Try now the righteousness of Nevada for the money trail K A judge must determine whether to publish the file would have records on money transfers; vulture funds companies want to reach Baez and Lopez By Silvia Pisani | NATION 30 32 The employer Lazaro Baez is being investigated by the money trail K. Photo: THE NATION WASHINGTON For the first time, the three parties could see their faces in court. Advocates of Argentina, vulture funds and the companies associated with the money trail K They will appear today before a judge in Nevada to elucidate, among other things, whether made public or not the information in that record. They are about 60 pages of documentation whose exact content is unknown. According to the testimony of witness Patricia Amunategui, there are no data on money transfers between Panama, Nevada and the Seychelles, among other data. But until now, no one knows what amounts or if the names of those responsible for the transfers are identified. The judge Cam Ferenbach begin to elucidate today if that information is made public. According to evidence gathered by the NATION last night, most expect that the judge decides the release of the data. There is not much reason to keep them hidden, he said. Nobody would be surprised, however, that the discussion takes place behind closed doors. According could tell the NATION, some people last night were also interested in apply to a court. If that goes through, that juicy discussion-and parts- arguments will be out of registration. The data is not less: that would include all positions that eventually do get the government. So far, Argentina lawyers have not participated in this matter. Only the challenge launched by the President, when days ago said he would not extorting vultures and challenged the judge to show the existing information is known. To appear in the courtroom, todays hearing could determine whether any of the lawyers of the country ratified in court arguing Cristina Kirchner and favors the release of secrecy that now weighs. But none of this can tell if, as expected last night, the discussion takes place behind closed doors. FOCAL POINTS Scheduled for 13 Nevada (18 in Argentina), the audience is also referred to decide two points. They are referred to demands of vulture funds to access information about companies allegedly linked with employers Christopher Lee and Lazaro Baez , both near Cristina Kirchner. One of the most controversial is the one that seeks to sue study information Mossack Fonseca, based in Panama. It does under the assumption that advised on financial engineering for money laundering, corruption including funds drawn from our country. NML, Paul Singer background trying to seize assets of Argentina to take their debt, is keen to achieve these authorizations. But given how dense the hearing, it is not excluded that the decision on these two points is postponed. The judge ordered Ferenbach confidentiality is the first question elucidated. Waiting for that moment, the parties have crossed warnings. NMLs lawyers claim to have information that the employer Lazaro Baez managed multimillion-dollar businesses in Nevada. Thats what they call the tip of an iceberg in the so-called money trail K. A line with trying to target Cristina Kirchner and the government, with which they want to negotiate payment of final judgment in his favor for the payment of their bonds in default. On November 26, when he returned from his prolonged absence by a box sigmoiditis, the President referred first to the investigation and challenged the judge to show case information. I have a hunch that they were looking for a name that finally found and, instead, found others. Tell the judge that no financial carancho will extort said the head of state in this message two weeks ago. That is another interesting point of the hearing scheduled for today. Both vulture funds as the network of 123 companies that intend to investigate as part of the alleged money trail, as the key witness Amunategui have already asked the magistrate, on occasion, to maintain confidentiality. All for different reasons. The Amunategui witness, for reasons of personal security and privacy; companies, because they will not disclose information and vulture funds, because, as have declarado- want to give guarantees of confidentiality to cooperate with their investigation. The presentation differs from that line is what made the journalist Jorge Lanata, along with the Center for Investigative Reporting in America (CIJL, for its acronym in English). John Marc Randazza, the sponsoring attorney will likely be the first to expose. If, as might happen, the judge decides to release the documents, the other fundamental point remains to be seen is how that decision is adopted. It is usual publication is available in the Internet system of American justice. A process that, in that case, require a couple of days on procedural grounds. Last night, another question seemed to complicate things. A strong storm in the west coast threatened to complicate travel plans of more than one of the participating attorneys.
Posted on: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:48:29 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015