The figure 80%. What could 80% have to do with the neck and headaches? Let me explain. In 2009 Headache Australia (in conjunction with pharmaceutical company MSD) ran a survey with over 500 migraine sufferers trying to assess the impact of migraine on people’s lives. The press release for the study was titled “Migraine misery spiraling out of control”. See below. Given the title, it’s not hard to guess the results were not particularly good, and at the same time not all that surprising. Quite disturbingly this study found that 81% of migraineur’s were looking for a better, more effective treatment for their migraines. Even worse, 83% didn’t expect their condition to improve. This sounds like a lot I know. It must lead to the question, with all the billions of dollars that have been poured into (largely pharmaceutical) research………are they missing something? Professor of Anatomy at Newcastle University, and world-renowned spine anatomist, Nick Bogduk thinks it’s fairly obvious what the missing link is: "People in control of the headache field seemingly have not, cannot, or will not recognize that this model for cervicogenic [neck based] headache is not only the best evolved of all headaches but is testable in vivo, in patients with headache complaints. No other form of headache has that facility." Officially, headache coming from the neck (cervicogenic) is reported to represent between 0.1% and 4% of all headache cases. Approximately 80% of the people assessed in The Headache Clinic have testable and reproducible head pain coming from the upper cervical spine. Almost all of these would not fit the diagnostic criteria for cervicogenic headache, but are mostly tension type headache (TTH) or migraine. Many of them do not believe they have specific problems with their necks. So what you say. I could make that number up right? Sure, but we are not alone. Dr Rothbart, an Canadian anaesthesiologist and head of the Rothbart Pain Management clinic has published his findings widely: “Approximately 800 new headache patients per year are examined at our clinic. An estimated 80% of these patients are diagnosed with cervicogenic headache. Of these patients, almost none are referred with this diagnosis. Physicians are not taught to consider or explore neck structures when investigating headaches. This results in a rarely diagnosed but common condition”. Rothbart P. The cervicogenic headache: A pain in the neck. Can J Diagnos 1996; 13: 64–71. That number again. 80%. Using the same techniques as the The Headache Clinic, Drummond and Watson investigated tension type headache (TTH) and migraine sufferers, and found that ALL of the TTH sufferers had their usual head pain reproduced during assessment, and 95% of the migraine sufferers had their usual head pain reproduced with manual examination of the upper part of the neck. Watson, D.H. and Drummond P. D. (2012) Head Pain Referral During Examination of the Neck in Migraine and Tension-Type Headache. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, Vol 52, (8), pp 1226–1235. The anatomical links between the neck and the “headache/migraine centre” in the brainstem are obvious. The numbers are becoming overwhelming. Over 80% are looking for something better. Is it a coincidence that almost all of them will not have had their upper neck assessed using headache specific assessment techniques? 80% of headache sufferers have necks that are causing a problem, but as a source of the problem the neck is largely ignored? I don’t think it’s any coincidence at all , that he same number are unhappy with their current treatment options. Many will have tried treatment using general neck therapy from physiotherapists, chiropractors and osteopaths, without success. It is time to try headache specific techniques and see if you too are in the majority of suffers who are needlessly putting up with treatable problems in the upper part of the neck causing so much misery. Imagine LIFE with Headaches!
Posted on: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 22:22:34 +0000
Trending Topics
© 2015