So, Im sitting here contemplating philosophy about the skeptics in this group. They say, you claim an unscientifically acknowledged animal, now you better show proof.....or shut up and go away-haha. So here is my request to the skeptics: most of them claim that evolution is science, so dont question it, for I/they are/am science minded. This is absolutely unscientific. In science you cant claim to know it all. So, for the people in this group, skeptic or not, if you can prove an additional genetic, naturally selected, positive mutation; I will concede. Alas, if you do have proof, and show it here, you will be a wealthy man/woman--so what are you waiting for? I will await the best answers/guesses/followers to this question: can you prove, without a doubt, that positive, additional, genetic, naturally selected, mutations have been identified (via published journal--name the journal)? If you say replication is additional, you arent worth my time. If you say Nylonase you arent worth the time either. If you say frameshift mutation, your wiki skills are short of coloring with crayons. I will wait as long as I can.......Dawkins, step aside, for a BF group is about to take your crown.
Posted on: Sat, 04 Oct 2014 03:42:15 +0000