Allah (sallallahu ’alayhe wassallam), except for a small group that did not reach ten odd people in number, or that the majority of them were disobedient sinners, then there is also no doubt about the disbelief of this one. This is because he has denied what the Qur‘an stipulates in more than one place about Allah being pleased with them and praising them. Rather, who can doubt in the disbelief of this one? So his disbelief is specific, since this statement implies that the carriers of the Book and the Sunnah were disbelievers or disobedient sinners. And with regards to the ayah, كُنْتُمْ خَيْرَ أُمَّةٍ أُخْرِجَتْ لِلنَّاسِ You are the best nation raised up for mankind. (al-‘Imraan: 110) And the best of the Ummah is its first generation, but if they were generally disbelievers and disobedient sinners, then this is the most evil of nations and the early generations of this nation are the most evil ones within it. And the disbelief of such a person is known from the Religion of Islam by necessity.” (as-Saarimul-Maslool (p. 586-587) of Ibn Taymiyyah) And he also said about the Raafidah, “They are more evil than most of the people of desires, and they are more deserving of being killed than the Khawaarij.”(Majmoo’ul-Fataawaa (28/482) of Ibn Taymiyyah) [4] Imam al-Bukhari (d.256H): Imam al-Bukhari (d.256H) (rahimahullah) said, “I do not give any consideration to praying behind a Jahmee and a Raafidee, nor praying behind a Jew and a Christian. They are not to be greeted, nor are they to be visited, nor are they to be married, nor is their testimony to be accepted, nor are their sacrifices to be eaten.” (Khalq Af’aalul-’Ibaad (p. 125) of al-Bukhari) [5] Ibn Hazm adh-Dhaahiree (d.456H): Ibn Hazm (rahimahullah) said, “And there is no disagreement amongst anyone from the sects that ascribe to Islam from Ahlus-Sunnah, the Mu’tazilah,the Khawaarij,the Murji‘ah and the Zaydiyyah concerning the obligation of accepting the Qur‘an that are recited by us… The only people who oppose that are the extreme Rawaafid, and they are polytheistic disbelievers due to that according to all the people of Islam. So our speech does not concern them, since our speech only deals with the people of our Religion.” (al-Ihkaam (1/96) of Ibn Hazm) [6] Abu Haamid al-Ghazaali (d.505H): Al-Ghazaali, al-Hujjatul Islam, said, “Due to the shortcomings in the understanding of the Rawaafid about Allah, they believe that He changes His view. And they quote from ’Alee (radiyallahu ’anhu) that Allah would not inform about the Unseen out of fear that He – the Exalted – would change His view concerning it and would thus change His ruling. And they mentioned about Ja’far Ibn Muhammad that he would say: Allah would change His view based upon new information just as He did with Ismaa’eel (’alayhis-salaam) after commanding him to sacrifice his son… And this is clear disbelief and it involves attributing ignorance and changing of views based upon new information to Allah the Exalted.” (al-Mustasfaa (1/110) of al-Ghazaali) [7] al-Haafidh Ibn Katheer (d.774H): Ibn Katheer (rahimahullah) mentioned the ahadith that are confirmed in the Sunnah and which comprise a negation of the claims of the Raafidah about the revelation. Then he followed this up by saying, “And if the affair had been as they claimed, no one from amongst the Companions would have confirmed that. Since, they were the most obedient to Allah and His Messenger (sallallahu ’alayhe wassallam) during his life and after his death. So it is not possible that they would undermine him, such that they would give precedence to other than the one whom he had given precedence to, or that they would defer one to whom he had given precedence to via his text. May Allah forbid such a thing, it would never happen! And whosoever suspects such a thing about the Companions (ridwaanullaahi ’alayhim), then he has attributed to them that they united upon disobedience and agreed upon stubborn rejection of the Messenger (sallallahu ’alayhe wassallam) and opposition to his ruling and his text. And whosoever from amongst the people reaches such a level, then he has thrown off the yoke of Islam from his neck and he has disbelieved according to the consensus (ijmaa’) of the Imams’ and outstanding personalities. And spilling his blood is more lawful than spilling wine.” (al-Bidaayah wan-Nihaayah (5/252) of Ibn Katheer)
Posted on: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 07:54:35 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015