TAX PROTESTER STORY Guess I made the head lines in Coldwater Michgan. As a tax protester, with no facts, evidence, competent fact wittiness or no jurisdiction shown on the record of any kind, to even hear the case in a Jackson County or was I ever lawfully served notice. Only statements of a BAR CARD ATTORNEY that don,t follow laws or rules in order to drive over a hundred thousand people from their homes and lands using illegal simulated legal process in order to circumvent the the Fifth amendment right of the people here in Michigan. What did the US Supreme Court rule seven times now, on this kind of perverted actions. and the perverted ATTORNEYS still do it and JUDGES allow it. There being no attempt to state actual facts through a competent fact witness, this court cannot notice the conclusory materials contained in Richburg’s so-called statement of facts; for as all competent legal advisors know, a party cannot be both witness and counsel in the same cause. See United States v. Lovasco (06/09/77) 431 U.S. 783, 97 S. Ct. 2044, 52 L. Ed. 2d 752, Gonzales v. Buist. (04/01/12) 224 U.S. 126, 56 L. Ed. 693, 32 S. Ct. 463, Holt v. United States, (10/31/10) 218 U.S. 245, 54 L. Ed. 1021, 31 S. Ct. 2, Telephone Cases. Dolbear v. American Bell Telephone Company, Molecular Telephone Company v. American Bell Telephone Company. American Bell Telephone Company v.. Molecular Telephone Company, Clay Commercial Telephone Company v. American Bell Telephone Company, People’s Telephone Company v. American Bell Telephone Company, Overland Telephone Company v. American Bell Telephone Company,. (PART TWO OF THREE) (03/19/88) 126 U.S. 1, 31 L. Ed. 863, 8 S. Ct. 778, and Trinsey v. Pagliaro, D. C. Pa. 1964, 229 F. Supp. 647 Courts action is simple void on there face, but because I say so, but because it is fact as evidenced here. Austin v. Smith, 312 F. 2d 337, 343 (D.C. Cir. 1962) Judge has no subject matter jurisdiction where an order/judgment is based on a VOID order/judgment. Baer v. USA, 503, F.2d 393 Jurisdiction must appear as proved on the face of the record. Barnham v. Superior Court of California, County of Marin, 110 S. Ct. 2105 (1990) Judgment of a court lacking jurisdiction is void. 1. All acts of the legislature contrary to this or any article of this constitution shall be void. (SEE: Michigan Constitution, 1963, Article 1, § 21) Jerry James Stanton COLDWATER DAILY REPORTER FRONT PAGE. Officials records cleared in suit with tax protestor emailprint Comment 0 0 Jerry James Stanton (Facebook photo) Zoom Jerry James Stanton (Facebook photo) By Don Reid dwreid@aol Posted Jan. 15, 2015 @ 11:08 am Coldwater, Mich. JACKSON — Jackson County Circuit Judge Thomas D. Wilson on Tuesday took seconds to declare four documents filed with the Branch County register of deeds “to be of no legal force or effect” after Branch County filed for a declaratory action. Hillsdale County resident Jerry James Stanton has been in an ongoing dispute over property taxes in both Hillsdale and Branch counties. The anti-government advocate had filed an “Affidavit of Default – Acceptance of Debt Owed,” which could act as property liens against Branch County Treasurer Ann Vrablic, County Probate Register Marcia Curtis, county emergency manager Timothy Miner, Circuit Judge Bill O’Grady and Branch County Commissioners Rod Olney, Dale Swift, Don Vrablic, Jon Houtz and Randall Hazelbaker. This issue started in May when Stanton sent a document entitled “Affidavit of Criminal Complaint” to all of the parties as well as to several state officials, including the governor. It claimed to indict each of them for various alleged crimes and offenses. Stanton demanded a written response from each of the targeted individuals within 21 days. When none responded, in July Stanton then sent a “Affidavit of Default” to all to hold each of them individually liable for their proportionate share of the $12,197.85 Stanton paid in back Branch County taxes, interest and penalties to redeem his property from the tax foreclosure process. All the parties had been in some way involved in the tax foreclosure. County attorney Timothy Perrone of Colh, Stoker, and Toskey noted in his lawsuit by failure to respond to his original demand Stanton “presumed that (the officials) consented to (Stanton) placing liens upon them in their own personal capacity and on their property with the Branch County Register of Deeds and the Secretary of State.” Stanton had filed copies of all the documents with the register of deeds. While all the documents seem nonsensical and do not refer to any actual criminal case or lawsuit in any court, Perrone pointed out they “may be used by third parties to negatively impact the individual plaintiffs’ ability to sell property and/or obtain credit.” That was the reason for the suit against Stanton heard in Jackson by Judge Wilson because Judge O’Grady was a party. Stanton filed suit in federal court in 2010 on the taxation issue. Judge Paul L. Maloney threw out a lawsuit against Branch and Hillsdale county officials. Stanton, a well-known tax protestor who lives on Allen Road in Hillsdale County, wanted an injunction to prevent the tax sale foreclosures on his properties. Stanton had also asked for monetary damages because he claimed officials violated his federal civil rights and the federal racketeering (RICO) laws for what he said were illegal actions in enforcing the property tax laws. Read more: thedailyreporter/article/20150115/News/150119446#ixzz3OweePb27
Posted on: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 06:05:00 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015