Understand the implication of Dred Scott v. US March 6, - TopicsExpress



          

Understand the implication of Dred Scott v. US March 6, 1857 White Supremacy demand that Gods and Goddess bow down to Adam (Ruddy/White) and those who reject to bow to Adams rule are deemed as devils / trouble makers. We said to the angels (gods and goddess) bow down to Adam: and they bowed down: not Ibis (Satan): he refused and was haughty: He was of those how rejected the faith (Sarah 2:34). White Supremacy has touched the Quran and the Christian Bible and in it the ideals play both sides of the coin. However, there is information out there to support that these books have within them the aboriginal Asiatic blackmans legacies which have been repackaged and used to enslave them. We had Christianity, Islam long before there was a Christianity or Islam and a Buddha. I mean no offense to those who believe, but I only speak to those who know there is something not working in these books for black folks and for the humanity of the world. For example, Dred Scott v. US, tells us the way you read the Bible/Quran is incorrect with the way the authors (White Supremacy/ Vatican City ) meant it. note: Do you see how all US Pres. bow to the Pope? Mr. Taney, which was concurred in by the other members of the supreme bench except Justices Curtis and McLean. The first question to be decided was that of citizenship. In this part of his opinion the chief justice said: It is difficult, at this day, to realize the state of public opinion in relation to that unfortunate race which prevailed in the civilized and enlightened portions of the world at the time of the Declaration of Independence, and when the constitution was framed and adopted. But the public history of every European nation displays it in a manner too plain to be mistaken. They had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior race, and altogether unfit to associate with the white races, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect, and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit.
Posted on: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 18:01:50 +0000

Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015