Under CA Rules of the Court, I submitted a timely filed request - TopicsExpress



          

Under CA Rules of the Court, I submitted a timely filed request today to speak before the Judicial Council, this Friday in San Francisco. To my knowledge, there is no rule which prevents them from granting my request for public comment. Im planning on showing them how many people want them to answer the question TOXIC MOLD! I Want to Know if Extrinsic Fraud is Fleecing the U.S. Public. Request to Speak at Judicial Council Meeting On October 25, 2013 Mrs. Sharon Noonan Kramer 2031 Arborwood Place Escondido, CA 92029 760-746-8026 Snk1955@aol Faxed on October 21, 2013 to: 415-856-7664, Judicial Council (JC) and Administrative Offices of the Courts (AOC) Legal Services (A) A description of the agenda item to be addressed; Allegations and direct evidence of criminal and professional misconduct by Judicial Council (JC) members and Administration of Offices of the Court (AOC) employees while aiding and abetting federal contractors, Veritox, Inc., in SLAPP. Latest documentation on the matter was mailed via Federal Express on October 12, 2013 to the Chairwoman of the JC; Director of the AOC; Chief Counsel JC/AOC Legal Services, & Chairman AOC/JC Litigation Management. (B) A specific recitation of the proposed statement with an explanation of its relevance to the agenda item and the reasons it would be of benefit to the council in its deliberations; “I have provided irrefutable evidence that AOC employees falsified material court documents, including a judgment; and that JC members along with other court officers and the plaintiffs in SLAPP, continued to use them to harass me while knowing their acts were aiding and abetting scientific fraud in U.S. policy and U.S. courts adverse to the public’s best interest. Specifically the five documents I cited in my October 12, 2013 communication to JC/AOC are: 1. The December 2008 Void Judgment in Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer, Case No. GIN044539. (Attached as Exhibit) Void on its face, it states a date of cost award not possible to have occurred to conceal it was ante-dated, twice. California Chief Justice Cantil-Sayauke and Director of the Administrative Offices of the California Courts Judge Jahr, admitting that this one court document is fraudulent and void to be used for any purpose; will cause the fleecing of the public by Veritox, et.al, to immediately cease. 2. The December 31, 2008 Abstract of Judgment & January 20, 2009 Lien in Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer, Case No. GIN044539. (Attached as Exhibit) It states interest accruing costs awarded on its face to Mr. Kelman before costs were even submitted by plaintiffs’ counsel, Mr. Scheuer. It is founded on the Void Judgment before it was backdated the second time and is contradictory to the current face of the Void Judgment. 3. The December 20, 2010 Remittitur in Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer, Appellate Case No. D054496. It awards costs to undisclosed “Respondents” when only one “Respondent’ was a disclosed, Mr. Kelman. It conceals that retired US Asst Surgeon General, Bryan Hardin, is a party, and has been known to the appellate justices to be improperly undisclosed since June of 2006, when he also was not disclosed in the anti-SLAPP. 4. The April 5, 2012 Minute Order in Kelman v. Kramer Case No. 37-2010-00061530 CU-DF-NC. It was used to give me a false FBI record to conceal I was incarcerated and first given a false criminal record for refusing to commit criminal perjury, by order of a judge who knew his court had no subject matter jurisdiction. 5. The June 12, 2013 Notice sent by an AOC employee from a non-existent “The Court”, used to aid a judge to obfuscate from providing impossible evidence of his prior court having subject matter jurisdiction. I want to know what actions the JC and the Director of the AOC intend to take to rectify the damage to me personally and the U.S. public, from Judicial Council members’ and other court officers’ continued usage of court documents which were falsified by AOC employees. The relevance is to stave off federal litigation while promptly protecting public health and safety from extrinsic fraud upon the court in a matter that impacts U.S. public health policies and toxic torts, nationwide.” Documents I intend to bring are: 1. The 2008 Void Judgment: freepdfhosting/786b95b2bf.pdf 2. The 2008 Contradictory Abstract of Judgment, proving the judgment is void: freepdfhosting/65ee1006af.pdf 3. 2008 Register of Action proving the face of the judgment is void. freepdfhosting/64f7288471.pdf 4. 2010 Remittitur awarding costs to “Respondents” freepdfhosting/c10eb4813a.pdf 5. The 2009 Certificate of Interested Persons disclosing only one Respondent. freepdfhosting/c10eb4813a.pdf 6. The 2012 Minute Order which libels me to conceal I was falsely imprisoned by a judge whose court had no subject matter jurisdiction. freepdfhosting/8f4bda9454.pdf 7. The AOC employee June 12, 2013 mailing from a non-existent “The Court” freepdfhosting/62339ad6d0.pdf 8. The JC/AOC Legal Services obfuscating reply to direct evidence of AOC employee document falsifications -- misdirecting me to the Commission on Judicial Performance (CJP) to address AOC employee falsification of material court documents. freepdfhosting/910259429c.pdf Please let me know as soon as possible, what time I should be at 455 Golden Gate Avenue on the 25th to address this gravely serious matter. Thank you, Mrs. Sharon Noonan Kramer
Posted on: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 00:45:37 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015