The King Of Terror Description This is no ordinary book it cannot be read then put to one side. It is meant to be studied. From the markers through to the Bibliography; And beyond. If taken as a study the reader will open a mine field of evidence that the prophecy warned to us by Nostradamus - “The King Of Terror” has not passed us by. But is an on going event - Terrifyingly ignored - by all in the 21st Century. The Prophecy In the year 1999, and seven months From the sky will come the great king of terror He will bring back to life the great king of the Mongols Before and after, war reigns happily. List Of Contents Preface Introduction Chapter 1: History of the Spiritual Realm Chapter 2: God’s Laws Given to Israel Chapter 3: The Assyrians Chapter 4: A Witness Chapter 5: The Catholic Church—Changing God’s Law’s Chapter 6: The King of Terror Chapter 7: What is NATO Chapter 8: The European Union Super State Chapter 9: The king of the Mongols Chapter 10: Mongolia in the “21st Century Chapter 11: Tracing The King Of The Mongols Chapter 12: Vladimir Putin King of the Mongols Chapter 13: European Union Super State - A Perfect Religious Political Combine Chapter 14: United States and Great Britain; Descendents of Ancient Israel Chapter 15: The Middle East Wars - Fall of Iran Chapter 16: Psalm 83 A Conspiracy Against Israel Chapter 17: The War Between the European Super State and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Nations or The War between the “King of Terror and the King of the Mongols.” Chapter 18: The Victory of the King of Kings Bibliography: Sample of Chapters Chapter 1 History Of The Spiritual Realm …It is here when reading the bible in genesis 1 verse 2, that people think this verse is the beginning of all things on the earth. When the world was created. It was not. It was at this point in genesis 1 verse 2[115] that this was the aftermath of the earth, having being destroyed during the war between the rebellious angels and Satan, against God! God—“renewed”—the face of the earth[116][117][118]… Chapter 2 God’s Laws Given To Israel …to show the reason’s for the rise of the “King Of Terror”, its purpose for being! All that has been read so far, then read further is giving the outlines of this “King of Terror’s” motive. Below are these laws of God, that “Lucifer”, Satan hates so much, they are hidden from mankind by the great religions of mankind, religions made by mankind, but religions inspired by Satan!… Chapter 3 The Assyrians …Certain nations have been given—“Great Blessing” from God: Only to shun, and as nations turn their backs on God! Therefore, God uses, will use again, that nation which is the nation historically the most war like nation on the planet. Let me say, the reader should be aware, that this nation will be used as a “Tool” of chastisement or correction upon a sinful world. Therefore as they say, the pendulum swings both ways! For as we have heard before, “let him that has not sinned, cast the first stone”! This shall stands today… …Before their migration, Periplus, who lived around 550 b.c., wrote, “The coast of the Black Sea . . . is called Assyria”. [55] The Sumerians, “In the Zagros hills and across the plain to the Tigris, there lived a . . . fair-haired . . . people akin to the Guti (Goths) who . . . remained in what was afterwards Assyria.” [56] This description certainly matches those who descended from the line of Shem. “When the ancient Greek writers wanted to distinguish the Assyrians from the Arameans or Syrians, the Greeks called the Assyrians ‘Leucosyri’—meaning ‘whites’ or ‘blonds,’ as distinct from the very brunette Syrians who still live in Mesopotamia”. [57] By the time of Christ, the Roman naturalist Pliny the Elder recorded that the Assyrians were now dwelling north of the Black Sea. By this time, they had moved north.[58]… …But they did not stop there, “The Assyrians—before 604 b.c.—left their land north of Babylon and migrated northwest—through the lands that are now Georgia, the Ukraine, Poland, and into the land that is called Germany today. Today the descendants of those Assyrians are known to us as the German people.” [59]… Chapter 4 A Witness …Josephus is a prime witness, link from ancient history onto older biblical history, to the conundrum of the king of terror. So I give you an over view of Josephus the man, his life and his works as my proof of reference… … Josephus was a 1st-century Romano-Jewish historian and hagiographer of priestly and royal ancestry who recorded Jewish history, with special emphasis on the 1st century AD and the First Jewish-Roman War, which resulted in the Destruction of Jerusalem and its temple in 70 A.D. His most important works were The Jewish War (c. 75) and Antiquities of the Jews (c. 94). The Jewish War recounts the Jewish revolt against Roman occupation (66-70). Antiquities of the Jews recounts the history of the world from a Jewish perspective for an ostensibly Roman audience. These works provide valuable insight into 1st century Judaism and the background of Early Christianity… Chapter 5 The Catholic Church—Changing God’s Law’s …Constantine “legalized” Christianity with the Edict of Milan in A.D. 313. Later, in A.D. 325, Constantine called the Council of Nicea in an attempt to unify Christianity. Constantine envisioned Christianity as a religion that could unite the Roman Empire, which at that time was beginning to fragment and divide. While this may have seemed to be a positive development for the Christian church, the results were anything but positive. Just as Constantine refused to fully embrace the Christian faith, but continued many of his pagan beliefs and practices, so the Christian church that Constantine promoted was a mixture of true Christianity and Roman paganism…. Chapter 6: The King of Terror …So far in this book you have read of the, history of the spiritual realm, God’s laws, The Assyrians, A witness and the Catholic churches changing of God’s laws. These parts, have all been to prove some of the spiritual aspects of the king of terror. They have gone to show our historical spiritual beginnings. Who also, is in opposition to us from the start of that spiritual war. God’s laws laid down as a guide for mankind to keep observances and abeyance to God. We have seen how through the Assyrians, Nimrod, Sermirias and the catholic church they have orchestrated down the ages the changing of “Truth” to confuse us here at the end of the age, being ruled by our self’s, mankind, is deceived by Satan. This, part of the book, goes out to debunk any myths that have come out of the period of [July 1999], in the modern present age. These are all put out there to deceive us. Manipulate our thinking onto anything, but, the true war that is going on around us, now… …this news event of July 17th 1999 we find three people’s names mentioned. 1. William Cohen, the United States defence secretary of the time. 2. Osama bin Laden, the Saudi millionaire terrorist. 3. Gen Wesley Clark, NATO supreme commander in Europe at that Time…. …We also have to remember that through the month of [July 1999] millions of people went up in aeroplanes and came back down to earth. All these people can be ruled out. As a King of terror can only be a person or entity of great force in our world. So the average “Joe” or “Julie” in the air can be ruled out, so. Could any of these three in hind sight be connected with the king of terror in [July 1999] Lets take a look at their back grounds, careers and see whether there was any way of identifying one of them as the king of terror… Chapter 7: What is NATO But with the second line—From the sky will come the king of terror—the prophecy goes on to tell us in the third line—To bring back to life the king of the Mongols. Once again out of the three the pointer is to Osama bin Laden. But in reality of the year 1999 and in the month of July Osama bin Laden was no where to be seen. The reality that is bought out from the brief news items of July 1999 is that the main event of the time was the war that came out of the break up of Yugoslavia. We have to ask. Where was the world then in that month? And where is it now. What out comes have developed from this war? In hind sight from our position now we may be able to identify the person or entity/s. As in some peculiar way a question is also being ask of us today to identify who or what this is. Who or What is the “King” of Terror. From That date [July 1999] wars have increased. They have never stopped since. But to understand what is causing them. Who is behind them? What is the ultimate objective of on going wars? What are the causes? A lot of questions. Where are the answers? As none of the above involved in the wars of Yugoslavia, were kings. We have to define what the word “King” administers to our search for the king of terror. When thinking of a King, we automatically think of a monarch. What Is A King A male sovereign or monarch; a man who holds by life tenure, and usually by hereditary right, the chief authority over a country and people. A King can be defined as—a person or “thing pre-eminent in its class”: a king of actors[11] [a] During the war over the break up of Yugoslavia There where no kings or monarchs in control. Telling the army’s of either side to engage in this conflict in one way or the other. The people involved in this at all times as players where politicians. Or Military personnel in one guise or the other. On one side or the other. So taking the identity of any individual out of the equation. Would mean we are looking for an entity. Something that binds one side together. Something in a class of its own. We can get a king defined as—a person or “thing pre-eminent in its class”. Maybe this brings us closer to our objective as to the identity of the “king” of terror. As war was being waged at the time. Then it becomes quite obvious that the class of this king is war. As I mentioned earlier we of this era have been asked by an seer of renown to look out for and identify a king of terror in our time. This king of terror had the ability, at that time [July 1999] of coming from the sky. Obviously onto its prey. The prey being the Serbian armed forces who where on the receiving end of this kings assault. This entity that had the lead or advantage when it came to laying down or dishing out terror. So the class was the class of warfare. The supreme class of warfare. Was held by NATO forces. Who with greater aerial technology and know how were able to bomb the Serbs into submission from the sky. Chapter 8: The European Union Super State …these major war faring nations we have taken to investigate. What comes out of their development is how in the beginning they all developed. From small tribal clans, in Europe. To taking Independence through war. As in the case of the United States Of America. But always through history all these six nations changed as history and its economic, political and military prowess developed and changed in one way or the other for what ever reason. At some point through the waves of time and history each has risen on the wave of leadership and drowned under the sea of others rising to prominence to take their place… …But one nation has always been in prominence from the very beginning of history. Continually Rising and falling such is the heart and strength of this nation. Economics drives politics which drives war. Everything is changing. If slowly, it still is an ongoing breath taking rise and fall, battle for control in one way or the other. Now through the aftermath of world war two we find in Europe the rising “European Super State”. Not yet risen to prominence. But as its erstwhile descendents of ages past that rubbed shoulders with or against each other. Now a new and most remarkable new political economic military entity is being born out of Europe. Even though still in separate parts physically. European elites stride to bind Europe together as one large Super State… …The European Iron and Steel Community (EISC) is seen by many as the start of the process that led to the European Union. The European Iron and Steel Community was proposed by Robert Schuman and Jean Monet and came into being in 1951. By 1950, many parts of war torn Western Europe had many a good recovery from the devastating impact of World War Two. The primary reason for this recovery was the money provided to Western Europe by the Marshall Plan. Marshall believed that a financially and economically secure Western Europe would not fall to communism and that the region would become a major trading partner with America. Marshall’s optimism for Western Europe was not fully shared by many in France. There was a general feeling in France that the region would still once again be dominated by West Germany if the right opportunities occurred. Therefore, there was a chance of West Germany threatening France once more in the future. Schuman and Monet set about to find a way of tying France and West Germany closer together so that the very thought of one threatening the other receded into the past. They proposed that the iron and steel industries of Western Europe should be linked under a “Common High Authority in an organisation open to all other countries.” There had been some economic co-operation between Germany and France before World War Two and there was a desire to restore this after the war. France had a very good economic reason for putting her weight behind the project as West Germany’s coal and steel production was rapidly expanding. What was to become the EISC gave France a lever into this growth. The political climate of the time did not allow West Germany to dominate any new organisation and the only country that could fill this role was France… …The Treaty of Paris set up the European Iron and Steel Community with France, West Germany, Italy and the Benelux nations all joining. The treaty had three main points: There would be one market for coal and steel products of the six 1) member nations with an end to custom duties between them. The EISC would be under the control of the ‘High Authority’. 2) Jean Monet was the first president of the Authority. The treaty also established a Council of Ministers, a Parliamentary 3) Assembly and a Court of Justice. The logic of the EISC was to ensure that the member states within it had a regular supply of iron and steel and that the cost of each product was affordable. However, profit was not seen as a dirty word as money was needed to keep the EISC constantly modernised. The leaders of the EISC also believed that the organisation had to expand if it was to develop. What was to be a major economic development in Europe also led to a major rival to the UK’s iron and steel industry. Such rivalry almost certainly added to the anti-Europe sentiment that existed in the UK at the time—one that was to be identified and picked up by Charles de Gaulle. Military History Of The European Union[39] The military of the European Union comprises the several national armed forces of the Union’s 27 member states, as the policy area of defence has remained primarily the domain of nation states. European integration has however been deepened in this field in recent years, with the framing of a Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) branch for the Union’s Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) as well as the creation of separate international forces revolving around the EU’s defence. A number of CSDP military operations have been deployed in recent years. The principle military alliance in Europe remains NATO, which includes 21 of the 27 EU member states as well as other non-EU European countries, the United States and Canada. Several prominent leaders, including former French President Nicolas Sarkozy, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini and former Belgian Prime Minister Guy Verhofstadt, have voiced support for a common defence for the Union. This possibility, requiring unanimous support among the member states, was formally laid down in Article 42 of the Treaty on European Union upon the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon on 1 December 2009. Additionally, the Treaty of Lisbon extended the enhanced co-operation provision to become available for application in the area of defence. This mechanism enables a minimum number of member states to deepen integration within the EUs institutional framework, without the necessity of participation for reluctant member states. History [39] Following the end of World War II and the defeat of the Axis Powers, the Dunkirk Treaty was signed by France and the United Kingdom on 4 March 1947 as a Treaty of Alliance and Mutual Assistance against a possible German attack in the aftermath of World War II. The Dunkirk Treaty entered into force on 8 September 1947. The 1948 Treaty of Brussels established the military Western Union Defence Organization with an allied European command structure under Field Marshal Montgomery. Western European powers, except for Ireland, Sweden, Finland and Austria, signed the North Atlantic Treaty alongside the United States and Canada which only created a passive defence association until 1951 when, during the Korean War, the existing and fully functioning Western Union Defence Organization was augmented to form the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, NATO. In the early 1950s, France, Germany, Italy and the Benelux countries made an attempt to integrate the militaries of mainland Western Europe, through the treaty establishing the European Defence Community (EDC). This scheme did however not enter into force, as it failed to obtain approval for ratification in the French National Assembly, where Gaullists feared for national sovereignty and Communists opposed a European military consolidation that could rival the Soviet Union. The failure to establish the EDC resulted in the 1954 amendment of the Treaty of Brussels at the London and Paris Conferences which in replacement of EDC established the political Western European Union(WEU) out of the earlier established military Western Union Defence Organization and included West Germany and Italy in both WEU and NATO as the conference ended the occupation of West Germany and the defence aims had shifted from Germany to the Soviet Union. Out of the 27 EU member states, 21 are also members of NATO. Another 3 NATO members are EU Applicants and 1 is solely a member of the European Economic Area. In 1996, the Western European Union (WEU) was tasked by NATO to implement a European Security and Defence Identity within NATO, which later was passed over to the EU Common Security and Defence Policy as all Western European Union functions were transferred to the European Union through the Lisbon Treaty. The memberships of the EU and NATO are distinct, and some EU member states are traditionally neutral on defence issues. Several of the new EU member states were formerly members of the Warsaw Pact. The EU currently has a limited mandate over defence issues, with a role to explore the issue of European defence agreed to in the Amsterdam Treaty, as well as oversight of the Helsinki Headline Goal Force Catalogue (the ‘European Rapid Reaction Force’) processes. However, some EU states may and do make multilateral agreements about defence issues outside of the EU structures. On 20 February 2009 the European Parliament voted in favour of the creation of Synchronised Armed Forces Europe (SAFE) as a first step towards a true European military force. SAFE will be directed by an EU directorate, with its own training standards and operational doctrine. There are also plans to create an EU “Council of Defence Ministers” and “a European statute for soldiers within the framework of Safe governing training standards, operational doctrine and freedom of operational action”. Implications of the Treaty of Lisbon [39] The entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon triggered member states of the Western European Union (WEU) to scrap the organisation, which had largely become dormant, but they have kept the mutual defence clause of the Treaty of Brussels as a basis for a possible EU mutual defence arrangement. The Treaty of Lisbon also states that: The common security and defence policy shall include the progressive framing of a common defence policy. This will lead to a common defence, when the European Council, acting unanimously, so decides. (TEU, Article 42)… …the budding “European Super State” is extremely rich financially. If not all of its parts—meaning not all the country’s in it are economically sound. At the present time Europe is in financial and economic turmoil. But One Country is not. Their origins we have already divulged—this is modern day Germany. The power base of “The King of Terror”… …United Kingdom along with its younger brother, the United States—will soon be the recipients of “nuclear war” from the descendents of Nimrod—Assyria—modern day Germany, This will be proven. Turkey had its greatness during the time of the Ottoman Empire—but is aligned with the “King Of Terror.” So from the earlier section titles of Ancient Times and the middle Ages we are left with two nations. That of Italy and Germany. Both are intertwined and connected through an common religious entity. The Roman Catholic Church—“The Holy Roman Empire”! The Roman Catholic Religion goes through both nations… …We are still left with the name given to the Germans by the Romans. That Latin name was Germani or meaning “men of war”. It is this; link that will take us back further into antiquity for the ancient origins and history of the German people. As I am using both secular and biblical history to gain understanding of who/what the king of terror is, I now turn my attention to biblical history, also combining it with secular history too. To embellish the point being made in this book…. Chapter 9: The king of the Mongols …In this section the line “to bring back to life the king of the Mongols” does in fact bring us straight up to date with the world’s wars that now blaze through the middles east, onto towards Asia and into Africa. But we must, once more, go in steps to identify this king today. Earlier mentioned in this book. We asked earlier what is a King—A male sovereign or monarch; a man who holds by life tenure, and usually by hereditary right, the chief authority over a country and people. [70] It also defines King as—a person or “thing pre-eminent in its class”: a king of actors. In the case of the Mongols, they of old, they had both the king—a monarch and war class—was the pre-eminent embodiment or product of this reign. Though today they have political leadership but no king. Neither is Mongolia today a nation that can project its military prowess. Not for Unilateral use—the Mongolian military is for defence only… …The Mongols were illiterate, religiously shamanistic and perhaps no more than 700,000 in number. Their language today is described as Altaic, a language unrelated to Chinese, derived from inhabitants in the Altay mountain range in western Mongolia—a language unrelated to Chinese. They were herdsmen on the grassy plains north of the Gobi Desert and south of Siberian forests. Before the year 1200, the Mongols were fragmented, moving about in small bands headed by a chief, or khan, and living in portable felt dwellings, called by the Mongols “ger.” The Mongols endured frequent deprivations and sparse areas for grazing their animals. They frequently fought over turf, and during hard times they occasionally raided, interested in goods rather than bloodshed. They did not collect heads or scalps as trophies and did not notch wood to record their kills… …Mongol Empire was the biggest land empire in history. Its territory extended from the Yellow Sea in eastern Asia to the borders of Eastern Europe. At various times it included China, Korea, Mongolia, Persia (now Iran), Turkestan, and Armenia. It also included parts of Burma, Vietnam, Thailand, and Russia… Chapter 10: Mongolia in the “21st Century …Mongolia is not an economic power house in today’s world on its own… … In 1991 Mongolia began a rapid transition from central planning to a market-oriented economy. The collapse of the USSR and Mongolia’s links into the Soviet trading system led to dislocation, a sharp depression and increasing poverty in the first half of the 1990s as attempts were made to establish the foundations for a market economy. Reforms included price and trade liberalisation, the reduction of lending to state owned enterprises, the creation of a commercial banking system and a large privatisation programme which saw the proportion of the economy in private hands rise from 4% to over 70% between 1990 and 2000... Chapter 11: Tracing The King Of The Mongols …It is quite clear that in the 21st Century Mongolia, on its own, is not up to challenging our king of terror that is rising in the European Super State today, either economically or militarily. So something else is going on here… … the Mongolian empire it stretched over vast swaths of central Asia into Western Europe and Russia, touched down into the Middle East around Iran and then further east into where modern China sits today… …In the prophecy by Nostradamus of the king/s of terror and Mongolia, the second line, “to bring back to life the king of the Mongols”, is but an metaphor? As all these nations that where touched, aka invaded, by the Mongols are today in fact in collusion or closeness with each other and extremely close when it comes to economics and militarily. This closeness did not exist in the 20th Century or from the end of the Mongolian empire even to the end of the 20th Century. What is causing these nations to suddenly unite and come together? Taking the fact that Genghis Khan could also lay claim to being the most prolific lover?, rapist, the world has ever seen… …The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation or SCO is an intergovernmental mutual-security organisation which was founded in 2001 in Shanghai by the leaders of China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. Except for Uzbekistan, the other countries had been members of the Shanghai Five, founded in 1996; after the inclusion of Uzbekistan in 2001, the members renamed the organisation… Chapter 12: Vladimir Putin King of the Mongols …Russian president Vladimir Putin was a mystery almost for everyone during the moment of his election. He seemed to be a man with no past, inspired with the symbol of the new epoch, but deprived of historic roots… …Putin’s Russia relationships with NATO and the U.S. have passed several stages. When Putin first became President, the relations were cautious. After the 9/11 attacks when Putin quickly supported U.S. in the War on Terror, the opportunity for partnership appeared. However, the U.S. responded by further expansion of NATO to Russia’s borders and by unilateral withdrawal from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. Since 2003, when Russia did not support the Iraq War and when Putin became ever more distant from the West in his internal and external policies, the relations continued to deteriorate… …On 16 October 2007 Putin visited Iran to participate in the Second Caspian Summit in Tehran, where he met with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Other participants were leaders of Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan. This is the first visit of a Soviet or Russian leader to Iran since Joseph Stalin’s participation in the Tehran Conference in 1943. At a press conference after the summit Putin said that “all our (Caspian) states have the right to develop their peaceful nuclear programmes without any restrictions”… …It is quite obvious that Vladimir Putin has had and is having a larger than life role in the combining of strategy in economics social and military aspects of the descendents of Genghis Khan the one time ruler of the Mongol Empire. It is apparent that the SCO formed to integrate these descendents in all forms of life is working extremely well. Where there was discourse there is now co-operation on a vast scale across vast areas of the earth’s surface. It seems nothing if anything at all can come in the way of it… Chapter 13: European Union Super State - A Perfect Religious Political Combine …With the present aging Pope. Many people also look at the predictions of a bishop named Malachy, who reportedly had various vision of the Popes from his time to the last, the next one? Looking back to the motto’s given to the last four popes, before the possible prophesised last Pope, may give us an idea of what this next last Pope is about?… …Peter The Roman—Is he is from Rome? Or maybe because he has an eye for the European Union Super State to become like the ancient Roman Empire. He will give his backing to the political/economic empowerment of this entity. Giving it guidance and morality to his cause. In doing this he will give supposed spiritual guidance to the people of Europe as it goes through the tribulation of the re-born Holy Roman Empire. Causing war with Russia, China and Asia who will sweep through and defeat the European Union. Onto Jerusalem and the battle of Armageddon and the return of Jesus who will defeat all these army’s and the False Prophet/Pope and the Antichrist… Chapter 14: United States and Great Britain; Descendents of Ancient Israel …the coming European Super State and the nations of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation are soon to clash, through the cause and effect of the satanic leadership that will emerge inside of Europe… …the United States, Britain and that country in the Middle East containing a large amount of Jews, Israel, will not be on the world scene when this event above happens. Why is this and how can it be proved. The title of this section should read “Israel In Prophecy”! Why is this, are the people of the United States and Britain from the tribes of Israel? It is quite accepted that the Jews are… …The tribe of Dan originally occupied a strip of coast country on the Mediterranean, west of Jerusalem. Remember, in the Hewbrew, vowels were not written. The sound of vowels had to be supplied in speaking. Thus, the word “Dan” in its English equivalent could be spelled, simply, “Dn,”. It might be pronounced as “Dan,” or “Den,” or “Din,” or “Don,” or “Dun”—and still be the same original Hewbrew name. The tribe of Dan were principally seamen, and it is recorded Dan abode in ships (Judges 5:17). When Assyria captured Israel, these Danites took off in their ships and sailed west through the Mediterranean and north to Ireland. Along the shores of the Mediterranean they left their trail in “Den.” “Don.” and “Din.” Irish annals and history show that the new settlers of Ireland, at just this time, where the “Tuatha de Danaans,” which means, translated, “Tribe Of Dan.” Sometimes the same name appears simple as “Tuathe De,” meaning the “people of God.” And in Ireland we find they left “way marks”: Danslaugh, Dan-sower, Dun-dalk, Dun-drum, Don-egal Bay, Don-egal City, Dun-gloe, Din-gle, Dunsmor (meaning “more Dans”). Moreover, the name Dunn in Irish language means the same as Dan in the Hebrew: Judge. The northern colony of Danites when taken into captivity, and then with the rest of the Ten Tribes, they travelled from Assyria by the overland route. After leaving Assyrian captivity, they inhabited for some time the land just west of the Black Sea. There we find the rivers Dnieper, Dniester and the Don. Then, in either ancient or later geography, we find these way marks: Dan-au, the Dan-inn, the Dan-aster, the Dan-dari, the Dan-ez, the Don, the Dan, and the U-don; the Eri-don, down to the Danes. Denmark means “Dan’s mark.” When they came to the British Isles they set up the “way-mark” names of Dun-dee, Dun-raven; in Scotland the “Dans,” “Dons” and “Duns” are as prolific as in Ireland. And so the “serpent’s trail” of Dan sets up way marks that lead directly to the British Isles!… …Considering what is found in ancient annals, legends, and history of Ireland, which is very extensive, though coloured with some legend. Keeping the facts of biblical history in mind, one can easily sift out the legend from the true history in studying the ancient Irish Annals. Prior to 700 B.C. a strong colony called “Tuatha de Danaan” (tribe of Dan) and arrived in ships, drove out the other tribes, and settled there. Later, in the days of David, a colony of the line of Zarah arrived in Ireland from the Near East… …Then, in 568 B.C., an elderly, white-haired patriarch, sometimes referred to as a “saint,” came to Ireland. With him was the Princess daughter of an eastern king and companion called “simon Brach,” spelled in different histories as Breck, Berech, Brach, or Berach. The princess had a Hebrew name Tephi—a pet name—her full name being Tea-Tephi. Modern literature of those who recognise our national identity has confused this Tea-Tephi, a daughter of Zedekiah, with an earlier Tea, a daughter of Ith, who lived in the days of David. This royal party included the son of the king of Ireland who had been in Jerusalem at the time of the siege. There he had become acquainted with Tea-Tephi. He married her shortly after 585B.C.—when the city fell. Their young son, now about twelve years of age, accompanied them to Ireland. Besides the royal family, Jeremiah brought with them some remarkable things, including a harp, an ark, and a wonderful stone called “lia-fail,” or “stone of destiny.” A peculiar coincidence? Is that Hebrew reads from right to left. While English reads from left to right. Read this name either way—and it still is “lia-fail.” Is it also a strange coincidence that many kings in history of Ireland, Scotland, and England have been coronated sitting over this stone—including the present queen, The stone rests today in Westminster Abbey in London, and the coronation chair is built over and around it. A sign beside it labels it “Jacob’s pillar-stone”(Gen. 28:18)… …As there are nine other lost tribes of Israel, the United States in effect became the thirteenth tribe, and younger brother of Great Britain. Time in this book is not given to dwell on who the other nine tribes, as only the United States and Great Britain of them all have played such a prominent part on the world stage, to stand out as it where, well known to the world, to those not descendent from the tribes of Israel who will watch these nation’s be over thrown and fall, defeated in a nuclear holocaust because of their own immorality and the causes in the on going and coming conflicts that now brew across the Middle East… Chapter 15: The Middle East Wars - Fall of Iran …At the time of the writing of this book…October 2012... the most recent war in a succession of wars has been under way for some nineteen months in the central Middle East and its periphery. It is quite clear that before the tragedy of 11th September 2001 no one could have foreseen or comprehended that there would have been on going wars throughout the region. But at the point we are now, for those who have paid attention, it was going to explode at some point, when, depended always on the super powers of the world. As Africa changed violently over a period of decades, so the middle is having it’s African equivalent. Or is it? In Africa they have true independence, it would appear, is it possible for the nations of Islam to have theirs. It would appear some will and some others will not. This will depend on which of the big super power sides they are on… …The greater belief is that the United States has already blinked. The Middle Eastern allied nations close to Iran are now coming to the fore, so too is the United States debt, social and unemployment problems will soon surface to remove the United States of anything but observer status in the Middle East theatre of this war. It is more than likely that the European Union, somewhere down the line a few close years from now, will have survived the chaos we now see there. In effect a see-saw event is happening between the United States and the European Union. America’s problem’s are about to come to roost, aka Greece style, while Europe is about to turn the tide. The European Super State both economically, hence society will change in attitude as this is sorted, and militarily become powerful. As we have seen earlier the European Union has the tools to do the job on Iran, but up to date, not the leadership. It is the belief that this will change through the imminent rise of the satanic forces taking place and control within the European Union. It will be a Blitz Kreig throughout the Middle East on Iran and all its allies and proxies by a German led Europe that the Iranians will not have seen coming or thought could never happen!… Chapter 16: Psalm 83 A Conspiracy Against Israel …There is in the bible a prophecy, from Psalm 83, about ancient Israel’s descendents today and an unique and unusual alliance of nations that has never been before on the earth, ever. This unique and unusual alliance darkly and secretively prepares, plans for the defeat of the modern nations of Israel. This was the reason for pointing out who the modern descendents of ancient Israel are today. This event will happen after the wars on Iran and its allies in the Middle East have been defeated. If after having read this book so far and this prophecy does not have the hairs on your neck standing up with fright, you must be a very cold fish, or indifferent to such prophecies… Chapter 17: The War Between the European Super State and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Nations or The War between the “King of Terror and the King of the Mongols.” …With Iran and the Iranian alliance of nations defeated, along with the United States, Great Britain and modern day Israel also defeated in ruin their people taken captive into slavery. These events are just on our horizon. Psalm 83, the alliance of the European Super State and its Middle Eastern partners is now at the time of writing this book forming through the war in Syria. When this alliance settles in, to view it’s military victories, all of the European Union, the greater Middle East and north Africa will be under control of the European Super State and it’s Sunni Muslim Allies. In effect creating two gigantic empire blocks joined together through European technology and Sunni Muslim Oil and gas in the ground. In effect the European Super State will have bludgeoned it’s way to control of most of the world’s oil and gas supplies. What at first will have been that of great celebrations by most of the world at seeing the dramatic demise of what they will have viewed as their tormentors for many hundreds of years, that of the United States, Great Britain and Israel the people of the world will jump and rejoice with joy at these events! The dead, in millions of these three nations will lay in the streets of its cities rotting as trophy’s to the victorious nations and the rest of the world! But soon the nations of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation will realise what has unfolded before their eyes, has weakened them for oil and gas. They will ready for war with the leaders of the European Super State and the Sunni Caliphate now residing in the Middle East. It is in all probability that the false prophet, the Pope, will have left the Vatican and set up base in Jerusalem along with the antichrist. On seeing the SCO nations prepare for war the two alliances now in control in Europe and the Middle East will do a nuclear pre-emptive strike on the nations of the SCO. More than likely with not enough to finish the job. The SCO nations will retaliate. The king of terror from the second line and the king of the Mongols from the third line of Nostradamus prophecy will be going head to head in an all out nuclear and conventional war!… Chapter 18: The Victory of the King of Kings …As we keep in mind the time sequence, let us move ahead to Revelation 11:14-15: “The second woe is past; and, behold, the third woe cometh quickly. And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever.”[90] At this stage, Christ will return… …be filled with joy, to a “party”, given to us at a place to be decided by God . . . imagine that! Law 6—Feast Of Tabernacles—“Thou shalt observe the feast of Tabernacles seven days, after thou hast gathered thy corn and thy wine: And thou shalt rejoice in thy feast, and thy son, and thy daughter . . . seven days shalt thou keep a solemn feast unto the [Eternal] thy God in the place which the [Eternal] shall choose: because the [Eternal] thy God shall choose: because the [Eternal] thy God shall bless thee in all thine increase, and in all the works of thine hands, therefore thou shalt surely rejoice . . . [A]nd they shall not appear before the [Eternal] empty: Every man shall give as he is able, according to the blessing of the Lord thy God which he hath given thee.”…
Posted on: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 19:47:27 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015