Three examples of Zach Richardson making blatantly false claims while trying to convince superintendent Lykins to push through the dual principal plan at WSS (emphasis mine): Lisa nominated -------- for Teacher of the Year. --------- is the teacher whose students received the LOWEST TEST SCORES IN THE COUNTRY. Now I could understand if maybe -------- was a PE teacher and Lisa did not understand PE, so she nominated the wrong person, but Lisa is a curriculum expert and ------’s KIDS FAILED CURRICULUM. This example is a clear indication that Lisa has lost control over the curriculum teachers at her school are teaching. Having the LOWEST TEST SCORES IN PROBABLY THE COUNTRY indicates that her curriculum expertise is not being used effectively in leading her school. Lisa has explained the LOWEST GRADES IN THE COUNTRY as it being a “learning dip” for implementing a new curriculum.
Posted on: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 20:35:15 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015