So. Do I go the Global Warming Irony, thy name is The New York Times route? Or do I simply point out that Global Warming, at its core, presumes anywhere from a 1.5°C to a 3°C per *century* increase in temperatures (and note the IPCC have backed off with the latest predictions of a 4.5° to 6°C/century increase), which means that over the course of 10 or even 20 years, assuming a worse case scenario, the 0.3°C to 0.6°C temperature increase predicted is drowned out in the normal annual temperature swings from summer to winter--meaning at most, unless we theorize a (rather un-scientific) tipping point, global warming will only decrease the statistical average number of snow days by a couple of days? (Meaning if increasing the Earths average temperature by 1°F could cause such catastrophic consequences as has been predicted by Global Warming advocates, then the decades-long El Nino/La Nina cycle should have wiped out all life on this planet millennia ago.)
Posted on: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:10:09 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015