Thank goodness we have come so far far past this. We can see now that Traylor was everything. He was very very serious. And his anger was cleansing.: Ultimately, any understanding of Traylor’s work combines all of the above, but primarily should be done so with the same regard that the great Jean Dubuffet wished from the public in understanding his own work . . . exclusively that of celebration, and whoever has thought to detect in it intentions of humor or satire, of bitterness or invective, has misunderstood it.[i] [i] From New Images of Man, Peter Selz, The Museum of Modern Art, p. 60, 1959.
Posted on: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 14:27:58 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015