The proposed interpretation for the site is that it constituted a prominent landmark in its natural landscape, serving to mark possession and to assert authority and rights over natural resources by a local rural or pastoral population, Wachtel wrote in the summary of a presentation given recently at the International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East. Do you see how well theses modern academics reflect their materialistic conditioning? Its as if they were analyzing apes. True, they are analyzing apes, but humans are metaphysical apes in our thinking sometimes. No mention that this wall could have symbolized something sacred or meaningful. Be aware of these kinds of mind games the modern intelligentsia play.
Posted on: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 12:33:56 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015