The dialectics of Love *smiles*: it is, first and foremost an abstract that has historical significance. it is a thing in and of itself and yet carries within itsef inherent contradictions. at first it presents itself as a thing so complete. as you scratch the surface it becomes a thing incomplete of itself. this be for it be a mere abstract whose conception is informed by an organ whose function leaves uncertainty. its conception therefore can be sad since it becomes foolish and fools the abstract mind. only the heart feels that which the mind opposes, so that the whole does not exist. only on its own would it be complete if its completion did not require a completer to complete it. beyond that, mostly between itself, a heart, and a thinking organ, is a contrary. at once the thinker fools the emotion and the latter makes uncertain the former. this dialectic develops in a more practical setup as its victims and victors, casualties and triumphants interact in the open. neither does it come to an end nor will it ever. i do not know if revolutionaries really every engage in this dialect. "lol once more".
Posted on: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 13:01:54 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015