< The Planet X Cover-up in the Mainstream Media On December 30th, 1983> NASAs Chief Scientist of the Infra-Red Astronomical Satellite telescope (IRAS) announced that NASA had discovered Planet X. Just one week after the story of Planet X was released, the magazine US News and World Report ran a story retracting the announcement and NASA has been silent ever since. That didn’t stop Dr. Robert S. Harrington who was the chief astronomer of the US Naval Observatory until his mysterious death in 1993. By analyzing an extensive amount of publications relating to Planet X, in chronological order, not only does the cover up of Planet X become extraordinary, but one gains a unique perspective of the evolution of the Planet X discovery. The following is a comprehensive collection of excerpts from Planet X articles dating back to the 1950’s. Pay close attention to the tone of each article as the theories progress. ================================================= Early Speculation — 1950 to 1968 In 1950, Immanuel Velikovsky published his ground-breaking work, Worlds in Collision. The hateful scientific attacks upon him were crushing, yet, his book was found open on Einsteins desk after his death. This suppression was aimed not just at Velikovsky. It was aimed at the kind of knowledge that naturally flows out from what is certainly, one of the most challenging books in the history of science. If was in the midst of this scientific pogrom, that the Planet X story truly began. ================================================= Spokane Daily Chronicle - Dec 9, 1950 Planet Pluto Almost Defies Measurements The new object for some time was designated by such names as Planet X, the Flagstaff object, and the trans-Neptunian planet. Some suggested that is should be called Lowell of the late director of the observatory since he had calculated that another planet must lie beyond Neptune and had seemingly predicted its location fairly accurately. =================================================== The Washington Reporter - Jan 2, 1952 Astronomers’ Scan Skies Seeking Tenth Planet X He says scientists have observed that Neptune is being lifted above its normal path in the heavens and that the cause may well be a huge tenth or perhaps even an eleventh planet slowly circling in space millions of miles beyond the present known limits of the solar system. Perhaps in the near future, Dr. Levitt declares, astronomers will again be pointing their telescopes to predetermined points searching for the point of light called Planet X. ==================================================== The term Planet X is a scientific designation for an unobserved object as indicated by the way in which it perturbs or tugs at the orbit of a known object. In this case, the search for Planet X was launched due to noticeable disturbances in the orbits of Neptune and Uranus. =============================================== The Evening Independent - Oct 14, 1963 The Discovery of the Planet Pluto PlutoThe next day the news spread out over the world. Soon newspaper and magazine reporters arrived in Flagstaff and swarmed over the observatory located on Mars Hill. Letters and telegrams poured in, containing congratulations and suggesting names for the new planet. In early May, the name Pluto was selected by Lowell Observatory and officially proposed to the American Astronomical Society. The discovery of Pluto was officially announced on March 13th, 1930 and this article was telling the story of its discovery on the 33rd anniversary date. ============================================== The Victoria Advocate - Jun 14, 1998 Pioneer 10 Still Searching We have a 90 to 99 percent confidence that Uranus and Neptune are being disturbed , and one candidate for is a single Planet X. Its conceivable there could other gravitational effects on the two orbits. We havent ruled out other matter which could be in orbit around the sun. It could be small particulate matter. It could be more than one planet that are very small. The best hypothesis is a single planet X at one to four Earth masses. ============================================== CORRECTION NOTE 13-Oct-2013: The original date for this article was Jun 14, 1988. Weve left it where the author originally placed it in the article. The original news story was removed from the Google News site since this article was published, so we are providing a copy for subscriber download. ================================================= A Watershed Year for Planet X Resarch — 1972 It seems NASA was confident that something was out there and since it was yet to be discovered, there was no need to hide anything. ================================================= The Nevada Daily Mail - Apr 26, 1972 Planet X Delays Comets Arrival Intolerable errors in the predicted timetable of Halleys Comet have led a University of California scientific team to believe a 10th planet may be circling the sun beyond Pluto - outermost known planet in the solar system. Three computer scientists at the Universitys Lawrence Livermore Laboratory said Friday their prediction of the planets existence is based on mathematical calculations related to the orbit of the mysterious comet. It is important to note that while Planet X was still undiscovered, the scientific community was very open about their theories and research. At this point, NASA is already on record stating that they are sure Planet X exists and now a scientific team from the University of California concurs. ================================================ Bangor Daily News - Apr 28, 1972 10th Planet a Possibility To make his predictions, Joseph L. Brady, supervisor of numerical techniques at the University of California, used information from previous observations of Halleys Comet, which has been reported since before the birth of Christ. With the laboratorys enormous computer system he worked out the planets probable location. =================================================== Beaver County Times - Apr 28, 1972 Planet X Joins Solar System Existence of the mysterious 10th planet had been predicted before, but Brady is the first to predict its orbit, mass and position, Lawrence officials said. The previous two articles are discussing the same research methods and theories. However, scientists and astronomers wouldn’t publish their theories in the Journal of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific if they were not convinced in their work, would they? ===================================================== The Phoenix - Apr 28, 1972 10th Planet Suggested The calculations concerning Planet X evolved from the studies of Halleys Comet. The comets orbit contains mysterious deviations and its appearance to Earth has never been predicted with accuracy. ==================================================== Pittsburgh Post-Gazette - Apr 29, 1972 10th Planet a Possibility The proposed body - dubbed Planet X by scientists - would be 3 times as large as Saturn and twice as far as Neptune from the Sun. =================================================== Sunday Times-Sentinel - Apr 30, 1972 Planet X Will Be Found Soon Discovery of a Planet X, nearly 6 billion miles from the Earth on the border of the Milky Way, has been predicted by scientists at the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory. ================================================== The Sydney Morning Herald - May 2, 1972 Haleys Comet Gives Clue to Planet X Haleys CometBut Brady thinks he can supply a good diary or ephemeris of Planet Xs movements. And astronomers might spot it because the planet would move against the background of stars which are so much further away they appear not to move at all. By studying the mysterious deviations in the orbit of Haley’s Comet, scientists in the 1970’s are beginning to formulate hypothesis to the size, location, orbit and distance of Planet X. ================================================== The Montreal Gazette - May 6, 1972 Beyond the Edge A school boy in Britain says he knew it was there all the time. Perhaps so, but he didnt know just where it was, and among astronomers, as among old wives, seeing is believing. X may take a long time to find. It is now on the edge of the Milky Way, where even a small area encompasses thousands of stars, many brighter than our new planet. It took 15 years to find Pluto even after its location was known. We may have to be patient. The important thing to note from this article is that it is indicative of the scientific community’s increasing acceptance of Planet X. It is becoming more a question of when, and not if, Planet X will be discovered. ==================================================== Sarasota Herald-Tribune - Jul 16, 1972 Planet X The discovery of a tenth planet in our solar system by virtue, evidently, of a ripple in the glide path of Halleys Comet is unquestionably a triumph of mathematics best appreciated by mathematicians. The scientists of the University of Californias Lawrence Livermore Laboratory can take a bow. The mathematic existence of Planet X is celebrated by the University of California… =================================================== Tri City Herald - Nov 2, 1972 Astronomers Report Xs Out Planet X Calculations Not so. Retorted Giclas. (Henry L. Gicias, executive director of Lowell Observatory) If Brady had contacted us, we would have showed him photographic plates for his predicted position of the planet. These plates have been carefully examined and no planet has been found. This is the first article to oppose the Planet X momentum. It does not, however, seem to be disinformation oriented or seek to cover up Planet X ===================================== https://facebook/photo.php?fbid=10205639100441094&set=ms.c.eJxNy8ENADAIA7GNqhyFCvZfrDzztWQUqncHKRNNHkx6pUxQA3KZgItJ1Eo~_l95V9QF1oBUr.bps.a.1502435405126.2066037.1361455713&type=1&theater
Posted on: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 02:27:41 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015