Someone sent me an email asking about the 28 redacted pages… this is some of the information I sent to them… it’s a good little rant so I figured I would share… One of the bigger stories being ignored by the corporate media is the fact that the 9/11 Commission absolved them. That Philip Zelikow is now referring to the information in the 28 redacted pages as wild accusations. The 9/11 Commission supposedly investigated what was within the 28 redacted pages, and absolved them. They spoke to most of the people involved. People like al-Bayoumi, Basnan, Bandar, etc... You can read the Memoranda for The Record for each of them here... archives.gov/research/9-11/commission-memoranda.html Now, here are some of the MFRs that say VERY interesting things... Osama Basnan - Interviewed by Dieter Snell media.nara.gov/9-11/MFR/t-0148-911MFR-01193.pdf The interview failed to yield any new information of note. Instead, in the writers opinion, it established beyond cavil the witness utter lack of credibility on virtually every material subject. Fahad al Thumairy - Interviewed by Dieter Snell and Mike Jacobson media.nara.gov/9-11/MFR/t-0148-911MFR-01240.pdf Our general impression of Thumairy is that he was deceptive during both interviews. Saud al-Rashid - Interviewed by Dieter Snell and Mike Jacobson media.nara.gov/9-11/MFR/t-0148-911MFR-01240.pdf We believe that al-Rasheed was being deceptive. His our impression that he has had enough time to develop a coherent story and is sticking to it (and that he even may have been coached at some point). Here is Bandars MFR... see anything wrong with this picture? media.nara.gov/9-11/MFR/t-0148-911MFR-01177.pdf So, some of the people they interviewed werent trustworthy, and yet, Saudi Arabia was absolved. Who helped to do that? Philip Zelikow refused half of the interview requests for Saudi investigators. Dana Leseman, someone who came from the Joint Congressional Inquiry, and is someone who HELPED TO AUTHOR the 28 redacted pages, was refused access to them by Philip Zelikow. As a result, she went through a back channel to get those pages, and Zelikow fired her. Philip Zelikow and Dieter Snell took part in a late night editing session to remove Saudi support for the hijackers from the report, and moved it into a footnote in the back of the book. So, we have one report that says one thing, and the definitive account of 9/11 that says something else. Bandar asked for the release of those 28 redacted pages probably knowing FULL WELL that Bush would never release them. Now, with all of that being said, you CAN NOT point a finger at Saudi Arabia and not have 5 fingers pointing back to the United States. We protected their support for terrorism for years before 9/11, and years after 9/11. Look up Robert Wright and Vulgar Betrayal among other things. We used that connection to terrorism to further agendas. George Tenet was great friends with Bandar. Bush was great friends with Bandar. I talk about this and more during my interview with Paul Church. Available here... https://youtube/watch?v=aqia7wiXz2w It should be noted that Dieter Snell provided testimony so a court in America could rule that Iran was behind 9/11. It should also be noted that Eliot Spitzer got him out of testifying at the Able Danger hearings. Sent one more email… One thing I forgot is that the reason the families want the 28 redacted pages released is so they can bring them into a court room. When 9/11 makes it into a court room, a whole bunch of things are generally exposed. Look at Moussaouis sentencing phase, or this recent story... nypost/2014/10/05/airport-security-ignored-pre-911-warnings-on-hijackers-court-docs/ At least three eyewitnesses spotted al Qaeda hijackers casing the security checkpoints at Boston’s Logan Airport months before the 9/11 attacks. They saw something and said something — but were ignored, newly unveiled court papers reveal. Which is why I think so many people fought against bringing KSM and company into a Federal Court, and not just because of torture.
Posted on: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 05:06:19 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015