The Big Bang Theory is the leading explanation about how the universe began. At its simplest, it talks about the universe as we know it starting with a small singularity, then inflating over the next 13.8 billion years to the cosmos that we know today.n the first second after the universe began, the surrounding temperature was about 10 billion degrees Fahrenheit (5.5 billion Celsius), according to NASA. This is from space. If you look it up elsewhere, you will find similar explanation, very simplified, and non-committal. The first statement is usually how it it highly accepted, and leading theory, and then they vaguely tell you what it is and go on and on about the history of it, who invented the name, etc. The theory is mostly based on math, red shift, waves found in space, and lots of assumption. If you can find a text book to get specific you will find that nothing packed tightly together and then exploded outward into hydrogen and helium into frictionless space. If space was full of anything else, it wouldnt be the beginning. interesting to note, the guy who made it popular was George Gamow, who was a science fiction writer in 1948. He campaigned using cartoons, which he said really helped sell the theory. So you get these huge numbers, 13.8 billion years, 10 billion degrees... and nothingness explodes out. so over the next several days we will look at the assumptions thatmust take place for this to end up as a universe. Today is step one: The actual big bang explosion: 1. You are asking people to believe that a tiny bit of nothing blew up and created all matter. This is based on theoretical extremes and calculations. Nothing more. and it sounds like a fairy tale. 2. Nothingness cannot pack together. It has no way to push itself in close. 3. A vacuum has no density. It is said that it got dense before it exploded, but a total vacuum is the opposite of total density. 4. There is no ignition. No fire if no match. Couldnt be chemical, because there were no chemicals. they say also no atoms, not even sub atomic particles. No nuclear explosion if no atoms. 5. No way to expand nothing. 6. Nothingness cannot produce heat. Intense heat supposedly caused nothingness to turn to protons, neutrons, and electrons... but a vacuum in the extreme cold of outer space cannot get hot by itself. It would be magic if an empty void changed itself to matter. And no heat without an energy source. 7. Technically speaking, the calculations are too exacting. In laymans terms, it means the math is too perfect. The narrow mathematical limits of its expansion are such that its too narrow to have happened. R H Dickey wrote gravitation and the universe. in it he states that if the expansion was .1 percent faster it would have gone too fast, and if .1 percent slower it would have re-collapsed. 8. Roger L St Peter in 1974 developed math stating that if a big bang happened, it would collapse forming a theoretical black hole, and could not have happened. In essence you would have one theoretical action swallowing another theoretical action. 9. the theory states that anti matter would have to be created in equal amounts. what is well known to physicists is that there is not enough anti matter in the universe, and that antimatter immediately destroys matter, therefor would have destroyed any matter created, again theoretically. so there is some issues with the ridiculous moment that nothing exploded out to start forming the universe with a few sub atomic particles. When examined closely, and with reason, it does not, and could never hold water. But as Gamow said, cartoons may help.
Posted on: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:02:52 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015