Thought of the Day from Saturday, November 16th, 2013 Each person that has something to articulate to the rest of the world has the ability to entertain us to a different type of idea, persuasion, or differentiated perspective. What we must realize is that the world, as it is seen and envisaged by humanity, is one that consists of ideas. Our societies, cultures, governments, and civilizations are all situated on the premise of ideas that share commonalities, but maintain pitches that almost always differentiate. So, we cannot help but to wonder, is there really such a thing as an ideological singularity? The depth of dialectical overlap (which is nothing more than a medium of interpretation) insists that there is considering that when a worldview is manufactured it is almost always all encompassing in scale. Each and every detail of the outside world is classified or interpreted beneath the confines of its respective ideological and rhetorical umbrella; that latter stands as something that always defines the former. So behind every rhetorically ideological umbrella there is a persuasion that reinforces the validity behind its actual causation to implementation. Whenever something is founded from a preliminary foundation it is necessary to sell its manifested view of the world by pumping the consciousness of the social mainstream with an ideologue pitch that saturates the mind. Similar to consumer materialism people must be given enough incentive to support that ideological worldview, whatever it may be, which is nothing more than a rhetorical dialectic. That provides us with the makings of a persuasion and it often transforms into a way of life that produces a social/cultural paradigm for an entire population. Finally, a differentiated perspective stands as a source of indifference that alienates a person from the inalienable clauses that situates that rhetorically ideological worldview in question. Each person maintains some sort of indifference with civilization at large, but it becomes easy to silence dissent considering that the masses are largely indifferent to the ways of civilization and the medium in which it is governed. Why? As long as people are receiving a piece of the pie, as miniscule as it is, they are willing to keep their mouths shut for undefined periods of time. The classic problem that we must overcome when attempting to recalibrate civilization must work toward creating a resolution that can redefine that final quality, as previously stated, that maintains civilization. If more people were convinced that all encompassing worldviews should be defined based on individuality then civilization could expose lethargy as a crime to human civility.
Posted on: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 00:40:28 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015