(U.C.C. 1- 241, 242, 306, 308/ U.C.C. 1-207 All Rights Reserve david-lee; buess (non-corporation); Office of GRANTOR/SETTLER FOR THE: [DAVID LEE BUESS],[DAVID L. BUESS], [DAVID BUESS] et al, [David Lee Buess],[David L Buess], [David Buess] et al, TRUST, BONDS, Commodities, C.U.S.I..P., Trust Accounts to include: CESTA QUE VIE TRUST, AKA, ONE PEOPLES PUBLIC TRUST and Birth Certificate Bond(s), et al. C/O 22014 Delaware Township Road 184 Arlington, OHIO [45814-9998] Phone: 419 694 5796 18 January 2015 TO: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, dba, Corporation, et al Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal; Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent thereof: FAX: OGDEN, UT 855 214 7522 Recd 1:08 P.M. 1/19/2015 FAX: MEMPHIS, TN 855 214 7519 Recd 12:32 P.M. and 12:26 P.M. 1/19/2015 FAX: KANSAS CITY, MO 801 620 2391 Recd 12:36 P.M. 1/19/2015 FAX: PHILIDELPHIA, PA 267 941 1017 Recd 12:44 P.M. 1/19/2015 CC: World Court Congress FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, BIRMINGHAM, AL SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Adam C. Strickler – Complaint 55-1312-0202- C SUBJECT: TRUE BILL AND INVOICE FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY 2015 Whereas you have failed to respond to my Affidavit In Admiralty, as did the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, WASHINGTON DC, 6/14/2006, IT IS NOW JUDGEMENT IN COMMERCE. This True Bill and Invoice are payable upon receipt. You are currently in de fault in the amount of the sum certain: $824,356,052.65 due December 31, 2014. Your current fraudulent communications are totally without due process of law and your failure to comply with Court rulings in Schultz v. IRS 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals NY, NY, (2005) Case 04- cv-0196 – you have neither Court Order nor Writ necessary. Furthermore the 16th Amendment to the Constitution was never lawfully ratified and there are 17,000 certified documents which prove it taken from State and Federal archives. I did lawfully notify the Congress of the United States and they ignore it. They are now coconspirators to this tax fraud scheme. Your intentional ignoring this matter is only going to cost you more and criminal complaints will be filed against you for TREASON against the 1776 Constitution for the United States of America SUPREMACY CLAUSE and Treaties written as well as the ratification of the Bill of Rights ratified December 15, 1791 thereof. Need I remind you all the penalties for treason during time of war? Furthermore both the INTERNAL REVENUE CODE and all United States Codes must comply and any misrepresentation of fact falls under 18 U.S.C. 1001, must comply, with the rulings of the Supreme Court of these united States, now 50 thereof and are as follows: Case Law Not found in the INTERNAL REVENUE CODE – intentional fraud UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DECISIONS: LOWER COURTS: NOT FOUND IN INTERNAL REVENUE CODE: TITLE 26: FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT: 18 USC 1341 Honest Service Fraud. Legal Maximum: It Is A Fraud To Conceal A Fraud. BLACKS LAW 8th Ed. Page 1719. This Document Is For Education Of The General Public As Private Attorney Generals Must When Filing A Case Must Benefit The General Population. Print And Keep It Handy. If You Are Not Fully Educated On The 1933 Bankruptcy Act: Administrative Procedures Act: Trading With The Enemy Act: Gold Standards Act: Bank Holiday And The Congressional Records Get Busy As These Will Prove Beyond Any Doubt Acts Of TREASON And Sedition Have Been Committed: Collusion:Civil RICO:Fraud:Intentional Fraud:RICO: Tax Fraud:Violation Of Oath And Bond:Fraudulent Convayances:Theft:Grand Theft:Slavery:Identity Theft: et al. File A 1040X And Get Your Money Back. When Cashing All Checks Endorse It As Such: Redeem In Lawful Money Pursuant To 48 Stat 337: Title 12 USC 411. The INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE is a DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY - UNITED NATIONS And Their Personnel Are Trained By The Personnel Department Of The UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION. The IRS Are A Collections Agency And Fall Under Title 5 Of The United States Code: They Have No Lawful Right To Use The IRS Code Against Anyone. In 1999 All Revenue Districts And Directors Were Abolished Including Washington, D.C.. Public Company Traded On D&B For Profit. I Demand The Law License Of All IRS Agents: Judges: Lawyers: Attorneys. All Practicing Law Without A License. A BAR Card Is Not A Law License. 1818 U. S. v Beavans U. S. 336 And (1945) Hooven & Allison v Evatt 65 S Ct. 870, 880, 321 U.S. 652 89 L Ed 12.52 Established Two Political Jurisdictions For The U. S. Congress: 1) U. S. Citizens Are Residence Of One Of The Holding Territories Belonging To The United States: Guam: Puerto Rico: Virgin Islands: Washington, D.C.: Et AI: 2) The union States (50). Congress Writes Legislation: Corporate Policy: For Both But Fail To Distinguish For Which Political Jurisdiction The Legislation: Corporate Policy The Legislation Is Being Written For: Fraud By Trickery: Honest Service Fraud Thus The union States (50) Are Accepting It Without Question As Most Legislators Do Not Even Know About U. S. v Beavans. So You Are A Man:Woman On The Land In The union State Of [FILL IN THE ALL CAPS NAME OF YOUR STATE:IE:CORPORATION]. TREASON: UNITED STATES CODE, Title 28, 3002 Definitions (15)(A)(B)(C): United States Of America, dba, a Federal Corporation, Without Amendment, TREASON, aka, United States: De Facto See 1933 Bankruptcy Act, Executive Orders 6102, et al, Legislative Acts, et al for that time and Farm Bills. Order 6102, 6107, et al, Of President Roosevelt: Suspends The Constitution: - The Gold Standards Act-Criminal Fraud To Steal The Treasury Of The United States: Violation Of Oath And Bond: Induced Panic By Threat Of A $10,000.00 Fine. Hoard - Look Up The Meaning. 28 U.S.C.§3002 Definitions: (1779) (15) United States Means- (A) A Federal Corporation (B) An Agency: Department, Commission, Board, Or Other Entity Of The United States: Or (C) An Instrumentality Of The United States. Key Case Rulings; continued: 1. Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.Co., 240 U. S, 1.11 (1916) 2. Maxwell v. Dow, 176 U.S. 581,20 S.Ct. 448 (1900) 3. Texas v. White, 7 Wall. 700; U.S. v. Cathcart, 25 F.Case No. 14,756 4. Stanton v. Baltic Minning Company 240 U.S. 103, 112 (1919) 5. Bowers v Kerbaugh-Empire 271 U.S. 170, 174,174 (1926); In re Charge to Grand Jury, 30 F. Case No. 18,273 (65 C.J. Section 2) -- not known to be overturned. 6. Peck v Lowe 247 U.S.165, 173 (1918) 7. Doyle v Mitchell Bros. 247 U. S. 179,183 (1918) 8. Eisner v Macomber 252 U. S. 179, 183 (1918) 9. Evans v Gore 253 U.S. 245(1920) 10. Flint v Stone Tracy Co. 220 U.S. 107, 144,151-152, 165,55 S L.ed. 107419 Sup CCL Rep 342, Ann Cas. 1912B 1312(1911) 11. Merchants Loan And Trust Co. v. Smietanka, 255 U.S. 509519 (1921) 12. Helvering v Edison Brothers Stone, 8th Cir. 133 F2d 575 (1943) 13. Southern Pacific v Lowe 247 U.S. 330, 335 (1918): Art 1, Sec. 8, Cl17 And Art.IV, Sec. 3 CL 2: Art. 1 Sec. 8 Cl. 17: Art. IV Sec. 3 Cl. 15 USC 1681h: 28 U.S.C. 1333 or 1337: False Claims Act, see 31 U.S.C. 3729(a)(7) 14. UNITED STATES v MERKSKY 361 U.S. 431, 438(1960) 15. CALIFORNIA BANKERS ASSN. v SCHULZ 419 U.S.21, 26 (1974) 16. FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE CORP v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380,384 (1947) 17. Utah Power & Light Co v. United States, 391 18. United States v. Stewart, 108 re Floyd Acceptance, 7: Wall 666; Article 1 Sec.2: Art. 1 Sec.9 19. Knowlton v Moore, 178 U.S. 41, 47(1900); 19 CFR 351, 102 20. Butchers Union Co. v Cresent City Co. 111 U.S. 746, 756 (1884) 21. TRUAX v CORRIGAN 257 U.S. 312,348 (1921) 22. Sims v Abrens 167 Ark. 557271 S.W. 720, 773 (1925) 23. Myer v STATE OF NEBRASKA 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923) 24. Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall 36 25. Butchers Union Co. v Crescent City Co. 4 Sup Ct. 652 26. Vick Wo v Hopkins 6 Sup Ct. 1064 27. Minnesota v Barer 10 Sup Ct 862 28. Allegeyer v Lousiana 17 Sup Ct. 427 29. Lochner v New York 25 Sup Ct. 539, 3 Ann Cas 1133 30. Twining v New Jersey 29 Sup Ct. 14 31. Chicago B&O R.R. v. McGuire 31 Sup Ct. 259 32. Truax v Raich 36 Sup Ct. 7, L.R.A.1916D, 545 Ann. Cas. 1917B 283. 33. Adams v Tanner 37 Sup Ct. 662 L.R.A.1917F, 1163, Ann. Cas. 1917D 973 34. New York Life Ins. Co v Dodge 38 Sup Ct. 337, Ann Cas. 1918E,593 35. Traux v Corrigan 42 Sup Ct. 124 36. Adkins v Childrens Hospital 43 Sup Ct. 394,67 L. Ed (April 9, 1923) 37. Wyeth v Cambridge Board Of Health 200 Mass 474,86 N. E. 925, 128 Am St. Rep. 43923 L. R. A. (N.S.) 147 38. MURDOCK v COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 319 U.S. 105, 113; 63 Sup Ct. 875; 87 L Ed 1298 (1943); 39. Tyler et al Administrators v. United States, 281 US 497, 502 (1930 40. Pollock v Farmers Loan And Trust Co. 157 U.S. 429, 442, 555, 556, 573, 582, 595 (1895) 41. STRATTONS INDEPENDENCE, LTD. V HOWBERT231 U.S. 399, 417 (1913) 42. Main v Grand Trunk R. Co. 35 L. ed 994,3 Inters. Com.Rep. 807, 12 Sup Ct. Rep. , As interpreted in Galveston, H&S A.R. Co. v. Texas, 52 S.L. ed. 1031, 1037,28 Sup Ct. Rep. 638 43. U. S. v WHITRIDGE 231 U. S. 231 U. s. 144, 147(1913) 44. Taft v BOWERS 278 U.S. 470,481 (1929) 45. COPPAGE v STATE OF KANSAS 236 U.S.l, 23-24(1915) 46. U. S. v. Constantine 296 U.S. 287(1935?) IRS Ruled Unconstitutional As Prohibition Had Been Repealed. In 1965 The United States Supreme Court Traced The IRS Back To The Civil War And Found No Legislative Act Of Congress Lawfully Establishing The IRS As A Government Agency: Contractor: Sub-Contractor. Paul Andrews Mitchell (Federal Witness) Web Site supremelaw.org then Click On 31 Questions. Today The General Accounting Office In Affidavit Refuse To Produce The Lawful OMB Number For The IRS. None Of Their Publications Carry A OMB Number: Meaning they Are Not A U. S. Government Agency: Department: Contractor: Sub-Congractor. Today In Affidavit Congress Refuses To Produce The Organic Act Of Congress making The IRS A Government Agency: Department: Contractor:Sub- Contractor: Contact: :david-lee: buess (non-corporation) Office of Corrections For The Great Turtle Island 4196945796 Or Write Us C/O 22014 Delaware Township Road 184 Arlington Ohio [45814-9998] 47. The IRS Cannot Tax From The Source (Fraud By Trickery) Only From The Source Of The Kind In Question: Commissioner v Glenshaw Glass Co. 348 U.S. 426 (1945) Deals With Corporate Profit Gained From Settlement In Anti-Trust Case Not Income. Recent Case Rulings Against U. S. AND IRS 1 No Law Requires Payment Of An Income Tax: Federal District Court Western Division Of Tennessee (Memphis) Case No. 03-CR-20111 U. S. v. Kluglin (6/22-23/2005) 2. U. S. v. Linda Wall U. S. District Court, Central District Of California, Western Div. (Los Angeles) Case No. 2:04 cv 05325DDP-MAN and 2:03 cv 08406DDP-MAN Dismissed Without Prejudice: IRS Found Guilty Of Stepping Outside Their Authority: Mail Fraud: Counterfeiting Documents: No Enforcement Section Of IRS Code; et al. 3. U. S. v Lawrence USDC Peoria IL 06 cr 10019 (2005) IRS violated Paper Work Reductions Act: 44 U.S.C.3500-3520: 3512 I.R.S. Failed To Inform Lawrence He Was NOT required To Fill Out The Forms. 4. U.S. v Lindsey Springer: 08-278,09 cr 043: Without Revenue Districts There Is No Delegation Of Authority: Revenue Officers or Revenue Agents Are Not The Secretary Of The Treasury Nor The Commissioner Of The INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. We Will Make Adjustments As Required To Help Benefit The General Population. I Have Already Advised Congress [CONGRESS] The IRS Code Is Void For Reason Of Fraud. This May Also Effect Probate Laws. Congress and the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE now both aware of the tax fraud yet fail to correct the problem: 18 USC 1001 now applies. You are hereby put on Judicial Notice you must comply with with these rulings of the High Court thereof and that the 16th Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America is null and void on face ab inito. Whereas the ratification was never lawful and the 17,000 certified documents from state and federal records confirm there is no Lawful 16th Amendment to the Constitution for the united States. This is not my first letter to your offices relating to these issues rather hundreds of non-responses from your offices. I had this conversation with one of your agents, it went like this: Questions: Addressed to the IRS on 9 13 2013 Phone 1800 829 7650 at 5:41 P.M. Mr. Work Buffalo New York Office. What is your OMB number? Answer “I do not know” What law requires Payment? Answer: Party hung up. End of call. Answer – there is none. Now! From Code Section 26 INTERNAL REVENUE CODE show me the law that requires payment. I suggest you ref. U.S. V. KLUGLIN; USDC Memphis TN Case 03-CR- 20111(2005) in open court the U.S. Attorney could not produce the law requiring payment from IRC 26 and the case was dismissed. Show me any TRUE BILL AND INVOICE you have produced – ever – against me. There is none. Why is the lawful definition of income for all tax legislation not found in the IRS TAX CODE? Stratons Indep. V Howbert 231 U.S. 339 (1913) “the gain derived from Capital, from labor or from both combined, provided it include the sale or conversion of a capital asset“; the result of corporate activity. “Wages are not income within the meaning of the income tax amendment to the Constitution, or any other provision of the Constitution”. Key Case Stanton v Baltic Mining Co. 240 U.S. 103. “income taxes” were ruled unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court in the year (1895) Pollock v. Farmers Loan and Trust 157 U.S. 429, 442, 555, 556, 573, 582, 595. The INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE ruled unconstitutional (1935) U.S. v. Constantine 296 U.S. 287. (note added: today their only jurisdiction would be in Washington, DC; New York City, NY, and the holding territories, et al, belonging to the united States whereas unconstitutional, law, statute, codification(s) can only be written in these Federal Zones.) What is supreme law of the land? BLACKS LAW DICTIONARY 8TH EDITION page 1482 1. The U.S. Constitution. [Cases: constitutional law Key: 1.1] 2. Acts of Congress made in accordance with the U.S. Constitution; 3. U.S. Treaties, See SUPREMACY CLAUSE. See Supremacy clause – get it? Indians not taxed. You owe me a great deal of money now; pay up. You have NO AUTHORITY – JURISDICTION inside a union State thereof. (1920) Eisner v. Mcomber, 252 U.S. 189, 206 “Congress cannot by any definition it may adopt conclude what income is, since it by Legislation cannot alter the Constitution from which it derives its power to legislate and within whos limitations alone that power exists. At footnote 23 in the case of Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979), the U.S. Supreme Court admitted that no organic Act for the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE could be found, after they searched for such an Act all the way back to the Civil War, which ended in the year 1865 A.D. Close review of 31 U.S.C. disclosed that the Internal Revenue Service, a Private Corporation, is not shown as a division, bureau, or any part of the U.S. Treasury Department. All this can be looked up any time on Firstgov. 31 U.S.C. Chapter 3 does not list the IRS as an agency or part of the Treasury Department. 31 U.S.C. Subtitle VI section 9101 does not show the IRS as a Government Owned Corporation under “ Government Corporations “. 31 U.S.C. Subtitle I Chapter 9 section 901 does not list the IRS as an authorized agency. No authorized agency can use the IRS Code against anyone thus you are now talking mail fraud and extortion. As a private Corporation the IRS must register in every state to do business - correct? You will find them in the State of Delaware Division of Corporations. Prove they are paying their Corporate Income Taxes thereof and are lawfully registered in every union State office of the SECRETARY OF STATE. 26 Internal Revenue Code 6331 (a) Authority of Secretary If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same within 10 days after notice and demand, it shall be lawful for the Secretary to collect such tax (and such further sum as shall be sufficient to cover the expenses of the levy) by levy upon all property and rights to property (except such property as is exempt under section 6334) belonging to such person or on which there is a lien provided in this chapter for the payment of such tax. Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, or elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia, by serving a notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d)) of such officer, employee, or elected official. If the Secretary makes a finding that the collection of such tax is in jeopardy, notice and demand for immediate payment of such tax may be made by the Secretary and, upon failure or refusal to pay such tax, collection thereof by levy shall be lawful without regard to the 10-day period provided in this section. DO NOT FORGET THE COURTS RULING: WAGE FOR LABOR IS AN EXCHANGE AND NO INCOME IS GENERATED. ARE YOU SO INCOMPETENT TO BELIEVE I AM AN OFFICER? EMPLOYEE? ELECTED OFFICIAL? AGENCY? INSTRUMENTALITY? DO YOU HAVE SHIT FOR BRAINS? If so I want my back wages for the past 50-years! Benefit packages! Unused vacations, insurances, retirement, et al! WHY DOES THE IRS COUNTERFEIT THIS SECTION OF THE CODE, WITHOUT AN OMB NUMBER, AND VIOLATES THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT 3500 – 3520 SPECIFICALLY 3512 PUBLIC PROTECTION, AND START WITH (b) first on your notice of levy and lien on wages salaries, and other income - CRAP!? YOU ARE GUILTY OF EMBEZZLEMENT, MAIL FRAUD, EXTORTION just to name a few. As a collection agency you have no right to use the IRS code, law, or statute against anyone. I totally hate dumb asses! When did I grant to you permission to make out financial statements? I do not care what you think – What does the non existing law state? I have asked you these questions since 1999 and not one lawful response! Congress, Courts and the DOJ stick their heads up their asses as well. A notice of lien is not a lien nor a judgment, nor a Writ, nor a court order – is it? See Shultz v. IRS stated above. Since 2000 you have ignored these issues. (a) Authority of Secretary: not the agent! Whereas you do not know how to read the Code YOU SHOULD NOT USE IT ! YOU ALL ARE IMPROPERLY TRAINED IN LAW – WAKE UP! You have failed to produce your law license – practicing law without a license. It is not my job to train you so get off you dead asses and read. Every ruling of the High Court herein applies thereof and you must comply to them immediately. You have herein been informed – what are you going to do about it thereof? This letter stands as your 3rd Notice of Default (THIRD NOTICE OF DE FAULT). Pay immediately thereof. Thereof: ___________________________________________________ Autograph NOTICE OF SERVICE: On this the 19th day of January in the year of our LORD 2015 the entities named above were served via UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE first class mail, Facsimile or E-mailed and Posted to Government web sites. Attachment(s) TRUE BILL AND INVOICE - 3-pages Special instructions: when paying forward please use the Correct Zip code of [45814-9998] thereof.(True Bill and Invoice DEFAULT AMOUNT: Sum Certain: $824,356,052.65 (December 31, 2014) * LAWFUL NOTICE EFFECTIVE AUGUST 2014: (see bottom page 3) ((Form SCU-1040 Tax Refund 2008,2009,2010,2011. *(REV.15 September YOC 2014) True Bill: STATEMENT DATE – Y.OC January 16, 2015 Make payment In Lawful Money Pursuant To 12 USC 411 (48 Stat. 337) * sui juris-david-lee; family of buess: P.A.G., A.R.R.-sui generis.:Non Corporation Creditor:Benefactor:Beneficiary) (Demandant) *(Private Attorney General) $335.00/hr Inherent Office Of Corrections C/O 22014 Delaware Township Road 184 *Arlington, OHIO [45814] (Zip Code Exempt DMM 602 @1.3e (2)) THIS ACCOUNT IS NOW IN DEFAULT $824,356,052.65 December 31, 2014 NOW DUE AND PAYABLE TO Demandant: Payable upon receipt : Contract Subject To Change Without Notice As You Are In Default (Special Contract Debt - Affidavit 6/14/2006) Silence As Consent Is Value Forward As Value Accepted: Bad Men Removed (*U.S. v. Twell 550 F2d. 297) Wrong Doer, Debtor Account # 0001 - INTERNAL REVENUE: INTERNAL REVENUE : Debtor INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE P.O. BOX 219690 FEDERAL PAYMENT LEVY PROGRAM ACS SUPPORT STOP 5050, ANNES 5 P.O. 219263 KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64121 KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64121 COURT OF COMMON PLEAS: CASE NO 2008 cv 454 County of Hancock, State of Ohio, Filed 6/12/08: Fiduciary Trustee: Judge ROUTSON - Bond Requested. U.S. Secretary Of State, Rice Notified 7/14/08: *All Decisions And Orders From This Court Are Null And Void Since Judge ROUTSON Failed To Convene The Court And Committed Fraud Against The Plaintiff: Fraud By Trickery: Fraudulent Use Of Zone Improvement Plan(ZIP Code): Identity Theft: Traded On Dun And Bradstreet: Conflict Of Interest. False Flag. AMOUNT:Past Due: $ 824,356,052.65 DEFUALT Sum Certain December 31 , 2014 Service Fee: $ 85.94 Postal Fees: Other Related Duty.*Fuel Surcharge Harassment Fees:Adj, $ 335.00 Includes: Labor: Travel: Office Supplies:et al Fine Next fine ($1,000,000.00) 15 June 2015 Illegal Garnishment $ 219.18 Due Process Violations (Hale v. Henkel 201 U.S. 43 At 89 (1906) Late Fees: $ 31,000.00 10,000.00/per day Sub Total $824,396,692.77 (Note: Interest not including fine imposed) Interest: $234,781,178.10 (Monthly .2848%) annual 3.4176 Total Due and Payable: $1,059,177,870.87 Total *Sum Certain Amount Due: Payable Upon Receipt (Demandant) Will No Longer Accept Certified Mail From I.R.S. Effective March 7, 2008, Per Letter To Treasury Inspector General. *Next Fine: In The Amount of $1,000,000.00 (One Million Dollars and No Cents): are payable in June and December yearly. For Criminal Actions: Not Lawful: Against Demand ant: Beneficiary * sui juris-david-lee; family of buess: P.A.G., A.R.R.-sui generis. This Billing In Compliance With: Due Process Violations: Unlawful Tax Collections: Intentional Fraud: Fraud In The Inducement: Civil Fraud: Criminal Fraud: Unanswered Affidavits: Violation Of 44 U.S.C. 3500 - 3520Paperwork Reduction Act: Counterfeiting Of Documents: RICO 1951-1961 Organized Crime: Fraudulent conveyances-Counterfeiting: Fraud In The Ratification Of The 16th Amendment: Ignoring Some 60 Rulings Of The United States Supreme Court 1895-1923 Not Found In IRS Code: Impersonation As A Government Agency: Postal Fraud: Fraud By Trickery Intentional Fraud: Fraudulent Use Of Zone Improvement Plan (Zip Code). History: (FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE v. MERRILL. 332 US380 (1947): 5U.S.C. 3332: 5 U.S.C. 2906: GONZALES v. FREEMAN 334R.2D 570 (DC Cir.1964) HOTCH v. UNITED STATES, 212 F.2D 280 283 (9th Cir. 1954): 26 U.S.C. 7621: EXECUTIVE ORDER 10289: DOYLE v. MITCHELL BROS. 247 U.S. 179, 183 (1918): Congress - 12-9-1945 International Organization Immunities Act - relinquished all public offices of the United States to the United Nations - without Amendment - TREASON. U. S. v. Linda Wall 204 cv 05352 DDP-MAN and 2:03 cv 08406-DDP-MAN USDC CA (2005): U. S v. Kluglin USDC Memphis, TN 03-CR-20111: U.S. v. Lawrence USDC Peoria IL 06-cr-10019 (2005). Invoice Attached. (PROVIDE YOUR LAW LICENCE. *NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY/Default:: having failed to lawfully respond to affidavits and previous Deficiency Notice: and failure to lawfully respond by any court action against me within the past 7-years; payment is due upon receipt.)) *U.S. v. Twell U.S. 550 2d. 297. (Page 1 of 3) INVOICE *Rev. 2/20/2013 U.S. v. Twell U.S. 550 F2d. 297 YOU HAVE BEEN SERVED A 2ND NOTICE OF DEFAULT. (TRUE BILL: INVOICE *Rev. 15 JANUARY 2013 44 USC: 3500-3520 Payable On Receipt: *IRS advised to Read Queen Victoria Repeal BNA Act. Date: NAME: Account# 0001/INVOICE No: 11020-36 *********************************************************** 16 January 2015 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY Address #1: Address #2: PO Box 219690 Federal Payments Levy Program ACS Support Stop 5050 Annex 5 P.O. Box 219236 Kansas City, MO [64121] et al Kansas City, MO [64121-9236] et al ********************************************************************** Date Of Origin: YOC 2006 June 14 - Unanswered Affidavit. Lawful Billing Established. ********************************************************************** Payable In Lawful Money Pursuant To 12 U.S.C.411: 48 Statute § 337 The Sum Certain Of: The sum certain: $1,059,177,870.87 Due upon receipt.in Default pay immediately Make Pay to: david-lee; family of buess (Non-Corporate entity) Man On The Land:Creditor:Beneficiary: Benefactor: Beneficiary C/O: Office Of Corrections 22014 Delaware Township Road 184 Arlington, OH [45814] (Zip Code Exempt DMM [email protected](2)) Phone 419 694 5796 Fax: 419 694 1018 - No caller I.D or Phone Number your FAX will be blocked. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Silence As Consent Is Value Forward As Value Accepted BAD MEN REMOVED: I ACCEPT YOUR SILENCE AS CONSENT: ESTABLISHED IN APRIL 2010: Un-Answered Affidavit(s) June 14, 2006: INVOICE AND BILLING STATEMENTS. *U.S. v. Twell U.S.550 F2d. 297 Billing Statement Attached. A man, david-lee: family of buess, Man On The Land Creditor: Benefactor: Beneficiary: CRIMINAL HISTORY RELATING TO THIS INVOICE: Committed By: THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE: DEPT. OF TREASURY. NO CHARGES EVER FILED AGAINST :*[DAVID BUESS] :david-lee;dba[BUESS,DAVID BUESS]:et al, Man On The Land Creditor: Benefactor: Beneficiary: DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS: NO COURT ORDER: NO HEARING: NO LAWFUL LEVY: NO LAWFUL WRIT. NO LAWFUL AUDIT. IDENTITY THEFT: MAIL FRAUD: FRAUD BY TRICKERY: EXTORTION: COLLUSION: CIVIL RICO: FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT: UNLAWFUL GARNISHMENT(S):INTENTIONAL FRAUD: *VIOLATION OF PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT:44 U.S.C 3500-3520@3512: TAX FRAUD: NO LAWFUL JURISDICTION WITHIN union States (50). FRAUDULENT USE OF ZONE IMPROVEMENT PLAN (ZIP CODE): COUNTERFEITING DOCUMENTS:CIVIL RICO: Fraudulent Conveyance:No Enforcement Section:No Lawful Definition Of Income:No Law Requires Payment:Failed To File Lawful Levy In The Hancock County, Ohio Recorders Office:No Court Order: Honest Service Fraud: Paper Terrorism, Homegrown Terrorism. *U.S. v. Twell U.S. 550 2d 297; The IRS can take no action, Notice of Levy and Lien, against a supposed tax payer until first taking them to court. The case: (1/25/2005) Schulz v. IRS 04-0196-cv 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Cir. Room 1702, U.S. Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York City, NY. Page 2 of 3 The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that a natural individual entitled to relief is entitled to free access to its judicial tribunals and public offices in every State in the Union (2 Black 620, see also Crandell v. Nevada, 6 Wall 35. Plaintiff should not be charged fees, or costs for the lawful and constitutional right to petition this court in this matter in which he is entitled to relief, as it appears that the filing fee rule was originally implemented for fictions and subjects of the State and should not be applied to the Plaintiff who is a natural individual and entitled to relief. Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43] *LAWFUL NOTICE AND DEMAND February 20, 2013 I david-lee; family of buess, being of sound mind do hereby declare and decree that In the event of my death I do hereby will this account to my wife, sharon, trustee, son mark and his family, et al. Furthermore that this money shall be placed in a Trust Account and that the beneficiaries are entitled 50% of the Interest yearly and that the rest of the interest remain to grow the Trust Account established. Furthermore that upon the death of my wife, my son mark, shall be the trustee of this trust account and may in his Will make any adjustments required for the safety of this Trust Account and the beneficiaries to which are lawfully assigned to this Trust. This trust must remain within the bloodline of family of buess and family tree of lawrence avery and lillie marie buess, deceased, whos siblings were: patricia, paul, deceased, larry, gerald and david who resided in the village(s) Wharton, county of Wyondot state of Ohio and later of Mt. Blanchard, Ohio residents of the county of Hancock state of Ohio. Signature on file __________________________ david-lee; family of buess NOTICE: DUE TO FAILURE OF THIS CORPORATION TO PAY FORWARD ON THIS ACCOUNT, YOUR INTEREST RATE WILL INCREASE, EFFECTIVE MAY 15, 2014 BY 1% (.01) TO .2848% or .027333/mo. ON ANY UNPAID AMOUNT SUM CERTAIN. *LAWFUL NOTICE: The P.A.G. Charges effective August 2014 will increase to $335.00 for labor involved in the process of these Billing and Invoice statements. This is considered a cost of living adjustment. Page 3 of 3)
Posted on: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:37:28 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015