Sorry to have to break the news, our Queen is sadly, quite mad. It is not really her fault to be bonkers as she is - she was brainwashed from childhood to believe she is a special human being with special blood in her veins and that she was chosen by god to wear a crown and be a queen and look down on people... Ah - i sense some of you still dont really get the gist of just HOW mad she is. So, lets try this; Your family, many centuries ago, stole a set of islands, you put slaves on those islands and then, over time they won their freedom. 300 years later, those islands are now the homeland of the ex-slaves and you have virtually forgotten about them and have shown little interest in the islands for the last half century. Suddenly, a rich American arrives at your mansion door (you are exceptionally wealthy and have everything you could ever possibly need), he wants to lease your islands for his military base and evict all the inhabitants to Mauritius (which is about 1,000 miles away from their homeland), where they will be rehoused on a derelict housing estate with smashed in windows, no sanitation, no jobs, where they will live in abject poverty, isolated from the people of the foreign land that is now their home and where many of them will die of sadness, but, before you evict the people, first you must shoot all their dogs and pets and explain to them you will be next if you dont leave... He is offering you $1 a year for the lease. What would be your response? You hold 3,000 lives in the palm of your hand. Do you throw those lives onto a social SCRAP HEAP for sake of $1 a year? Maybe you might just want a strong alliance with this American - maybe you might consider a deal if the islanders were offered compensation? But suppose they refuse to leave? The American wants the islands empty - still, 3,000 lives at stake... A human being would tell that American to GET LOST. The Queen said; WHERE DOES ONE SIGN? In 1966 Britain secretly leased Diego Garcia [main Chagos Island] to the US for 50 years, with the option of an extension. This was done in exchange for a discount of millions of dollars on Polaris nuclear submarines – a way of concealing the payment. The US pays rent of one dollar per year. The deal was not disclosed to the US Congress, the British Parliament, or the United Nations. chagossupport.org.uk/background/history By 1971, the last 1,500 inhabitants from Diego Garcia were forcibly evicted from the only lands they had ever known. Though in recent years, a UK High Court ruling granting the islanders the right to return home, the Queen, after initially over-ruling the High Court judgement by order of an ancient right of a royal decree and making the islands into a conservation area - Exiled Chagos Islanders have lost their fight against the Government over the construction of a marine park in the region. news.sky/story/1102064/chagos-islands-court-defeat-over-marine-park A US diplomatic cable released by WikiLeaks recorded a Foreign Office officials assertion that establishing a marine park would, in effect, put paid to resettlement claims of the archipelagos former residents, who were described as Man Fridays. theguardian/world/2014/apr/21/chagos-islands-diego-garcia-base-court-ruling She was nonetheless, forced to appeal in April 2014 on the grounds that the military base, supporting 5,000 USA troops, is now a marine conservation area and that the islands could not support the 3,000 islanders that might have rights to return to their homelands. Environmental issues are being hijacked under a Chagos Conservation Trust petition to save the Chagos Islands as a world marine heritage. The CCT, a conservation group, mysteriously has the full backing of the British Government, and has military officers on its managerial team. The CCT refuses to recognise the indigenous inhabitants who were evicted to live in exile - and is also silent about the islands being used as a bombing runway and secret prison by the US military. This looks suspiciously like a sneaky ploy to dupe the public - with the real aim being to keep the islanders out and the US secret base in. Activists need to write in to the CCT and ask them the embarrassing questions they are trying to avoid. indymedia.org.uk/en/2010/02/445576.html The Chagos Marine Protected Area is the largest contiguous... no-take marine reserve in the world, covering a total surface area of 640,000 square kilometres – over twice the surface area of the UK. No-take marine reserves are areas of the sea in which there is no fishing allowed and as little other human disturbance as can be reasonably arranged. It is theoretically illegal for anyone to fish there, however, an exemption in the MPA allows people from the US nuclear base on Diego Garcia to continue fishing. In 2010, more than 28 tonnes of fish was caught for use by personnel on the base. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chagos_Marine_Protected_Area Meanwhile, The Independent revealed in its online edition, Saturday, March 15, that the clearest waters in the world are polluted by the U.S. Navy . These waters are part of themarine protected area declared by London. business.mega.mu/2014/03/17/chagos-london-considering-restocking/ In April this year, Mauritius, on behalf of the Chagossians, challenged the legality of the marine protected area announced by the then foreign secretary, David Miliband, in April 2010. The case was heard behind closed doors by the permanent court of arbitration, in the neutral territory of Istanbul Turkey. The (PCA), is a UN-backed tribunal that resolves disagreements between states. Its rulings are binding. The results of this case are quite unclear - it appears another feasibility-study is being done to assess whether or not the islands can support the 3,000 people with rights to return. The Wikileaks document, showing a clear case of malicious intent on creation of the marine-reserve (which was done without the consent or consultation of Mauritius under whose maritime jurisdiction the seas lie), was deemed indamissable because it was a leaked diplomatic document = evidence of corruption at the highest levels of power is NOT admissable in the International Courts. AND, where ELSE, could anyone get evidence of such corruption EXCEPT via LEAKS? However, the conflict between Mauritius maritime rights and creation of the queens marine park remain in a legal tangle, with the upshot being that islanders might get a chance to return home after about 40 years... They have a thousand and one reasons for doing the things they do and NONE of them are reasonable under Universal Law, which by the way, the Queen swore on oath before God and signed a WRITTEN CONTRACT to SERVE. https://youtube/watch?v=AEhVNzHI4rQ
Posted on: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 02:56:31 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015