The Weilharters repeats again and again, that Olivers father ”is convicted” in Austria. Well, yes. But do you think he got a fair trial? Here are som important facts about the so called “trial” in Graz against Thomas Sorensen: 1. Thomas main defense was that he had custody in Denmark when he picked up the boy. According to Austrian law, you cannot be convicted of child kidnapping, if you have custody. However, before the trial began the Austrian judge declared, that he would not allow any arguments about the custody issue. Therefore, Thomas main defense was forbidden to be used, during the trial. 2. Mrs. Weilharter had been wanted by Danish police for child abduction. The judge did not want to hear about it and it was never considered as part of Thomas explanation for picking up the boy. In fact – the crime they wanted to convict the father for – was the same crime that the mother been in prison for in Denmark. 3. The judge interrupted Thomas many times during this testimony. Thomas was not allowed to speak as he wished. At one point the judge was angry and asked Thomas: “How many times has Mrs. Weilharter seen Oliver”! Well, as you can see on this page – she refuses to see Oliver. Thomas to explain this. But the judge just interrupted him: “HOW MANY TIMES”! And the answer was simple: One time. When her lawyer videotaped Oliver for the ORF hoax. Thomas was never allowed to explain that Mrs. Weilharter has never used her legal right to seek visitation. 4. The only witness to “the crime” was Mrs. Weilharter. The other witness, a woman from Kindergarden, saw nothing. She just heard screaming. Thus, the only witness to testify against Thomas, was the one person in the entire world, who could benefit the most from his conviction. 5. There was never any evidence of violence. None. The so called “brutal and violent kidnapping” was never proven. No evidence suggest that anyone was harmed. 6. Thomas had to pay a "price", to go to the trial. The Austrians demanded 10.000 EURO to the grant him safety for the trial. Since then, the money seems to be gone. Thomas family and friends collected to pay the money, because he is broke after 3 years of legal fees and journeys to Austria. 7. Thomas had to pay for his own defense. Lawyers don’t come free, even if you are accused for a crime. The Austrian way of “justiz”. 8. Only one of the Witness that Thomas lawyer had asked to come, came. The other three did not show up. The witness was a government official from Denmark, who testified that Thomas had custody over Oliver, while picking him up. 9. The Weilharter campaign of lies and deception had run in Austria, undisputed, for one year. No reporter has ever checked out her story. No reporter has ever been to Denmark to see Oliver or ask Danish officials questions of interest. The public sentiment, as seen on these pages, was angry and furios, based on the lie of the Weilharters who had run one hoax after another in Austria. And still going strong. 10. Mrs. Weilharters lawyer, who also worked for her during the abduction of Oliver to Austria, Britta Schönhart was co-accuser in the trial. How fair. Our conclusion is that Olivers father never received a fair trial. And that he could not be convicted, because NOBODY disputes that he has and had custody in Denmark. To not recognize that was against the concept of a fair trial. It should at least have counted for more in the common knowledge about the case, for the judge.
Posted on: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:26:20 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015