Silence Realistically and Rationally What do you really mean - TopicsExpress



          

Silence Realistically and Rationally What do you really mean by: it ain’t silences call...It’s factitys call absolutely”?? * -- Adnan *Referring to “YouReality…YouRadiatity” – Mar 17, 2014 -------------------------------------------- Well, I know the deep concerns of some fellows as well as some intelligentsias about the essence and role of silence in human life... I do know what idealism generally, and spiritualism and psychicalism specifically hold for silence in the human developing process and wellbeing course... Historically, silence has been given methodically an overemphasized value based upon some idealistic creeds of religious roots merged with some psychical experimentations and ecstatical experiences interpreted conceptually and orientedly to meet preset doctrinal views… Whether silence means quietness, stillness or muteness, it’s a kind of mere negation… Even if it would indicate calmness or peacefulness or inner awareness metaphorically or exaggeratingly and overestimatingly, it’s also a kind of sophisticated negation… Probably the majority of spiritual trends are under the pressure and zealous pursue of salvation and nirvana overwhelmed terribly by the dilemma of pain and agony i.e. the presence of negativity in factity… Hence, what spiritualism gets from silence in terms of calm and peace or inner awareness contradicts fully with what realism gets… Fundamentally, realism in general and ontosophy in specific trace no negativity of any kind and source in factity absolutely… Nothing is out there in reality but positivities exclusively… Positivities need no salvation or nirvana to be satisfactorily fulfilled… They only need apt and adequate improvement and enhancement… They only need dynamicity and transcendence… That’s how positivity works in our human life… It’s a relentless quest for persistent transcendentality via effectual dynamicity towards apposite and satisfactory optimality… Is there actually silence in existence in terms of negation as previously mentioned…??!! Far away from mentally illusive fabrications or spiritually ecstatical figurations, silence doesn’t exist realistically, objectively and positively… Existence speaks everywhere in different suitable forms under different appropriate conditions… Existence never quit (quitting is negation) to express itself via infinite phases and norms of splendor manifestations and fascinating appearances… Not only the eyes or the ears speak… Not only the tissues or nervous cells speak… But also each and every molecule and atom speaks… Each and every electron, neutron and proton speaks as well… They all express themselves in own ways and norms… Yet, our ignorant arrogant mental principalizations refuse to conform to realities as long as these realities don’t conform to our idealities… Our stiff rigid twisted awareness (if it’s allowed to be called awareness essentially) held speech for the customarily and commonly known way of talk… Hence, when we’re not engaged in talking to somebody and thus seem to be silent outwardly, we’re in fact talking existentially in various abundant different ways, styles and features… Even when we’re not emitting or producing sounds in the well-known physiological procedure, our tongue, its tissues, its nerve cells, its molecules, its atoms, etc. are all speaking in own existential ways and types… Even when we’re not speaking the habitual way, our eyes, our body posture, our body movement or stillness are all speaking their own way and mode… That was all about the physical or corporal level of the human reality… What about the conceptual/mental psychical mode of being (the mind)??!! What about the emotional/sentimental psychical mode of being (the sentiment)???!! What about the essential/central mode of being (the self/heart)??!! What about the intellectual/noetical mode of being (the intellect/nous)??!! There’s no way for silence to be out there in factity by all means… What stiff opinion-oriented idealists and zealous ecstatical spiritualists get from silence in terms of peace, calm or inner enlightenment ain’t called silence in realism absolutely… Still, there’s no harm to call peace, calm, awareness or illumination exotic names such as silence or even muteness as to realism, when it comes to hectic nonacademic terminology… What we’re talking about here is the factual essence of silence precisely not expressions, impressions, conceptions or even emotions… If it were about names, titles or conceptions, realism wasn’t ready or available at all to interfere in… As to peace, calm, awareness, illumination, etc., they are all diverse forms of positivity in reality with different yet apt and adequate levels in factity… Hence, there’s no silence in existence realistically and ontosophically by all means, since silence won’t be ever rationally and realistically factual but mere mental figurative negations pointing symbolically at certain levels of speech in reality… -- Transcendental PhiloSofia – Mar 18, 2014
Posted on: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:05:42 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015