The Amsterdam Court of Appeal ruled that the inspector had failed to abide by the Supreme Court ruling: given that he was not allowed to apply the #skimming #method, he should have based his substantiation of a higher “#customary #salary” on other data than the company’s revenue, but had failed to do so. koppeltaxconsultants.nl/newsflash/corporate-tax/customary-salary-of-director-cum-controlling-shareholder-where-private-limited-liability-company-employs-multiple-staff/
Posted on: Thu, 08 May 2014 10:05:11 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015